Hippiekinkster -> RE: Before you Vote for Billary? (2/15/2008 11:20:11 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: carlie310 I hoped that you were going to give a legal explanation rather than just tell me what you'd say general welfare means, so if you could take another stab at it, that'd be great. But you might want to take a look at Federalist Paper #41, which disagrees with what you'd say. Yes, I do appreciate the link to the single-payor site, since it saved me the trouble of looking it up. I haven't researched that enough to know whether I think it's a solution--I've said a couple of times in this thread I thought it was worth investigating. Since I clicked the link, I assume that disqualifies me as "rightie" in your book, so I'll skip over your ad hominems for now, 'mkay? (Keep them up, and I will get bored and wander away. If you want to debate my political leanings, you just might have to do that alone.) And lastly, the Dept of Education (which I intended to change the NCLB reference to, but forgot, I'm sorry) & the other gov't programs I mentioned were shit before Daddy Bush was in office, let alone W. He didn't help, but his messes weren't the beginning. Medicare's problems aren't solely actuarial, and I'd hesitate to hold them up as your example. Or was that your intent? Oh, I know that Medicare has other problems. The biggest problem I see, though, is the same one SS faces: an increasing number of retirees, and a decreasing number of worker-bees. There really isn't a US equivalent to the Canadian or British or French systems. Medicare comes closest, as far as I can tell. I suppose one could have to decide what one wants from any governmental agency: efficiency or effectiveness? FEMA was neither for Katrina, Nor have been most governmental agencies. I lay the lion's share of blame at Bush's doorstep, as it was he who turned the government into a pig trough for his cronies much more than any President in the 20th century that I am aware of. I'll look at the Federalist Paper tomorrow. Seems to me, though, that one could make the case that what the 10th amendment allows or doesn't allow is also a matter of personal interpretation.
|
|
|
|