Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: University Students: Test Question


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: University Students: Test Question Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: University Students: Test Question - 3/6/2008 2:18:51 PM   
whenstarscollide


Posts: 90
Joined: 11/24/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SugarMyChurro

I know several people at university right now. Most are in the middle of midterms exams, or just wrapping up. So here is my scenario:

-----

A chemistry midterm exam is given. The exam is 37 questions and 6 pages long. Each question has multiple parts and some are even essay style, short answer questions. There are some multiple choice questions, but almost all questions require at least some math and conversions. The math and conversions on the exam are often more difficult and seem to synthesize knowledge imparted during the lecture period leading to the exam - but the practice work during lectures and homework is never as hard as what is on the exam. The official time for the midterm is a single 50 minute class session, but the teacher allows students to arrive 30 minutes earlier and to stay 30 minutes later if they need to.

The chemistry class normally meets for three 50 minute sessions per week. The class is taught and the exam is given by a graduate student. This graduate student is known to take time away from class with substitute teachers filling in as he is also undergoing various evaluation processes toward a higher degree.

-----

It's been some time since I have been in school. Does that scenario sound familiar and fair to you? What might you do going forward? Presume that getting high marks is extremely important to you.




you basically described the exams i took when i was in organic chemistry, except maybe change the essay style questions to reaction diagrams...provided that the class is graded on a curve, this seems perfectly acceptable to me. painful, yes. and i would be spending a great deal of time reviewing the material with my professor during her office hours. but acceptable none the less.

(in reply to SugarMyChurro)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: University Students: Test Question - 3/6/2008 2:58:09 PM   
xxblushesxx


Posts: 9318
Joined: 11/3/2005
From: Kentucky
Status: offline
I would hope that the practice work and homework would be at least as difficult as what's on the exam.
I'm in midterms now, and they SUCK!

_____________________________

~Christina

A nice girl with a disturbing hobby

My femdom findom blog: http://www.MistressAvarice.com


(in reply to whenstarscollide)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: University Students: Test Question - 3/6/2008 4:09:17 PM   
Alumbrado


Posts: 5560
Status: offline
What have most undergrads done to deserve taking a faculty member away from their research and other work to teach intro material?  There are TA graduate students out there going back for their second masters or even doctorate, or teaching after 20+ years in the actual discipline.  Blanket boasts advertise ignorance like a neon sign.

The whole tenor of this thread reeks of 13 and 14th grade junior college gossip....'substitute teachers' in a university? No office hours?  Worrying about a mid-term being unfair? What did you do, change seats so that the substitute would call out the wrong names?

(in reply to DominorSomnium)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: University Students: Test Question - 3/6/2008 4:45:56 PM   
SugarMyChurro


Posts: 1912
Joined: 4/26/2007
Status: offline
FWIW, the class is not apparently graded on a curve.

-----

I am surprised that many think that a university education should be unreasonably hard. I think it should be hard to the point where one must immerse oneself in the material and actually learn it by rote, or nearly so. In some cases it may take 8-14 hours of work a day, 6 days a week. But unreasonably hard? In a word: no.

I went to a very prestigious school. I graduated with honors and still maintained a normal life. I considered my education both my full time and part time jobs. That's how long I needed to dedicate to classes and homework despite having a near photographic memory.

My education was not free and I wouldn't have wasted a dime or more than one intro class session on any profs that weren't committed to the task and perfectly reasonable in their expectations.

And anyone who knows anything, and for whom a solid GPA is the pass-key to post-grad or professional work, knows that anyone other than a full-time, possibly tenured professor is always a pain in the ass. Of anyone other than the ideal instructor I would say this: their lack of experience, their ridiculous expectations, their enormous ego issues, their narrow focus and combative nature, etc. will all add up to a bad educational experience. Interestingly, the very things that may make a terrific student are not the same qualities you want in an instructor. The instructor of any subject must be broad-minded and flexible enough to understand the changeable needs of the students and that each may have to come at a subject from different approaches. A good professor should know each path to success and can help each student along their chosen path.

It is the responsibility of the student to meet the professor at least half-way, get in the teacher's face, and ask for help when it is needed. If one plays the game well - and doing so is surely part of one's education - getting excellent teachers upward of 95% of the time is almost a certainty. I am also of the belief that a smart but pesky student can often transform a bad instructor into a better one if communication skills are good on both sides of that equation.

