AquaticSub -> RE: Master and pet banned from the bus (1/27/2008 5:05:06 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: brainiacsub quote:
1) If one of my vanilla friends wore a collar and leash because it appealed to them as an accessory and they were treated the same, would they also be idiots exposing the public to a kink? If not, why is it impossible for us to also wear these items as a fashion accessory? I have already answered this in response to GreedyTop. Again, I am not so certain this couple would have drawn the ire of the bus driver if the leash had been dangling from her neck as opposed to being led like an animal (in the publics view, not mine). My friends don't always have the leash simply dangling - sometimese others do lead them. For them it's just fun and a joke. The idea that us doing it is a rude and forcing our kink on others makes no sense to me if a vanilla girl is allowed to do the same thing - just as long as she doesn't have any other meaning attached to the leash and collar. quote:
quote:
2) For various reasons (none including anything so interesting as making a statement), I recently dyed my hair an unnatural color. That makes me different from the social norms, at least around here. I used to have a lot of piercings. If the sight of these things offends someone, should I be kept off a bus and called freak? I mean, if the logic here is that "different from the norm means you deserve what you get"... That is not the logic I argued. It's not about what you deserve, it's about anticipating consequences (again, see my response to Darcy). But, bizarre hair color and piercings are not so outside the norm in most metropolitan areas. You may be denied service in Quitman, Ms if you tried to board a bus there. Again, right or wrong, it is a consequence you accept when you step so outside the social norm as to make others feel uncomfortable or threatened. Accepting the consequences of social norms isn't always a good thing. We know this for a fact - the social norms of colored and white bathrooms shouldn't have been accepted. The social norms of a woman having to wear a skirt so many inches below her knees or getting in trouble at her college shouldn't have been accepted. When my mother was in college, she would get in serious trouble if she wore pants without a picnic basket in her hand, it couldn't be two feet away, it had to be in her hand, wearing a skirt too short or being out too late. I'd like to think we know better now. What magically makes things so different than a woman wearing pants in a time where that wasn't the social norm?
|
|
|
|