Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Bush: US should have bombed Auschwitz


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Bush: US should have bombed Auschwitz Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Bush: US should have bombed Auschwitz - 1/11/2008 12:31:23 PM   
NorthernGent


Posts: 8730
Joined: 7/10/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Leatherist

He was correct, there are still very few jews in europe to this very day.



What constitutes "very few" in your mind? England and France have sizable Jewish populations.

_____________________________

I have the courage to be a coward - but not beyond my limits.

Sooner or later, the man who wins is the man who thinks he can.

(in reply to Leatherist)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Bush: US should have bombed Auschwitz - 1/11/2008 12:33:32 PM   
Leatherist


Posts: 5149
Joined: 12/11/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: NorthernGent

quote:

ORIGINAL: trappedinamuseum

There's a book called, "What We Knew" by Professor Eric Johnson.



'Doesn't matter. There's nothing the Americans could have done about it, assuming the will existed.


Even if they just bombed the rail lines or reduced the crematoria to rubble-Hitler was so bent on eliminating them all that he was still diverting important resources to transport and kill jews-up to the bitter end. Even at the cost of his own civilians and military. If they hadn't of died there-it would have been the old way-with a bullet in the head in a field someplace.

_____________________________

My shop is currently segueing into production mode.

I'm not taking custom orders.

(in reply to NorthernGent)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Bush: US should have bombed Auschwitz - 1/11/2008 12:34:57 PM   
trappedinamuseum


Posts: 5066
Joined: 8/24/2006
Status: offline
This could just be semantics, but genocide refers to the extermination of a single population, culture, group etc.  The Holocaust targeted more than just those of the Jewish population; millions of the Romany, Polish, and other kinds of people were murdered as well.

Is that considered genocide, or mass murder?

Also, Hitler wasn't as efficient as you think.  True, there are few people of Jewish descent in Europe, but, many were deported or left after the Nuremburg laws were put into place and before the "extermination" policy.  They weren't exterminated; they just left.

_____________________________

"You're gonna catch a cold, from the ice inside you soul.
Don't come back for me.
Don't come back at all" - Jar of Hearts

(in reply to Leatherist)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Bush: US should have bombed Auschwitz - 1/11/2008 12:35:09 PM   
Leatherist


Posts: 5149
Joined: 12/11/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: NorthernGent

quote:

ORIGINAL: Leatherist

He was correct, there are still very few jews in europe to this very day.



What constitutes "very few" in your mind? England and France have sizable Jewish populations.

Middle europe, poland. Checkoslovakia. Parts of eastern russia. That was where the main brunt fell.

_____________________________

My shop is currently segueing into production mode.

I'm not taking custom orders.

(in reply to NorthernGent)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Bush: US should have bombed Auschwitz - 1/11/2008 12:36:28 PM   
Leatherist


Posts: 5149
Joined: 12/11/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: trappedinamuseum

This could just be semantics, but genocide refers to the extermination of a single population, culture, group etc.  The Holocaust targeted more than just those of the Jewish population; millions of the Romany, Polish, and other kinds of people were murdered as well.

Is that considered genocide, or mass murder?

Also, Hitler wasn't as efficient as you think.  True, there are few people of Jewish descent in Europe, but, many were deported or left after the Nuremburg laws were put into place and before the "extermination" policy.  They weren't exterminated; they just left.


And they were able to come back. I was pointing out the efficiency with which those who did not have the time or resources to flee were dealt with.

_____________________________

My shop is currently segueing into production mode.

I'm not taking custom orders.

(in reply to trappedinamuseum)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Bush: US should have bombed Auschwitz - 1/11/2008 12:36:42 PM   
NorthernGent


Posts: 8730
Joined: 7/10/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Leatherist

quote:

ORIGINAL: NorthernGent

quote:

ORIGINAL: trappedinamuseum

There's a book called, "What We Knew" by Professor Eric Johnson.



'Doesn't matter. There's nothing the Americans could have done about it, assuming the will existed.


Even if they just bombed the rail lines or reduced the crematoria to rubble-Hitler was so bent on eliminating them all that he was still diverting important resources to transport and kill jews-up to the bitter end. Even at the cost of his own civilians and military. If they hadn't of died there-it would have been the old way-with a bullet in the head in a field someplace.


It's well documented that it was known in Britain, and, as our secret services are closely linked, I'd be surprised if the US authorities weren't aware.

German resistance groups passed info and photos on to the British.

The invasion didn't happen until 1944 for a very good reason - logistically, it wasn't possible.

_____________________________

I have the courage to be a coward - but not beyond my limits.

Sooner or later, the man who wins is the man who thinks he can.

(in reply to Leatherist)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Bush: US should have bombed Auschwitz - 1/11/2008 12:39:13 PM   
NorthernGent


Posts: 8730
Joined: 7/10/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Leatherist

Middle europe, poland. Checkoslovakia. Parts of eastern russia.



Well, yeah, that's true enough, but the above doesn't constitute Europe.

Anyway, would you stay in a place where all you can get to eat is dumplings and cabbage soup?



_____________________________

I have the courage to be a coward - but not beyond my limits.

