laurell3
Posts: 6577
Joined: 5/5/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MidMichCowboy quote:
ORIGINAL: BoundForFun Is it wrong for a submissive to make judgments on whether to serve due to sexual and intellectual attraction to their Dominant, or the lack there of? I hope not. I wouldn't want a woman to submit to me unless there is a spark of both sexual and intellectual attraction. I'm not just looking for someone to beat or order around. I want a woman that will fulfill the many roles in my life that I need, friend, lover, submissive, partner, and hopefully wife. I don't want someone who is punishing themselves for some reason by being with me. I say this, realizing I'm not a Brad Pitt (or even close). Hey, I have to depend on wit and intelligence to impress a lady (god, that sounds pathetic doesn't it), but one does what one does. I need to have a sexual and intellectual attraction to the lady I want to get involved with. I believe that what's sauce for the goose (is sauce for the gander). Nah it doesn't sound pathetic at all and I think you'd be suprised how many put much less faith in looks as they mature, although I wouldn't by any means say you're unattractive and I would NOT fuck Brad Pitt (well maybe if he paid me a million dollars...haha) OP I think you're making this too complicated. In my opinion, it's no different than vanilla dating in the beginning. The rules of attraction still apply.
_____________________________
I cannot be defined by moments in my life, but must be considered for by the entirety of my existence. When you fail to consider that I am the best judge for what is right for me, all of your opinions become suspect to me.
|