sirguym
Posts: 318
Joined: 8/10/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: softness flip it around ... i spend my days being highly Dominant, I am good at my job because I control the flow of power, my career depends on me maintaing the balance of power always in my favour ... now am i like that just to survive? .. or is my homelife submission just a counter balance to my worklifeDominance? ... which is the true me? because they are *both* me ... neither one of them is a front or a cover or a mask for the other ... just as those "seemingly" Dominant men in the workplace may lick their Mistresses boots ... I control a roomful of people with a flick of my eyebrow .. and two hours later beg to be granted a dog bowl for my dinner I believe that is absolutely the key to reconciling my position and Stephann's. I do not believe there is a real contradiction between the two of us. We all seek a balance in our lives, and for some that means going ultra-Dom in public, and ultra-sub in private; or vice versa. (By no means all, of course.) But it explains why I can see apparent submissives in a majority at eg Night Of The Cane, a fairly serious corporal punishment event; but most male Councillors in the bear-pit of a debating chamber when I was in politics being apparently Dom. I tend to think, living in the lifestyle, that their behaviour in the scene club is the 'true' nature. But I am also willing to take seriously anybody who suggests that if you took the pressure off the public Dom/private sub so that they could be sub in public without penalty, that they'd spring back and go all Dom in private ...
|