MissMorrigan
Posts: 2309
Joined: 1/15/2005 Status: offline
|
Before long, i can see there being a collarme quiz night lol I don't consider academic people more 'intelligent' as such, I have had people with street smarts/savvy run rings around me (that's not difficult given the only time I move quickly is when a doughnut is involved). But one does expect there to be a certain standard in school regarding children's education. I grew up a right old tomboy grease monkey. I loved working in my father's garages (he had several including showrooms in/around london). I rarely spent a day in a classroom from the age of six until thirteen and then was thrust into the shocking environment of a catholic convent school. Despite the hard work I did put into my studies, I was never 'accepted', always an outcast who never fit in. Even though I rarely went to school until the age of 13, I educated myself, I read avidly and one of the punishments I was given at the convent, by the teacher who wanted to belittle me and make an example of me, was to transcribe a work of shakespeare into modern day English. I had six weeks to do that in. I achieved it, received no recognition other than criticism that I must have acquired the help of someone else to do the work for me. I sat to the back of the class, which gave me perfect opportunity to simply observe my class peers. Those, who were either exceedingly clever and ahead of the curriculum, and those with special needs and/or remedial requirements, were left by the wayside and focus was placed on the mainstream children. The majority of my peers went on to become successful, largely due to familial connections/influence and opportunity created by their wealth - of which I do not begrudge any of them. Some others went on to achieve success in their own right, their path there harder and taking far longer to achieve. I do wonder, though, how many of those girls would have succeeded had they not their privileged backgrounds.
|