Termyn8or
Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005 Status: offline
|
I am dominant, but I like to bottom, so I guess that is a certain kind of switch. If I have someone restrained, I am responsible for their well being. And I do not take that lightly. But the thing is that the bound person has no responsibilities at all. So I guess I agree 146.93%. The other 53.07% is in what the restrainer does to the restrainee. Just wondering, are you talking abiout regular police cuffs, leather or leather and metal like those dandy ones from ER, or those gnarly Cluejso (sp) cuffs that would take a machine shop to cut off ? Or perhaps rigidcuffs ? Rigidcuffs are nuts, you can't reach the keyhole so even with the key you can't get out. In fact I got pretty good size wrists and if cuffed palms out I cannot get out of regular handcuffs even with the key. People with smaller wrists can sometimes. It takes a bit of dexterity, but it is not all that hard as long as you can turn the wrist in the cuff. In fact even velcro cuffs can do the job as long as the wearer can't get to them with their mouth or their other hand. So I will say this, at least for those with big wrists, cuffed palms out gets you deeper than palms in. I think this is bigger than cuffs, there are other things, for example a collar. I think a locking collar will get you deeper than a non locking collar. Is it the frustration of not being able to scratch that itching nose ? Or the fact that you can't get out ? I tried to explain the concept on LMU, with untold success. Got responses of which some agreed, others had other ideas about it. That was to be expected. Of course that subject was chastity belts, so it is a bit different, but I think the similarities are significant. Actually, one of the things that hit me like a ton of bricks was one of Susan L's designs, the M1 CB. What was so intriguing about that was that it locks with a combination lock IN THE BACK.(if you want I can give you the URL to that in my own private FTP space, it cannot be hosted by a commercial site in the US due to USC2257) So is it the dependence upon someone else to get out the main thing ? Or is it that itch you can't scratch ? That distinction is somewhat akin to is it the mind or the body ? I am starting to think it is both. Of course it is all in the mind, I guess it would be more aptly put to ask is it the physical or mental aspect of it ? I am thinking it is a combination of the two. T
|