(in reply to Alumbrado)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: University Students: Test Question - 3/6/2008 5:40:14 PM   
DominorSomnium


Posts: 75
Joined: 1/6/2008
Status: offline
I've been in school on and off for a while now. In some cases I am older than a TA teaching. I am sorry, I did not sign up for college to be taught by a self important student. I came to college to be taught by a PROFESSOR. If faculty is too busy to teach, then make them unbusy. Research in the end is something that should be a reward, not a right. And I never have even stepped foot in a community college. Most teachers I have had are dedicated people who teach to teach, not to be famous for research. All of them have also had office hours, some not very accessable, but they had them. I am done now.

(in reply to Alumbrado)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: University Students: Test Question - 3/6/2008 6:48:32 PM   
MollHackabout


Posts: 38
Joined: 2/16/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alumbrado

What have most undergrads done to deserve taking a faculty member away from their research and other work to teach intro material? There are TA graduate students out there going back for their second masters or even doctorate, or teaching after 20+ years in the actual discipline. Blanket boasts advertise ignorance like a neon sign.



Teaching should not be secondary to research. Too many professors fall into this mentality. If you're not interested in teaching, there are many private sector and civil service research positions available.

Profs should take intro courses seriously, and should devote suitable time to meet with their students regarding this material. I don't see why you feel as though these courses should be understood as trivial - particularly as, presumably, every prof had to take an intro course or two to get where they are.

(in reply to Alumbrado)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: University Students: Test Question - 3/6/2008 7:16:17 PM   
Alumbrado


Posts: 5560
Status: offline
That isn't what I said.  The assertion was that no TA was ever good enough to teach certain people any undergrad material. I pointed out that such blanket statements can reflect naivete.
Also, you are incorrect when you suggest that I said there was anything trivial about intro coursework... it is what it is.  There may be better uses for a faculty member's time, or there may be persons better suited to teach the basics.

Research grants bring in a lot of money and other benefits to a school, as well as offsetting chunks of faculty salaries, equipment, RA stipends, and so forth.... not to mention the possible benefits of some of the research.
If someone wants to insist that faculty members must give that up to teach undergrads the basics, like high schools and junior colleges, what have they have given the university of equal value to replace the lost research and resources? Donated a supercomputer or a particle accelerator, or a state of the art operating facility, or a new theater space, or recording studio? 
I'll bet not.

Another point I made was that the blanket 'all grad TAs are beneath me' ignores who many grad students really are. They could have much more real world experience than anyone on faculty.
Would you rather have a 'real' professor who has never left campus, or some TA who has made a career out of practical applications, and is getting the doctorate to become faculty? 

And your last comment ignores the possibility that it may have been decades since certain faculty members took those intro classes, whereas the TA you are sneering at, could have been taking that class with much more current material ( ask anyone who has ever sat through an SPSS class where the professor was using the version they learned in school, instead of this year's version).


So again, the notion that a faculty member must be first and foremost a schoolmarm, is a distinctly high school/junior college conceit. 

Universities operate on an entirely different standard. Does that mean that there aren't plenty of lame TAs out there?  Of course there are...

Which is why anyone who wants to learn something in school, instead of being babysat toward a scrap of paper, will be taking copious and useful notes, asking questions, going to office hours, finding a tutor, and forming study groups long before midterms roll around... you know, like they were involved in higher education or something...

< Message edited by Alumbrado -- 3/6/2008 7:20:16 PM >

(in reply to MollHackabout)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: University Students: Test Question - 3/6/2008 10:12:50 PM   
Muttling


Posts: 1612
Joined: 9/30/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SugarMyChurro

Thanks for the many replies. I often post things that aren't about me, despite what some may think. And this wasn't about me.

I think the teaching seems scattered. It's clear that they don't have this guy's full attention as he pursues his own agenda.



It is not the professor's agenda, it is the university's agenda. 

Have you ever heard the phrase "publish or perish"?    Universities are research institutions first and teaching institutions second.   This is especially true when you talk about Freshman and Sophmore classes.  The juniors and seniors start to garnish a bit more attention, but little respect unti you hit graduate level.


His research, presentations, professional publications, and grant requests will get him a hell of a lot more at a boys from the university than any level of teaching in a freshman chemistry class.

(in reply to SugarMyChurro)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: University Students: Test Question - 3/6/2008 10:31:34 PM   
MollHackabout


Posts: 38
Joined: 2/16/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alumbrado

That isn't what I said. The assertion was that no TA was ever good enough to teach certain people any undergrad material. I pointed out that such blanket statements can reflect naivete.
Also, you are incorrect when you suggest that I said there was anything trivial about intro coursework... it is what it is. There may be better uses for a faculty member's time, or there may be persons better suited to teach the basics.



