RoughFN
Posts: 197
Joined: 7/26/2006 Status: offline
|
I opted to start a new thread since I came up with another concept I'd like to explore and I'm afraid it'll get lost in the other discussion that I won't mention by name lest I accidentally triplicate that specific topic. Accidentally duplicating it was bad enough. This one is aimed at the slaves who have given up a great deal of control to your master, but wouldn't necessarily do anything he asked of you. Specifically, what if he ordered you to do something that conceptually you had a problem with, but the specifics didn't phase you. An example will help. Your master comes home one day and announces that from now on he will choose what you eat for dinner. This concept is completely abhorrent to you - it was never negotiated, you feel strongly about choosing your own food, it's an expression of your individuality, you want to eat healthily, yadda yadda yadda. You're completely opposed to this and are about to get really angry at him, when before you can say anything he continues, "And tonight you will have a cheeseburger." This actually sounds okay to you. You like cheeseburgers and could go for one tonight. Do you go along with the order just because the specific case is acceptable, or do you "follow" the order secretly knowing that you're not really complying, you just wanted a cheeseburger? Personally? If the concept is so appalling and unspeakable to my girl, I'd rather she balk and fight back immediately. Otherwise, we're potentially going to go a couple of weeks with me picking dinners that turn out to be acceptable to her by dumb luck and her just going along with it because it's easier than fighting. But eventually I'm going to hit something that she really doesn't want to do. Say I like lamb and she doesn't (which in my case is actually true) and I decree that one night she'll eat lamb. Then she blows up and screams and protests that me choosing her meals is completely inappropriate and not something she's going to do. That would clearly demonstrate that she wasn't actually obeying the order for the last few weeks and was just going along with it. The way I view it is that an order is something that you are supposed to do, and whether you want to do it or not is immaterial. So yes, you can follow an order if you like what you're doing and there's nothing wrong with that, but claiming that you're following the order when you're just avoiding an argument isn't submitting at all and that comes to light when something comes up you don't actually enjoy. But how would the rest of you react? Would you let a pleasurable specific order distract you from your not accepting the general case? Or would you stand your ground regardless of the specifics?
|