Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Can Bush do this?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Can Bush do this? Page: <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Can Bush do this? - 1/2/2008 9:06:13 AM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle


quote:

ORIGINAL: ModeratorEleven

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

I thought you was dead

Yeah, me and Snake Plissken.

XI




I think that was a reference to FHKY's incorrect assertion earlier in this thread...

quote:


oh ... that's right ... I forgot ... Mod11 died, and you are now "Forum God", and get to set the terms of all discussions.




Word

(in reply to farglebargle)
Profile   Post #: 121
RE: Can Bush do this? - 1/2/2008 9:08:44 AM   
TankII7871


Posts: 174
Joined: 4/22/2005
Status: offline
FOUL!!!  I'm sorry but this has been called on account of a foul.  According to the post the question is Would you perform a homosexual act on a terrorist by giving said terrorist a blow job in order to gain life saving info.  Two points here take either one you want.

1 Once you place your lips on his member he is then doomed to hell so only the threat of the blow job would work not the actual act.  So would i threaten to blow the guy  yes would i actually do it well in this case doing so is a mot point.

2 One man giving another man a blow job as a homosexual act.  As set forth by the Clinton administration Oral sex is not sex therefor it is not a sexual act therefor its can not be homosexual or heterosexual. 

Just here to stir the pot for the laughs

Eric

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 122
RE: Can Bush do this? - 1/2/2008 9:39:53 AM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TankII7871

FOUL!!!  I'm sorry but this has been called on account of a foul.  According to the post the question is Would you perform a homosexual act on a terrorist by giving said terrorist a blow job in order to gain life saving info.  Two points here take either one you want.

1 Once you place your lips on his member he is then doomed to hell so only the threat of the blow job would work not the actual act.  So would i threaten to blow the guy  yes would i actually do it well in this case doing so is a mot point.

2 One man giving another man a blow job as a homosexual act.  As set forth by the Clinton administration Oral sex is not sex therefor it is not a sexual act therefor its can not be homosexual or heterosexual. 

Just here to stir the pot for the laughs

Eric


I`ll take both.

1st one.The happy-go-lucky torturers, could do the "dirty" on another guy,like his best friend,so he knows they`re serious.Then  tell him that he`s(she`s) next.It could start with simple petting,and progress slowly.They could get someone who can suck start a Harley,so there`s no danger of a botched interrogation.

2nd.Doesn`t matter how the term "sex",is legally defined,here in the states.It only matters what the crazy jihadist believes.And that`s that they`re going to hell for eternity,to burn and be pissed on by satan,if the go gay.Not a pretty sight.....

My question is phrased,just like the pro-torturer`s ticking time bomb scenario.

The question is ,"if it would work(remove the word torture,and replace it w/  BJ),would you do it,to save American lives?

Not whether it would work or not.


If they believe that torture works and is necessary,then they must also be brave enough,and willing enough,to do what was necessary to extract that vital,time-sensitive intel.And that includes going down town,on a suspect.

This question is for the pro-torture types.(but I don`t mind someone stirring the pot)

< Message edited by Owner59 -- 1/2/2008 9:44:11 AM >

(in reply to TankII7871)
Profile   Post #: 123
RE: Can Bush do this? - 1/2/2008 11:28:44 AM   
luckydog1


Posts: 2736
Joined: 1/16/2006
Status: offline
Well first off owner59, Yes, if that was the only way to save lives, I would blow the guy.  If you make up some silly scenario where I have to take it up the ass, I guess I would do that if needed.  Now you can snicker and say I am Gay or something.....

Man, my open question must have really hit a nerve on you.  Not only were you scared to actually answer it, you went off throwing up distractions. 

Now how about a serious answer to what I asked. 

If there were a natural disaster, and a couple of large Democratic states physically could not vote, would you want to delay the election or hold it right away garunteeing a Republican victory?

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 124
RE: Can Bush do this? - 1/2/2008 12:20:34 PM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

Maybe "I can`t recall" would work.Or Alberto`s funniest phrase,"I can`t recall,recalling".That would work even better.lol

Hey smart guy......If you can hash out and explain what ,"I can`t recall,recalling" means,you win all the stuffed toys,on the middle shelf.

You have ten minutes. Go.


John Carter



Noah Wyle

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 125
RE: Can Bush do this? - 1/2/2008 12:46:11 PM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

Maybe "I can`t recall" would work.Or Alberto`s funniest phrase,"I can`t recall,recalling".That would work even better.lol

Hey smart guy......If you can hash out and explain what ,"I can`t recall,recalling" means,you win all the stuffed toys,on the middle shelf.

You have ten minutes. Go.


John Carter



Noah Wyle




Had to Google it.  Not an ER fan.

I think either name would be a sufficient reply to most of his "political" posts.

Firm


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 126
RE: Can Bush do this? - 1/2/2008 1:00:42 PM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline
Neither am I, my brother in law suggested it, and I had to ask who it was.