First-year students are often the most precariously situated, as they are in a transitional period. They are generally the students who require the most skillful and attentive teaching to ease this. So when you ask "What have most undergrads done to deserve taking a faculty member away from their research and other work to teach intro material? ", and diminish the importance of intro classes, it smacks of elitism.

quote:


Another point I made was that the blanket 'all grad TAs are beneath me' ignores who many grad students really are. They could have much more real world experience than anyone on faculty.
Would you rather have a 'real' professor who has never left campus, or some TA who has made a career out of practical applications, and is getting the doctorate to become faculty?


I'd rather have a prof who doesn't have unreasonably high standards, as grad sessionals often do, without the teaching methods to warrant such results.
I'm not saying all grad students are like this, but from my experience, an alarming number are.

quote:



Which is why anyone who wants to learn something in school, instead of being babysat toward a scrap of paper, will be taking copious and useful notes, asking questions, going to office hours, finding a tutor, and forming study groups long before midterms roll around... you know, like they were involved in higher education or something...


There's a difference between "not being babysat" and being alienated as a result lack of office hours, and inconsistent lecturers, because your lecturer got his buddy to talk while he studies for his comp...which seems to be the scenario being described.

(in reply to Alumbrado)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: University Students: Test Question - 3/6/2008 10:32:31 PM   
LuckyAlbatross


Posts: 19224
Joined: 10/25/2005
Status: offline
At my university, all professors were required to have at least two open office hours on campus each week for students to be able to come and talk about anything with their classes. 

But some profs are still dicks and hardasses (sometimes those were the best ones) so there you go.

I found almost all courses in college if you did the basic level of study- follow the syllabus, go to all the classes, do the homework, you'd almost definitely get a B.  Do some real extra effort, you'd get an A.  But for some classes, they will kick your ass and you will kill yourself just to pass.  That's life.

< Message edited by LuckyAlbatross -- 3/6/2008 10:33:48 PM >


_____________________________

Find stable partners, not a stable of partners.

"Sometimes my whore logic gets all fuzzy"- Californication

(in reply to SageFemmexx)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: University Students: Test Question - 3/7/2008 2:38:12 AM   
subboi3382


Posts: 379
Joined: 8/4/2005
Status: offline
sounds about right, maybe a little hard, though i havnt taken any chem classes

(in reply to SageFemmexx)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: University Students: Test Question - 3/7/2008 5:09:34 AM   
Alumbrado


Posts: 5560
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MollHackabout


quote:

ORIGINAL: Alumbrado

That isn't what I said. The assertion was that no TA was ever good enough to teach certain people any undergrad material. I pointed out that such blanket statements can reflect naivete.
Also, you are incorrect when you suggest that I said there was anything trivial about intro coursework... it is what it is. There may be better uses for a faculty member's time, or there may be persons better suited to teach the basics.



First-year students are often the most precariously situated, as they are in a transitional period. They are generally the students who require the most skillful and attentive teaching to ease this. So when you ask "What have most undergrads done to deserve taking a faculty member away from their research and other work to teach intro material? ", and diminish the importance of intro classes, it smacks of elitism.

quote:


Another point I made was that the blanket 'all grad TAs are beneath me' ignores who many grad students really are. They could have much more real world experience than anyone on faculty.
Would you rather have a 'real' professor who has never left campus, or some TA who has made a career out of practical applications, and is getting the doctorate to become faculty?


I'd rather have a prof who doesn't have unreasonably high standards, as grad sessionals often do, without the teaching methods to warrant such results.
I'm not saying all grad students are like this, but from my experience, an alarming number are.

quote:



Which is why anyone who wants to learn something in school, instead of being babysat toward a scrap of paper, will be taking copious and useful notes, asking questions, going to office hours, finding a tutor, and forming study groups long before midterms roll around... you know, like they were involved in higher education or something...


There's a difference between "not being babysat" and being alienated as a result lack of office hours, and inconsistent lecturers, because your lecturer got his buddy to talk while he studies for his comp...which seems to be the scenario being described.


The blanket statement was made that no TAs were good enough to teach any class, by at least 2 people here, and it was that fallacy that I refuted.
If you are going to defend that assertion, then do so without moving the goal posts to 'some TAs are no good'.

And the notion you presented, that teaching undergraduate course work at the university level  is the most important thing that  faculty members can do, simply does not reflect reality. 
Would it be less elitist if the supercomputers, surgical breakthroughs, and theater departments suddenly fell of a tree by magic, and all that faculty had to do was liberate young minds? 

No doubt... let us know when you find a university like that in the real world.

