RE: Thread Hijacking

RE: Thread Hijacking (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid

Message

sweetwenchie -> RE: Thread Hijacking (2/3/2008 2:52:58 AM)
errrr next verse same as the first This is the thread that never ends... Ah hell, at 3am it's a miracle i can even type let alone think. [8\|]

Jeffff -> RE: Thread Hijacking (2/3/2008 7:29:00 AM)
Holy shit!...take a couple of days off and........wow My name is Jeff, and I am a hijacker. I have learned that it is not as funny as I thought it was. I will endevour to limit it from now on. For all the feelings I have hurt.............Oh well........... Jeff

KatyLied -> RE: Thread Hijacking (2/3/2008 7:31:27 AM)
quote: For all the feelings I have hurt.............Oh well........... You suck at sincerity.

ModeratorEleven -> RE: Thread Hijacking (2/3/2008 7:33:26 AM)
Ok children, that's enough. XI

Mercnbeth -> RE: Thread Hijacking (2/3/2008 7:41:52 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ModeratorEleven Ok children, that's enough. XI Hijack - Isn't discussing "children" against TOS? Shouldn't that have been; "Ok UM's, that's enough!"? But we all know the reference being pointed to when UM is used anyway. So even if we used disjointed letters, yet we all knew that 'XL#$^@DR^IDL' meant 'children' - whoops meant UM. the thought is still against TOS. It gets to the attempt at "thought policing". The Mods have to consider what is in our 'thought' and police it. Police brutality is a ongoing problem. We've seen people TAZERED for no good reason. It's created a tee shirt - 'Please Don't TAZ Me Bro!' The 'right' would like to inhibit our ability to wear a tee shirt like that - finding it offensive to mock a policeman, especially one wearing an American Flag on their sleeve. Yet the left says we have a Constitutional right to burn the flag. It was those people who voted and got us George Bush in the White House. Therefore if it wasn't for George Bush - there'd be no thread hijacking!

IrishMist -> RE: Thread Hijacking (2/3/2008 8:03:42 AM)
LMAO Merc that was great [:D]

ModeratorEleven -> RE: Thread Hijacking (2/3/2008 8:15:17 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth Hijack - Isn't discussing "children" against TOS? Indeed it is. Unfortunately, some "adults" don't seem to be able to avoid acting like children. quote: It gets to the attempt at "thought policing". The Mods have to consider what is in our 'thought' and police it. No, we don't. What's in your thoughts isn't anyone's concern but your own. What's being judged is your behavior, same as always. XI

domahpet -> RE: Thread Hijacking (2/3/2008 8:21:02 AM)
who exactly was doing what wrong? this is an off topic discussion, isnt it? we're seriously gonna need an updated list of rules

lusciouslips19 -> RE: Thread Hijacking (2/3/2008 8:28:17 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: domahpet who exactly was doing what wrong? this is an off topic discussion, isnt it? we're seriously gonna need an updated list of rules quote: Jeffff titleAndStar(1511,0,0,false,"","")Evil Posts: 1511 Joined: 7/7/2007 Status: online Holy shit!...take a couple of days off and........wow My name is Jeff, and I am a hijacker. I have learned that it is not as funny as I thought it was. I will How can off topic discussions violate anything?

kittinSol -> RE: Thread Hijacking (2/3/2008 8:36:31 AM)
Right, well, it looks as though the whole issue's taken far too seriously. It's a website, nobody forces us to participate, and the rules aren't ours to make. There's obviously a buffer zone that allows for off tangent posts to be made during a discussion - let's enjoy it, and not contravene the rules by taking over threads in order to pursue our own agendas. I'm still puzzled over the so-called factions that have been fighting over this, and over the zealoussness with which people defend their positions: talking about positions, everyone should bend over... now... [8D]

KatyLied -> RE: Thread Hijacking (2/3/2008 8:43:36 AM)
I think thread jacking/flirting is supposed to be in the random section. I'm guessing if this was in random there would be more leeway. Although I'm as confused as others.

SL4V3M4YB3 -> RE: Thread Hijacking (2/3/2008 8:50:28 AM)
People have basically admitted bullying in this thread so I don't see how they are so clueless to see what they are doing wrong. I M O S H O.[:D]

Jeffff -> RE: Thread Hijacking (2/3/2008 8:54:23 AM)
Define bullying?.... are we all so sensative that sarcasm is no longer at all acceptable?. Jeff

SL4V3M4YB3 -> RE: Thread Hijacking (2/3/2008 8:56:44 AM)
Did I mention your name Mr Jeffff, is the Moderator picking on you? Awww poor baby.[:D]

Jeffff -> RE: Thread Hijacking (2/3/2008 9:06:30 AM)
No you didn't.....:)...and incidently... I can take it......lol. It was a serious question?. And yes...ModXI and I have danced a bit. I have never questioned her authority, or her responsibilty. I may question her, decisions, but when it comes down to it. I would not wish to be a Mod here. Jeff

SL4V3M4YB3 -> RE: Thread Hijacking (2/3/2008 9:12:36 AM)
Well then you understand the pointlessness of this because in the most simple terms regardless of whether or not they think they are right, they are wrong and that is all that matters in the end.

kittinSol -> RE: Thread Hijacking (2/3/2008 9:13:35 AM)
Hmmmm... it DOES seem as though some people are prepared to dish it out, but aren't quite ready to eat what's given to them in return [:D] . But do we really care? No [;)] .

Jeffff -> RE: Thread Hijacking (2/3/2008 9:19:29 AM)
This is where you and I will have to agree to disagree. No one, is above mocking, myself included. Differing view points are a part of life. If a person is willing to take an imovable stance, that person should be take to take the heat too. Jeff

KatyLied -> RE: Thread Hijacking (2/3/2008 9:22:27 AM)
Que sera sera.....

fluffyswitch -> RE: Thread Hijacking (2/3/2008 9:26:45 AM)
honestly i'm still looking for ashton kuscher, if i've just been punked. sorry told you i was pissy today...

Page: << < prev 15 16 [17] 18 19 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

2.734375E-02