Reigna
Posts: 334
Joined: 8/27/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: PhoenixRed ... Of all the CDs I know, about half are bisexual, having encounters with either men or women. However, a number of the rest, when they crossdress, are only interested in being with women sexually. Effectively then, when they are dressed they are "lesbian". Here's what I've been wondering. Since these men are pre-op or not considering gender reassignment at all, then sex with a woman is "technically" the same as their hetero interactions, just with a totally different mindset, while in their femme personna? Would this be a plausible line of reasoning? Speaking as the genetically female half of such a couple--and as one who knows a number of women like me--I'd say the answer is yes and no. Yes, sex is technically the same; but no, the actual mechanics tend to vary in ways they probably wouldn't if the male didn't have gender issues. This can be very upsetting to a vanilla woman, incidentally. The consensus among the women I know--the kinky and the vanilla--is that standard genital-to-genital intercourse is on the menu less often. Strap-on sex is a given; some like to play with vibrators. The mindset is different, too. These men, after all, fantasize that they are female, and this too can be upsetting to a certain kind of genetic woman. On the other hand, if both parties are on board, they might pretend to be lesbians, or engage in humiliation games because he's such a sissy and enjoys being treated like a girl--penetrated, vibed, etc. One result can be a lot of anguished attempts at coming up with a good label. Is this a lesbian couple? A heterosexual couple? Or what? A lot of us just label ourselves "queer" and move on.
< Message edited by Reigna -- 2/26/2008 9:59:43 PM >
|