Mercnbeth -> RE: Who is required to, or requires his/her slave to speak in 3rd person? (1/29/2008 4:56:22 AM)
|
accepting restrictions on speech was a part of the process of becoming His (non-Gorean) slave. as a posession, removing the words "I", "me", "mine" and "my" from vocabulary because they are now inappropriate, doesn't just entail substituting "this slave's" for those particular words, however. this slave endeavors to refer to folks by name, and if she uses a posessive pronoun in conversation, it is to highlight the OTHER person's connection---for example: when talking about Master to His offspring, this slave refers to Him as "Your Father", not "MY (or "this slave's") Master". it has been a long process~this slave still gets to talking too fast and "I" and "my" just pop out, even talking with Master!!! it's easier to edit your speech in the written form, but it can be very mind wrenching to do it out loud. and Master likes mind wrenching. a lot.[:)] as far as if it is common...not in this slave's experience. quote:
My master would like me to do it and I don't feel like it's still me talking, like I can't truely express myself honestly and emotionally in this manner... Any thoughts to that as well? losing "MYself" is one of Master's goals. speech restriction has been a useful tool, for us, in getting this slave there.
|
|
|
|