MrKite
Posts: 94
Joined: 3/11/2005 Status: offline
|
I’ve had a few conversations with some slaves I know and found a difference of opinions that I found interesting. A whipping boy, in feudal times, was a boy of the same age but lower rank raised with a prince or nobleman as a playmate, who was whipped in his place when the young nobleman -- too high in standing to be beaten by anyone below his father, who was often unavailable -- misbehaved or slacked in his studies, as a psychological 'indirect punishment'. In modern times, the term has come to mean a scapegoat, or something that is a frequent recipient of undue pain, punishment or mistreatment, including inanimate objects. (From Wikipedia) Societal norms teach us that if some person(s) do us wrong that we should confront that person(s) to resolve the issue. If a slave is property for the use of the owner in anyway desired, can a slave be used as a whipping boy? Can a slave be used as a scapegoat for an owner to vent anger or frustration in any form be it verbal or physical? What if the slave offers his/her self up for such purpose? I’m just putting this up for discussion. Please direct your answers the forum community not me. I already have my answer.
_____________________________
If it feels good, do it.
|