DesFIP
Posts: 25191
Joined: 11/25/2007 From: Apple County NY Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Sexynmentalinkc quote:
ORIGINAL: DesFIP Of course she now knows she can't trust you to communicate your needs in the beginning, to negotiate clearly, and not to interfere in her friendships. From the OP, it sounded like his concern was her safety. Whether or not that's truly a concern, and she'd have ended up safe no matter what, isn't really an issue. It was his lack of trust via her ignorance of when his word needed to be heeded...and when she felt it better to choose her own path (despite his possible warnings or admonitions). While we can ever be *sure*, unless we know both sides of the story, my feeling is that he'd already had this issue out some with her - and she'd made her choice. So he made his. *shrug* *tips his hat* - Mr. S I agree, that he had already made his decision. But I also stand by my comment that since she's a sub who doesn't live with him, who has huge amounts of autonomy, that he can't suddenly announce he's taking control in this area unless it was discussed and she consented to it. And that's what happened here, they hadn't discussed him having veto rights on her other partners. He just decided to do so and she refused consent. Hell if he had suddenly decided she had to turn over her paycheck without her agreeing to it, that also would have been out of the bounds of their negotiated relationship and she would have been equally right to refuse. It isn't what she did, it's the fact that it wasn't part of their relationship and he attempted to take control of it without her consent that was so wrong.
_____________________________
Slave to laundry Cynical and proud of it!
|