Missokyst
Posts: 6041
Joined: 9/9/2006 Status: offline
|
I can see that some people might engage in the concept of "consentual ignorance". I remember when I was married, I knew my mate was fooling around and though I KNEW it.. and I didn't care, he was under the assumption I was blissfully ignorant. He believed he was pulling one over on me. I was amused by his complacency. Sometimes people choose to be ignorant and that is fine. I chose not to mention I knew I had no feelings for my ex husband. I was commited and nothing more. But, I have seen situations where the man said his wife knew but perferred to remain ignorant, and then seen her face if she runs across it, and observed the hurt because clearly for her HE had consented to her remaining ignorant, while she had assumed he had given up on his desire to stray. In that case everyone got hurt. I perfer my consent to be in the open so that no misconceptions arise. Kyst quote:
ORIGINAL: ownedgirlie quote:
ORIGINAL: Missokyst Aye.. and believe me it is a much safer choice to step away if their mate declines a meeting. Because if there is no real agreement which can be verified in some way, then they would be walking into potential problems down the road. Kyst I understand your reasons for playing it safe to avoid problems. There are many levels in which we can take the safe road; this is just one of them. I respect your right to do so, but was offering a perspective from "the other side" which may help others understand why a mate may not want to meet. Again, from my perspective (and my Master's also, as I came to learn), if someone chose to leave as a result, that was their right and their issue. But there are reasons the mate may not want to be involved, and those should be respected, too.
_____________________________
pain is the breaking of the shell that encloses your understanding ~Gibran, Kahlil “The truth is, everyone is going to hurt you. You just got to find the ones worth suffering for.” ― Bob Marley
|