Sooner or later, the man who wins is the man who thinks he can.

(in reply to Leatherist)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Bush: US should have bombed Auschwitz - 1/11/2008 12:40:24 PM   
Leatherist


Posts: 5149
Joined: 12/11/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: NorthernGent

quote:

ORIGINAL: Leatherist

quote:

ORIGINAL: NorthernGent

quote:

ORIGINAL: trappedinamuseum

There's a book called, "What We Knew" by Professor Eric Johnson.



'Doesn't matter. There's nothing the Americans could have done about it, assuming the will existed.


Even if they just bombed the rail lines or reduced the crematoria to rubble-Hitler was so bent on eliminating them all that he was still diverting important resources to transport and kill jews-up to the bitter end. Even at the cost of his own civilians and military. If they hadn't of died there-it would have been the old way-with a bullet in the head in a field someplace.


It's well documented that it was known in Britain, and, as our secret services are closely linked, I'd be surprised if the US authorities weren't aware.

German resistance groups passed info and photos on to the British.

The invasion didn't happen until 1944 for a very good reason - logistically, it wasn't possible.


I realize that and agree. The military on the allied side had bigger fish to fry-the German Reich. Why bomb a concentration camp when you needed to take out ball bearing production? Especially with the huge losses being taken by bomber groups over those targets-makes no sense.

_____________________________

My shop is currently segueing into production mode.

I'm not taking custom orders.

(in reply to NorthernGent)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Bush: US should have bombed Auschwitz - 1/11/2008 12:42:06 PM   
Leatherist


Posts: 5149
Joined: 12/11/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: NorthernGent

quote:

ORIGINAL: Leatherist

Middle europe, poland. Checkoslovakia. Parts of eastern russia.



Well, yeah, that's true enough, but the above doesn't constitute Europe.

Anyway, would you stay in a place where all you can get to eat is dumplings and cabbage soup?




I've simply read the history. It's documented, not much to argue with when you can just look at census records.

_____________________________

My shop is currently segueing into production mode.

I'm not taking custom orders.

(in reply to NorthernGent)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Bush: US should have bombed Auschwitz - 1/11/2008 12:43:53 PM   
NorthernGent


Posts: 8730
Joined: 7/10/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: trappedinamuseum

True, there are few people of Jewish descent in Europe,



Not true. England and France have sizeable Jewish populations, and I believe the German Jewish population has increased dramatically in the last 15 years.

quote:

ORIGINAL: trappedinamuseum

but, many were deported or left after the Nuremburg laws were put into place and before the "extermination" policy.  They weren't exterminated; they just left.



They didn't simply "leave". They were not wanted by the Eastern Europeans. Many of the Jews who survived the holocaust and left for Israel, didn't want to go; they were Czech/Hungarian/Slovak etc first, Jewish second - they were forced to leave.

_____________________________

I have the courage to be a coward - but not beyond my limits.

Sooner or later, the man who wins is the man who thinks he can.

(in reply to trappedinamuseum)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Bush: US should have bombed Auschwitz - 1/11/2008 12:54:31 PM   
cyberdude611


Posts: 2596
Joined: 5/7/2006
Status: offline
The theory is that the allies did not feel it was strategically neccesary to divert military resources to take out 1 camp when winning the war would end the camp's operation anyway. The first real claim that the allies knew about Auschwitz was in late August 1944. The D-Day invasion had just been completed and the allies were making good progress on the western front. The Soviets were putting pressure on Warsaw in the east. So the allies believed that crushing Hitler was more important.

Now the government's official position at the time was that bombing that camp would be too risky and had a low chance of success. But in late 1944, Hitler basically lost all air supremacy. His air force had been severely depleated. And the allies were choking his oil supplies. It is unlikely the Nazis had any ability to stop an allied bombing campaign of Auschwitz. So I dont buy that excuse.

(in reply to Leatherist)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Bush: US should have bombed Auschwitz - 1/11/2008 1:10:22 PM   
Leatherist


Posts: 5149
Joined: 12/11/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: cyberdude611

The theory is that the allies did not feel it was strategically neccesary to divert military resources to take out 1 camp when winning the war would end the camp's operation anyway. The first real claim that the allies knew about Auschwitz was in late August 1944. The D-Day invasion had just been completed and the allies were making good progress on the western front. The Soviets were putting pressure on Warsaw in the east. So the allies believed that crushing Hitler was more important.

Now the government's official position at the time was that bombing that camp would be too risky and had a low chance of success. But in late 1944, Hitler basically lost all air supremacy. His air force had been severely depleated. And the allies were choking his oil supplies. It is unlikely the Nazis had any ability to stop an allied bombing campaign of Auschwitz. So I dont buy that excuse.


Yes. I think it just didn't really matter to them at the time. Of course, it's terribly important NOW-with the jewish state of Israel looking at us with a jaundiced eye.

_____________________________

My shop is currently segueing into production mode.

I'm not taking custom orders.

(in reply to cyberdude611)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Bush: US should have bombed Auschwitz - 1/11/2008 1:21:42 PM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: cyberdude611


Now the government's official position at the time was that bombing that camp would be too risky and had a low chance of success. But in late 1944, Hitler basically lost all air supremacy. His air force had been severely depleated. And the allies were choking his oil supplies. It is unlikely the Nazis had any ability to stop an allied bombing campaign of Auschwitz. So I dont buy that excuse.


OK so the allies bombed Auschwitz. What about Buchenwald, Daschau, Ravensbruck and the rest? http://www.mtsu.edu/~baustin/holocamp.html Bombing Auschwitz and not all the others would be meaningless and many of the camps weren't known to the allies even if (and they probably did) know what was going on. In the meantime, the main aim of winning the war would have been diverted and the Soviets were advancing west rather quickly. The main aim of the allies was to meet the Soviets as far to the eat as possible.

_____________________________

There are fascists who consider themselves humanitarians, like cannibals on a health kick, eating only vegetarians.

(in reply to cyberdude611)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Bush: US should have bombed Auschwitz - 1/11/2008 3:13:13 PM   
Moloch


Posts: 1090
Joined: 6/25/2005
Status: offline
Who cares if bush said that? The man is right!!!
I dont think any one here can TRULY imagine what it means to be STARVED while being worked to death.
I would much rather die in a bomb blast.

(in reply to meatcleaver)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Bush: US should have bombed Auschwitz - 1/11/2008 3:23:27 PM   
Level


Posts: 25145
Joined: 3/3/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Leatherist

Like, karma is a bitch. It always comes back around eventually-no matter how powerful you THINK you are. Arrogance often equals idiocy.


Truer words were never spoken.

_____________________________

Fake the heat and scratch the itch
Skinned up knees and salty lips
Let go it's harder holding on
One more trip and I'll be gone

~~ Stone Temple Pilots

(in reply to Leatherist)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Bush: US should have bombed Auschwitz - 1/12/2008 4:55:03 AM   
NorthernGent


Posts: 8730
Joined: 7/10/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Moloch

Who cares if bush said that? The man is right!!!
I dont think any one here can TRULY imagine what it means to be STARVED while being worked to death.
I would much rather die in a bomb blast.



I think you'd have to be in the situation to make an informed choice; I'd imagine the survival instinct would kick in and you'd cling on to any hope, which would make being worked senseless a more attractive option than having your head taken off your shoulders by a bomb.

_____________________________

I have the courage to be a coward - but not beyond my limits.

Sooner or later, the man who wins is the man who thinks he can.

(in reply to Moloch)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Bush: US should have bombed Auschwitz - 1/12/2008 5:01:42 AM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Moloch

Who cares if bush said that? The man is right!!!
I dont think any one here can TRULY imagine what it means to be STARVED while being worked to death.
I would much rather die in a bomb blast.



I'm with NG. Given the choice between being blown up or given the inaccuracy of bombing, maimed and left wounded and in agony, you would probably choose the hope of escape, no matter how improbable. Let's be honest, many victims went quietly to their death because of the capacity of human bengs to hope beyond hope that they will survive.

But then, maybe you are super human and not one of your average 'feet of clay' normal human beings.

Oh, and Bush was just talking his normal gibberish. I don't know why people believe politicians when they wear their emotions on their sleeve, especially when they are quite happy to order the bombing of innocent people themselves.

< Message edited by meatcleaver -- 1/12/2008 5:03:17 AM >


_____________________________

There are fascists who consider themselves humanitarians, like cannibals on a health kick, eating only vegetarians.

(in reply to Moloch)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Bush: US should have bombed Auschwitz - 1/12/2008 5:07:43 AM   
xBullx


Posts: 4206
Joined: 10/8/2005
Status: offline
-fast reply-

Most perceived experts on anything live within the realm of hindsight ........... Bull

It is said that often times the historians claims as to "what we knew" was the prognosticators speculations .......... Bull

Where are all the experts when the job has yet to be accomplished? ......... Bull


Just a few words to ponder on.



_____________________________

Live well,

Bull



I'm not an asshole; I'm simply resolute...

"A Republic, If You Can Keep It."

Caution: My humor is a bit skewed.

(in reply to NorthernGent)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Bush: US should have bombed Auschwitz - 1/12/2008 5:54:16 AM   
caitlyn


Posts: 3473
Joined: 12/22/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: xBullx
Most perceived experts on anything live within the realm of hindsight ........... Bull

It is said that often times the historians claims as to "what we knew" was the prognosticators speculations .......... Bull

Where are all the experts when the job has yet to be accomplished? ......... Bull


I agree completely.
 
Can anyone here, categorically state that Churchill, FDR, Stalin, Ike, etc ... took a documented stance (documented by them, as opposed to someone selling a book), on any of the intelligence we now know existed at the time?

_____________________________

I wish I could buy back ...
the woman you stole.

(in reply to xBullx)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Bush: US should have bombed Auschwitz - 1/12/2008 6:03:26 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline
It was a death factory, of course we should have bombed it - just like we bombed their every other factory.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moloch

Who cares if bush said that? The man is right!!!
I dont think any one here can TRULY imagine what it means to be STARVED while being worked to death.
I would much rather die in a bomb blast.



_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to Moloch)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Bush: US should have bombed Auschwitz Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.095