MichaelR
Posts: 9
Joined: 1/15/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: CuriousLord I have no intimate experience with a proper "switch". But, thinking about it, I'm pretty young. Most of my sub/slave's were vanilla before meeting me. I'm pretty sure that they can be either a sub/slave or vanilla now. While I suppose most of us don't consider it off the bat, isn't that being a switch? There is quite a difference between vanilla independence and slavery's demand for obidience. In a way, I have some respect for switch's. True, I'm sure many are either confused about their identity or just enjoy a variety of roleplaying positions, but isn't it also entirely possible that someone simply has a more sophosticated identity? My initial reaction to your post was to wonder why you imply that independence and submission are mutually exclusive. (granting, of course, that perhaps you didn't and I only inferred that) . My next reaction was to follow that out and wonder if a viewpoint where those things ARE contradictory could be part of some peoples difficulty in "getting it" when talking about switches. I confess, myself, to not "getting it" on anything more than an intellectual level. No more than I "get" why people are gay, or use drugs, or enjoy rollercoasters, or have unfailing belief in some deity. Intellectually, perhaps, but not in any way that allows me to truly grasp the scope of these things as those that embrace them might. Some things, outside my own experience or desires, will never click with me enough to truly understand them on any deep or personal level. To the OP: Keep asking questions. Sometimes you get dogged for the manner in which you present it, sometimes for having the audacity to ask in the first place. But, at worst you get to observe how the respondents react to things; at best, you gain some info that might help you get a better grasp on something you weren't understanding.
|