darchChylde -> RE: my right to babytalk (2/7/2008 3:57:18 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: orfunboi quote:
ORIGINAL: darchChylde quote:
ORIGINAL: bethylovescuddle I find most adult chat full of pisstakers and wankers which is probably a bigger problem. My point is no one should be criticised for how they talk and who they are. Is it just me, or are these two conflicting sentences? i believe that the main issue of using baby-talk or any other kind of irregular affected speach pattern in a "normal" thread is that you are inflicting your kink upon others without their consent. Such a thing is actually one of the greater offenses in the community. How is she doing this? She has posted in 3 threads so far. Her introduction, this thread and she made a comment on a ongoing thread ( and responded like an adult) How is this inflicting her kink on anyone? Did someone force you to read this thread or her introduction? Not sure what you mean.... i personally did not read her introduction, or any of her other posts but those in this thread. i did not accuse her of anything, but spoke with the general "you" in referring to the act of using affected speech in an adult forum; which you would have understood if you had read my statement in context instead of latching on to one sentence fragment and running with it. If you're not sure what i mean, read my previous post again; as a whole. If you are still confused, so be it. Edited to add: quote:
ORIGINAL: batshalom He means speaking in babytalk in general, exposing others to one's personal kink. It would hold true for a lot of things, like exposing oneself in public or subjecting "innocent bystanders" to your kink for roman showers. He didn't mean right now specifically. batshalom, i caught this after i finished posting my own response; thanks for beating me to the punch. i probably would have gotten it out before you if i didn't waste so much time typing nastiness that i later deleted before posting.
|
|
|
|