(in reply to MollHackabout)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: University Students: Test Question - 3/7/2008 10:41:55 AM   
MollHackabout


Posts: 38
Joined: 2/16/2008
Status: offline
quote:


The blanket statement was made that no TAs were good enough to teach any class, by at least 2 people here, and it was that fallacy that I refuted.
If you are going to defend that assertion, then do so without moving the goal posts to 'some TAs are no good'.


I'm not saying that no TAs are good enough for their jobs. I'm also making a distinction between TAs and grad sessional lecturers here, as is the language that is used where I am located. I just want for this to be clear - a TA is someone who provides tutorials or seminars in addition to lectures given by a faculty member. A grad sessional has been assigned full responsibility for the course. I just want to be sure we're using the same language here.

Sure, I contend that there's a problematic culture among grad students. You can take that or leave it. This is coupled with a level of inexperience, which is harder to deny. And fine, you can speak all you want about how many grads are back for extra grad work after decades in the field, and incredible life experience, but surely this is the minority. So what I'm saying here is I understand why people find grad sessionals problematic, particularly in this day and age where post-secondary is prohibitively expensive. I expect to see someone capable and attentive in the classroom.

I don't agree that all grads are ill-equipped to be sessionals - but I'd like to see some compelling reasons as to why they should be in the classroom before completing their qualifications, beyond bureaucratic logic.


quote:


And the notion you presented, that teaching undergraduate course work at the university level is the most important thing that faculty members can do, simply does not reflect reality.


Is the most important thing they can do teach senior-level courses, wherein students are much less likely to need the same level of pedagogic competency from an instructor? I am also operating under the assumption that profs are under a requirement to teach - maybe things are different where you are, and tenured faculty do nothing but research.

quote:


Would it be less elitist if the supercomputers, surgical breakthroughs, and theater departments suddenly fell of a tree by magic, and all that faculty had to do was liberate young minds?

No doubt... let us know when you find a university like that in the real world.


Let's take faculty out of the classroom altogether, then!

If it's inappropriate to have a faculty member in the class because of research obligations, then why is it appropriate to have a grad lecturer in the class, who presumably has a similar level of obligations to meet? If a grad can be expected to write a dissertation in the allotted two year period while teaching, surely a prof can manage to do a substantial amount of research while lecturing?


< Message edited by MollHackabout -- 3/7/2008 10:42:56 AM >

(in reply to Alumbrado)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: University Students: Test Question - 3/7/2008 3:51:20 PM   
Vendaval


Posts: 10297
Joined: 1/15/2005
Status: offline
I agree with Muttling here.  Much of what is being described is the hierarchy and goals within the Ivory Tower.  The lower a student is on that hierarchy, the more they are less likely to receive strong support or attention.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Muttling

Have you ever heard the phrase "publish or perish"?    Universities are research institutions first and teaching institutions second.   This is especially true when you talk about Freshman and Sophmore classes.  The juniors and seniors start to garnish a bit more attention, but little respect unti you hit graduate level.


His research, presentations, professional publications, and grant requests will get him a hell of a lot more at a boys from the university than any level of teaching in a freshman chemistry class.


_____________________________

"Beware, the woods at night, beware the lunar light.
So in this gray haze we'll be meating again, and on that
great day, I will tease you all the same."
"WOLF MOON", OCTOBER RUST, TYPE O NEGATIVE


http://KinkMeet.co.uk

(in reply to Muttling)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: University Students: Test Question - 3/7/2008 4:13:13 PM   
Muttling


Posts: 1612
Joined: 9/30/2007
Status: offline
Another point that hasn't been discussed here is how prepared are college level instructors to teach?


The VAST majority of them have no formal training in the art of teaching.  They have been given a syllabus of things that are to be taught and told to go teach it.   While they typically know the material quite well, it is rare to find one who is anywhere near the skill level of a elementary or high school teacher.




On the subject of only having PhD's teach a class, it really is a silly statement.  I have been in classes taught by everything from grad students to professors with several PhDs.   I have seen folks at all levels who were tremendously good and who were tremendously bad.   It really depends on the individual and whether or not they are truely interested in their students.

(in reply to Vendaval)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: University Students: Test Question - 3/7/2008 4:18:26 PM   
Alumbrado


Posts: 5560
Status: offline
quote:

(MH)If it's inappropriate to have a faculty member in the class because of research obligations, then why is it appropriate to have a grad lecturer in the class, who presumably has a similar level of obligations to meet? If a grad can be expected to write a dissertation in the allotted two year period while teaching, surely a prof can manage to do a substantial amount of research while lecturing?