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 127
RE: Can Bush do this? - 1/2/2008 1:07:47 PM   
oreogirl


Posts: 1039
Joined: 8/24/2005
Status: offline
Does anyone have a foil hat?

_____________________________

Submissive does not mean weak.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Ich diene Ihnen, weil ich Sie liebe. Ich liebe Sie, weil ich Ihnen diene. Es macht in meinem Herzen keinen Unterschied.

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 128
RE: Can Bush do this? - 1/2/2008 1:10:31 PM   
celticlord2112


Posts: 5732
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: HaveRopeWillBind

What is even scarier is that he effectively has control of the Supreme Court now and could simply have term limits declared unconstitutional and then steal another election as he did the last two.


No he can't.  Presidential term limits are via constitutional amendment.  They are constitutional by definition, and not subject to judicial review.


_____________________________



(in reply to HaveRopeWillBind)
Profile   Post #: 129
RE: Can Bush do this? - 1/2/2008 1:34:59 PM   
Petronius


Posts: 289
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Muttling

I made this a seperate post because it it worthy of being seperate.........Torture and the UCMJ........


The president of the United States is given the power and authority to withdraw us from the Geneva Conventions or limit or compliance with them at any time he desires.  This was very specifically and intentionally set up with respect to torture because there was a fear of "What if we have captured an enemy (then a communist now a terrorist) who we know for certain is involved in a plot to plant a nuke on U.S. soil?"    The president should (and does) have authority to authorize any means necessary to get details of the plot from that individual and it would most certainly involve torture.

In the case of Guantanimo, the PRESIDENT authorized certain interrogation techniques that are widely considered to be torture (I agree that they are).   Since the order came from the president and we are talking about a treaty agreement instead of U.S. laws, it was a lawful order and the soldiers should not be held responsible.   The president should be, but not the soldiers.

If the soldiers were using such techniques at the command of a military officer, they would have been guilty of following an unlawful order and guilty of all the crimes associated with following that order.   However, the ONLY man who has the authority to authorize torture gave the order and they were obligated to comply under the UCMJ.


The Nazis tried that argument at Nuremberg. The U.S. and other prosecutors challenged it and the U.S. and other judges rejected it.

The results for the Nazis who tried the argument was a rope around the neck, delivered by a U.S. (and not other) hangman.

Even the rightwingers can't get the UCMJ to force soldiers to follow unlawful orders, rightwing propagandist rants to the contrary.

On the other hand, torture as laid down by the Bush government certainly seems like "terrorism" to me, at least as its defined by federal law.

(in reply to Muttling)
Profile   Post #: 130
RE: Can Bush do this? - 1/2/2008 1:57:12 PM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: celticlord2112

quote:

ORIGINAL: HaveRopeWillBind

What is even scarier is that he effectively has control of the Supreme Court now and could simply have term limits declared unconstitutional and then steal another election as he did the last two.


No he can't.  Presidential term limits are via constitutional amendment.  They are constitutional by definition, and not subject to judicial review.



Torture is prohibited too, via the 5th and 14th Amendments.

That hasn't stopped Bush and Gonzales from ordering it and CALLING IT legal...



_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to celticlord2112)
Profile   Post #: 131
RE: Can Bush do this? - 1/2/2008 2:02:16 PM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline
The ONLY thing you should be writing are the answers to these outstanding questions you've spent so much time and energy running away from.

I'd *LIKE TO * move forward and answer your NEW questions in turn, but your evasion in answering my PENDING questions prevents that.

quote:


"Has the Surge been successful in achieving the goals set prior to its execution?"

and

"If you were wrong then, why should anyone give credibility to what you say now?"




< Message edited by farglebargle -- 1/2/2008 2:03:11 PM >


_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 132
RE: Can Bush do this? - 1/2/2008 2:07:41 PM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: oreogirl

Does anyone have a foil hat?


Foil hat??

We are using titanium beanies and underoos around here.

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to oreogirl)
Profile   Post #: 133
RE: Can Bush do this? - 1/2/2008 2:10:45 PM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline
Once AT&T started feeding all the traffic on their backbone the the NSA, the tin-foil-hat crowd was validated in their concerns.



_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 134
RE: Can Bush do this? - 1/2/2008 2:21:34 PM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
Noah Wylie

(in reply to farglebargle)
Profile   Post #: 135
RE: Can Bush do this? - 1/2/2008 2:22:39 PM   
NavyDDG54


Posts: 203
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline
For everyone here. The President has the authority to suspend the geneva convention therefore making it legal for him to order torture.
The people we have in Guantanamo are not nice people. They are little more than animals. The terrorists being held there are the ones directly responsible for (intentionially) killing innocent civilians. And many of them have information vital to saving American lives.

Hypothetical question...if we knew for a fact that one of those terrorsits had info on a nuke in the US would you oppose using torture to get that info and stop that nuke?

The liberals criticize Bush for not doing enough to stop 9-11, maybe if we had tortured the terrorists prior to 9-11 we would have been able to stop it.

