Alumbrado
Posts: 5560
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MollHackabout quote:
ORIGINAL: Alumbrado That isn't what I said. The assertion was that no TA was ever good enough to teach certain people any undergrad material. I pointed out that such blanket statements can reflect naivete. Also, you are incorrect when you suggest that I said there was anything trivial about intro coursework... it is what it is. There may be better uses for a faculty member's time, or there may be persons better suited to teach the basics. First-year students are often the most precariously situated, as they are in a transitional period. They are generally the students who require the most skillful and attentive teaching to ease this. So when you ask "What have most undergrads done to deserve taking a faculty member away from their research and other work to teach intro material? ", and diminish the importance of intro classes, it smacks of elitism. quote:
Another point I made was that the blanket 'all grad TAs are beneath me' ignores who many grad students really are. They could have much more real world experience than anyone on faculty. Would you rather have a 'real' professor who has never left campus, or some TA who has made a career out of practical applications, and is getting the doctorate to become faculty? I'd rather have a prof who doesn't have unreasonably high standards, as grad sessionals often do, without the teaching methods to warrant such results. I'm not saying all grad students are like this, but from my experience, an alarming number are. quote:
Which is why anyone who wants to learn something in school, instead of being babysat toward a scrap of paper, will be taking copious and useful notes, asking questions, going to office hours, finding a tutor, and forming study groups long before midterms roll around... you know, like they were involved in higher education or something... There's a difference between "not being babysat" and being alienated as a result lack of office hours, and inconsistent lecturers, because your lecturer got his buddy to talk while he studies for his comp...which seems to be the scenario being described. The blanket statement was made that no TAs were good enough to teach any class, by at least 2 people here, and it was that fallacy that I refuted. If you are going to defend that assertion, then do so without moving the goal posts to 'some TAs are no good'. And the notion you presented, that teaching undergraduate course work at the university level is the most important thing that faculty members can do, simply does not reflect reality. Would it be less elitist if the supercomputers, surgical breakthroughs, and theater departments suddenly fell of a tree by magic, and all that faculty had to do was liberate young minds? No doubt... let us know when you find a university like that in the real world.
|