Vanatru -> RE: Gift? (1/4/2008 6:40:32 AM)
|
Of course there is disagreement when people apply fantasy to what they do. When they'd like to fantasize that being submissive is some sort of gift. The dictionary definition is at least pretty consistent. So, instead of being hypocritical and expecting others to nod their heads, instead of twisting words until they mean nothing, how about viewing the whole thing with a good dose of reality for a change? Also, most any "ordinary" person already has a pretty good idea of something being dominant or submissive (or most any term used in bdsm), this isn't a secret society where we need our own "special" language, handshake, or whatever. We aren't a different race, breed, or type of being. quote:
ORIGINAL: littlesarbonn I've learned over the years to avoid (like the plague) dictionary arguments. We're in an eclectic community that uses terminology differently than the status quo, so there are a number of different types of activities that using Webster's is not conducive to harmonious interpretations. What happens is you end up arguing over semantics instead of discussing possibilities of relationships. Quite a few concepts do not "translate" into the status quo, even though used in scene vernacular.
|
|
|
|