As for Iraq, we are WINNING. You want to support us (I say us because I am in the military and have been to Iraq). Send us care packages (phonecards, letters, snacks, batteries, etc...). We are determined the finish this war with a victory. It's taken a long time yes (4 1/2 years in Iraq) but no longer than WWII. with significantly less US casualties.

For those of you who think that Bush started the war you are wrong. The terrorists have been at war with us for decades:

1979: Iran Hostage crisis
April 1983: 17 dead at the U.S. embassy in Beirut.
October 1983: 241 dead at the U.S. Marine barracks in Beirut.
December 1983: five dead at the U.S. embassy in Kuwait.
January 1984: the president of the American University of Beirut killed.
April 1984: 18 dead near a U.S. airbase in Spain.
September 1984: 16 dead at the U.S. embassy in Beirut (again).
December 1984: Two dead on a plane hijacked to Tehran.
June 1985: One dead on a plane hijacked to Beirut.
After a let-up, the attacks then restarted: Five and 19 dead in Saudi Arabia in 1995 and 1996, 224 dead at the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania in August 1998 and 17 dead on the USS Cole in Yemen in October 2000.
Simultaneously, the murderous assault of militant Islam also took place on U.S. soil:
July 1980: an Iranian dissident killed in the Washington, D.C. area.
August 1983: a leader of the Ahmadiyya sect of Islam killed in Canton, Mich.
August 1984: three Indians killed in a suburb of Tacoma, Wash.
September 1986: a doctor killed in Augusta, Ga.
January 1990: an Egyptian freethinker killed in Tucson, Ariz.
November 1990: a Jewish leader killed in New York.
February 1991: an Egyptian Islamist killed in New York.
January 1993: two CIA staff killed outside agency headquarters in Langley, Va.
February 1993: Six people killed at the World Trade Center.
March 1994: an Orthodox Jewish boy killed on the Brooklyn Bridge.
February 1997: a Danish tourist killed on the Empire State building.
October 1999: 217 passengers killed on an EgyptAir flight near New York City."

Others in 1999:
-Ahmed Ressam is arrested on the United StatesCanada border in Port Angeles, Washington; he confessed to planning to bomb the Los Angeles International Airport as part of the 2000 millennium attack plots

2000:
-The last of the 2000 millennium attack plots fails, as the boat meant to bomb USS The Sullivans sinks.
- USS Cole bombing kills 17 US sailors and wounds 40 off the port coast of Aden, Yemen, by al-Qaeda

2001:
-9-11

(in reply to Petronius)
Profile   Post #: 136
RE: Can Bush do this? - 1/2/2008 2:26:28 PM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline
"IS THAT YOUR FINAL ANSWER"?

If so, we can just permanently tag you "WITHOUT CREDIBILITY: UNRESOLVED PAST FAILURES OF ANALYSIS", and disregard whatever you say henceforth.

I *have* given you every opportunity to explain your obvious failure, but your immature evasiveness has become too tiresome. I can stop asking for replies, and just inform people of your proven lack of credibility.

Your record speaks for itself. And I wouldn't be proud of it if I were you.



< Message edited by farglebargle -- 1/2/2008 2:27:49 PM >


_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 137
RE: Can Bush do this? - 1/2/2008 2:27:47 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
OH FUCKING SNORE; ALREADY!!!!!!!

1979: Iran Hostage crisis

(maybe you can tell us what started that....Hint Hint Hint, the Iranians looking for some of our weapons to even up which war that we were supplying the other side of?)  History for $10 bucks.....you should get this easily........hell $1 dollar.

talk maybe about Shah an Shah and 1954 and so on, a little and how they started that sort of thing (LOLOLOLOL), you will be excused from anything before that in that area as an outcropping of a really fucked up world war........but may be called into account regarding Jordan and Libya and so on.......

Ron 

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to NavyDDG54)
Profile   Post #: 138
RE: Can Bush do this? - 1/2/2008 2:30:48 PM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline
If you're man enough to torture a prisoner tied to a bed, why aren't you man enough to submit yourself to police custody for your crime, and plead guilty to the charge of Torture -- accepting the LEGAL CONSEQUENCES of your CHOICE TO TORTURE A PRISONER?

I think that's the real issue here -- Not "Under extraordinary circumstances, what should a person 'in the breech' do should the worst come to the worst"?, but "Why should someone who DOES break the law under those circumstances, evade the legal consequences of their choice?"

_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 139
RE: Can Bush do this? - 1/2/2008 2:31:35 PM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
Navy,

Excellent post and points.

However, the "John Carter", "Noah Wyle" and tinfoil hat crowd will simply dismiss any such information and start calling you names, make up asinine questions unrelated to anything you've said, and pose convoluted, unlikely scenarios in an attempt to cloud the issue.

And that's on a good day.

Firm


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to NavyDDG54)
Profile   Post #: 140
Page:   <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Can Bush do this? Page: <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.090