Presumably?  Presumed by whom?

Again, idealistic  suggestions are fine,  but the reality of how a university treats money and time is far different, particularly at an R1 school..
For example, once a faculty member has spent months writing a grant proposal, and gets the money and equipment, they are obligated to give up part of their salary to the school, since a specific percentage of their work time is now bought and paid for by the soft money. What you are suggesting would be criminal fraud.

(in reply to Vendaval)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: University Students: Test Question - 3/7/2008 4:44:09 PM   
Muttling


Posts: 1612
Joined: 9/30/2007
Status: offline
quote:

(MH)If it's inappropriate to have a faculty member in the class because of research obligations, then why is it appropriate to have a grad lecturer in the class, who presumably has a similar level of obligations to meet? If a grad can be expected to write a dissertation in the allotted two year period while teaching, surely a prof can manage to do a substantial amount of research while lecturing?


Graduate students are NOT required to teach courses.  They volunteer to do it to earn extra money.  If they are really lucky, they can get on as a research assistant and do research that is directly related to their dissertation.  RAs don't make crap for money but the work load is a lot less.

Professors are required to teach a certain number of courses and there is an expectation for them to teach several.  However, I have known professors who only taught 1 or 2 courses for an entire year because they brought in massive amounts of grant money.  Heck, I knew of one who went for two years before the university made him teach a course and then it was a graduate level environmental chemistry course.  (He was also a horrible instructor and everyone was better off with him not being in the classroom.) 


(in reply to Alumbrado)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: University Students: Test Question - 3/7/2008 5:00:21 PM   
MollHackabout


Posts: 38
Joined: 2/16/2008
Status: offline
quote:


Presumably? Presumed by whom?


Uhm, presumed by the fact that not only am I under the burden to write a dissertation, but I'm also expected to publish throughout the process and attend conferences, so that maybe someday I can actually get a job. Which would appear to be a similar workload, but maybe I'm delusional.

quote:


Again, idealistic suggestions are fine, but the reality of how a university treats money and time is far different, particularly at an R1 school..
For example, once a faculty member has spent months writing a grant proposal, and gets the money and equipment, they are obligated to give up part of their salary to the school, since a specific percentage of their work time is now bought and paid for by the soft money. What you are suggesting would be criminal fraud.



Look, I'm not completely ignorant as to the operation of universities. Maybe things are different here, and I know my federal grant money (SSHRC) limits the amount of time I am allowed to TA, even as a lowly PhD candidate. What I'm suggesting actually isn't criminal fraud - what I am suggesting is taking profs away from the upper-level classes that they so adore, and maybe have them spend some time with the kids who are probably having the toughest time. And, you know, maybe hire more faculty, particularly where staff salaries are being partially provisioned through grants, rather than bringing in grads.



(in reply to Alumbrado)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: University Students: Test Question - 3/7/2008 5:06:23 PM   
MollHackabout


Posts: 38
Joined: 2/16/2008
Status: offline
quote:


Graduate students are NOT required to teach courses. They volunteer to do it to earn extra money. If they are really lucky, they can get on as a research assistant and do research that is directly related to their dissertation. RAs don't make crap for money but the work load is a lot less.


This depends on the institution, and what you understand as being "required". I know at a local university (University of Toronto), in some programs it's expected that by your fourth year you will have designed a syllabus and taught a course, particularly in those programs lacking in faculty. Is it a "requirement"? No - not if you don't care about ever getting a recommendation from anyone in the department....

As an aside, in Canada RAs are paid at a rate commensurate with acting as a TA or a sessional, generally around $30-$40 per hour. Hell, I made $35 an hour as an RA while just doing an MA. I guess we've got it better here....

(in reply to Muttling)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: University Students: Test Question - 3/7/2008 5:57:25 PM   
ThinkingKitten


Posts: 447
Joined: 6/15/2006
From: Ontari-ari-o
Status: offline
I agree. I attended a Canadian university and  took two full chem courses in my first year. The lecture portions were all taught by tenured profs, and TA's (doctoral students) did the lab portions. The exams were meant to weed the sheep from the goats, and they certainly did that. They met your scenario exactly. If you had done the work, they were reasonable exams, if you hadn't done the work, you were screwed. I found the prof's reasonably accessible for the one or two occasions when I wanted to talk to them, and otherwise there were nearly always grad students around to consult with. I had no complaints.

_____________________________

Thinking Kitten

If you can't stand the heat... tell the chef to get out of the kitchen.

(in reply to MollHackabout)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: University Students: Test Question Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109