MissMagnolia
Posts: 3636
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: hardbodysub
quote:
ORIGINAL: MissMagnolia
quote:
ORIGINAL: hardbodysub
quote:
ORIGINAL: littlesarbonn
You nailed it, littlesarbonn.
It's ludicrous to conceive of any guy wanting to simply do housework, with nothing else involved, for a so-called dominant who does absolutely nothing to create and nurture a D/s relationship. If such guys exist at all, there can't be more than a few of them.
The replies regarding the sub's desire or need to serve the Master/Mistress unconditionally, ala the "true submissive", via this no-strings housework are pretty one-dimensional, ignoring what it takes to be considered Master/Mistress in the first place. It's a different story if the domme/sub dynamic is already established between the two people, but for a dominant to expect this out of the blue from a stranger is pretty absurd.
YOU may find it ludicrous, many do not. You and littlesarbonn may be in complete agreement, but guess what? There are millions who disagree and adore simply serving. I have met many subs who love serving in any way, because it brings them joy, they love to get a smile and a thank you and they feel useful. Not you kink? Who cares? Don't knock other peoples kinks.
The replies given may be one dimensional to YOU. I see people responding fully to the original question of this thread. In your ever so vast experience of being a Master/Mistress, I'm happy that you know that you are the one person in the universe who can define what constitutes a M/s dynamic. Oh, hang on you don't.
YOU are the only one bring up the "twue submissive" term. What is submission to you, may be nothing whatsoever like submission to half the population. There was also no mention in the OP of a long term D/s relationship, or of a short term one. The OP asked a question that was answered. Whether you like the answers or not is immaterial. Whether you agree or not is also immaterial.
OP, you will find that the majority of Dommes will be very clear on what is expected and what is not, before you even getting to the house. No Domme will tell you that a scene will ensue once the laundry is done, if that is not the case. No Domme will expect you to clean until you drop, or miss work, or anything else of that nature. Dommes are human beings who, believe it or not, have a full comprehension of human emotions and physiological limits. If you are unclear on something when a Domme requests something of you, ask her what she meant. It's that simple. Dommes are more than ready to tell you what they mean, to avoid confusion. We know that you can't possibly read minds. Just ask.
The size of the chip on your shoulder never ceases to amaze me. If you exercised just a lick of objectivity and logic, you might recognize several things:
(1) I did not presume to speak for anyone but myself.
(2) You, on the other hand, do presume to speak for not only yourself, but for all dommes, as well as "millions" who you insist agree with you.
(3) Your response to the "true submissive" reference makes no sense. Of course I was the first to mention it in this thread; I was clearly drawing a parallel between that concept and the "no strings" idea.
(4) The same goes for your comment about a D/s relationship not being mentioned in the OP. So what? My point was that the existence or lack of such a relationship can have a bearing on the definition and understanding of "no strings".
(5) I don't have any less right to state my opinions than you do. You don't like this. Too bad.
(6) A review of the other responses in this thread reveals that there is a large range of opinions regarding "No Strings". You're not the only one whose opinion counts.
(7) Your lack of ability to recognize the relevance of (3), (4), and (5), and (6) is immaterial. And astounding.
Have a nice day!
As I have said before, in threads other than this, you presume to think you speak for other subs. Only ONE agreed with you. You are so far off the mark it isn't funny. You can state all you like, but I also have the option of telling you that you know nothing much, apart from your own inflated sense of self. Funnily enough, I think I have a fairer idea of the ways a Domme thinks than a sub male, unless you also have a vagina and are in fact a female and a Domme? As you seem a little thick, I will reiterate, slowly and in BIG letters. I remarked on the the responses of the Dommes in this thread, to the question posed by the OP. Get it? THIS THREAD?? OP??SEE???
Where you got the idea that I dislike you having an opinion, I don't know. Believe it or not, your "opinions" are of little importance to me. I admit, I don't like you personally, because you act like an arrogant, know it all, arsehole in every thread I've seen you post on. You come up with irrelevant points, you pinpoint on remarks that were made in reference to a completely different matter, you have Domme bashed on more than one occasion and seem to actually dislike women. Are you sure you're not a closet misogynist? In almost every post I've ever seen of yours, you're bitching about what a Domme did wrong, what a Domme did to piss you off, blah, blah, blah. I think you just don't like being called on the bullshit you spout. And by a woman. Oh god!! How dare she?
As I clearly said, it's not YOUR kink, but it is the kink of MANY. Don't knock someone elses kinks.
Get over yourself little fellow, grow a brain, get a clue and stop trying to speak for ANYONE. When males such as you learn to listen, perhaps you would have more luck in finding a Domme.
Oh, and do try very, very hard to stick to the thread subject matter in future.
< Message edited by MissMagnolia -- 2/7/2008 3:01:22 AM >
_____________________________
if at first you dont succeed..then skydiving isnt for you
Resident Whip Cracker AND Resident Orbs Of Joy.
|
RE: What does 'No Strings' Housework mean anyway? - 
Profile
...awww shucks...now i can't play games anymore
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread