RE: Marines and a puppy (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


Invictus754 -> RE: Marines and a puppy (3/5/2008 10:07:14 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: GreedyTop

quote:

ORIGINAL: Invictus754
Of course they are trained that way - but this video was taken out of context.  Seventeen seconds of "omygod!" and there is no way we know what happened before it to say why he did it.  In true CM style, however, everyone jumps to conclusions and wishes the soldier dead.  How the heck did a puppy appear out of nowhere?  I doubt the Marine carried him for miles just hoping to be near a cliff sometime to throw him over it.  Maybe if the puppy's owner and mother had been killed, and the pup would have starved to death?  Would that have been more humane to let the little fucker die in the Iraqi desert heat from starvation?  None of you thought of THAT, I bet!  Maybe killing the dog was the best thing for it. 
:: snip ::



Let's say that is the case.. there are certainly more humane ways to do it than toss it off a cliff.

If I were in a war type situation (like this man) I wouldn't be wasting a bullet on a dog - to kill it "humanely"- that I might need later on an armed combatant.  The dog was dead instantly and didn't suffer - how humane is that? 
 
Everyone's reaction would have been different if the guy had been crying and said to the camera "I ... I have to kill this poor little guy because his family was killed by a suicide bomber and ... and... I can't keep him in the combat zone ... but I want to take him home to my son Bobby ... Bobby loves puppies ..."  (wipes tears off face) "... but the poor little guy is too young to fend for himself and will starve to death out here.  My Commanding officer told me that I can't waste ammunition, so I have to do it quickly and this is the only way I know how." After throwing him, he breaks down in tears, sobbing for the poor pup whose life ended all too quickly...
 
Everyone would be sending his son puppies and cards and saying what a great guy he was for finding a quick way to take care of ending the situation.  Since he wasn't crying, people think the soldier is a worthless fuck.  To all of you: Fuck you.  This guy probably hates to be over there in the first place, probably hates doing what he did, but he is in a pretty fucked up place and most likely this is his way of dealing with it without putting a gun in his mouth or going on a shooting rampage. 
 
It was a puppy.  It is dead.  But you can console yourself that its death allowed many, many flies to live a long glorious life so its death wasn't in vain.  The circle of life continues.
 
Ye godz - if this made so many people upset, they should seek counseling.




GreedyTop -> RE: Marines and a puppy (3/5/2008 10:11:46 PM)

Who said shoot the puppy? Snap the neck.. certainly more instantaneous than tossing it off a cliff, where it may or may not have died instantly.




celticlord2112 -> RE: Marines and a puppy (3/5/2008 10:12:24 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Invictus754

quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol
Nod... if that's what he did to a puppy, I shudder to think what he'd do to a human being. It's abhorrent, and war makes people do disgusting things they probably wouldn't do otherwise.


Although what he did was cruel to the puppy (if this actually is a video that hasn't been doctored), I want the cruel ones in the service defending the US.



No, you wouldn't. Someone like that will fuck up and get you killed.

Macho killing bullshit sounds great if your in a bar chugging beer and hoping to find a piece. In combat it adds your friends to the daily casualty lists.




SugarMyChurro -> RE: Marines and a puppy (3/5/2008 10:13:14 PM)

I didn't read the whole thread, but there is some doubt as to the authenticity of that video:
http://www.snopes.com/photos/military/throwpuppy.asp

Despicable if true. Otherwise, a sick manipulation as a grab for mindshare - what it promotes is either cruelty itself or a dislike for the marines by association with the activity portrayed.

The quality of the film is so poor that it could easily be fake.




slaveboyforyou -> RE: Marines and a puppy (3/5/2008 11:15:28 PM)

quote:

Dog food (the cheap stuff) is .29cents a fifteen ounce can.  Beans are .59cents a 16 ounce can.  Them old fuckers may be loosing their minds(maybe it is from eating dog food) but they can still do arithmetic.
thompson


I hate to break it to you, but canned beans aren't exactly the cheapest food source.  In fact processed foods (like dog food and canned beans) are generally more costly than staples.  But then again, maybe you just really love beans. 




Zensee -> RE: Marines and a puppy (3/5/2008 11:39:55 PM)

Actually, Invictus, serial killers, as children, generally cut their teeth torturing animals to death. It's a symptom of severe mental illness, not some sort of by product of being in a war. People like him will soon be coming home to live amongst you and while you might be comfortable having a psychopath for a buddy, many sane people would not.

If he'd had to choose between the death of a person and the puppy, that would be understandable. This was an act of casual cruelty, done for the approving eye of the camera and his comrades. It was not a mercy killing. If the dog had needed to be put down, any reasonable person would have done so discretely, not in a grandstanding manner, capped by a little WTF shoulder shrug.

Are you seriously suggesting this video is a put up job? Someone made a special effects puppy and did a few hours of  CGI on their home computer? Did you look at it frame by frame. Would you like another straw to grasp at?

You can defend his actions with fantasies about rabid puppies menacing marine batalions but I'm not buying your rationalisations.


Z.




Smith117 -> RE: Marines and a puppy (3/6/2008 12:25:43 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: charmdpetKeira

quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

Nod... if that's what he did to a puppy, I shudder to think what he'd do to a human being. It's abhorrent, and war makes people do disgusting thing they probably wouldn't do otherwise.



 
It isn’t war that makes this happen; war is just the excuse being used to justify it.
 
*Hugs Christine back*
 
k



And how many wars or warzones have you served in exactly?




GreedyTop -> RE: Marines and a puppy (3/6/2008 12:43:40 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zensee

Actually, Invictus, serial killers, as children, generally cut their teeth torturing animals to death. It's a symptom of severe mental illness, not some sort of by product of being in a war. People like him will soon be coming home to live amongst you and while you might be comfortable having a psychopath for a buddy, many sane people would not.

If he'd had to choose between the death of a person and the puppy, that would be understandable. This was an act of casual cruelty, done for the approving eye of the camera and his comrades. It was not a mercy killing. If the dog had needed to be put down, any reasonable person would have done so discretely, not in a grandstanding manner, capped by a little WTF shoulder shrug.

Are you seriously suggesting this video is a put up job? Someone made a special effects puppy and did a few hours of  CGI on their home computer? Did you look at it frame by frame. Would you like another straw to grasp at?

You can defend his actions with fantasies about rabid puppies menacing marine batalions but I'm not buying your rationalisations.


Z.


yanno, I like you :)




Smith117 -> RE: Marines and a puppy (3/6/2008 1:03:27 AM)

I guess that makes it my turn, then:
There are many viewpoints you have to view this sickening video from, and you need to see them all to get a real understanding. At least one of those viewpoints you will *not* be getting unless you have actually been in a warzone. It's not something that can be explained.

This video *is* fucked up. Anyone with a soul who glances at it will more or less say the same thing (I'm one of the people crying foul over it). However:

Firstly, marines are taught from day one they are killers, terminators, the 'bad asses' of the world. They don't question orders, they don't think for themselves, they are taught to do the mission and that's it.

How's that relevant? Simple. In all that training, until only recently (so I've heard) they are *not* told how to turn off that mentality. Case in point: a marine reservist I used to work with stood toe-to-toe with me and threatened to "rip my balls off" because he couldn't take a little service rivalry joke between me and the other ex-military guy at work. All three of us cracked jokes about each other, I was the first one to bust on my own service, knowing full well what they would say. However, one comment I made caused this "part time" marine to spin around on his heels, look me in the eye and tell me he'd rip my balls off. Over WORDS. You see the marines corps doesn't tell its people that *most* problems are to be solved *without* fighting or violence because that is not what the marines need or want in its ranks. The marine corps wants killers, plain and simple. And if its people stop to think in a time of combat, they are the ones who die.

Now for the sake of my valid points, I will refrain from getting into my personal thoughts on marines, though from the above scenario, it's likely not hard to figure out.

On to point 2:
I was in a warzone for a time...not nearly as long as some today are, but 'a time.' And I pretty accurately recall something in the base 'rules' about informing authorities about stray animals as they can and do carry diseases and/or are rabid. That is a situation that you can't be forced to worry about in a combat zone because one would think your troops have enough to worry about what with the bombs under their wheels and the bullets buzzing by their heads. I don't know the particulars about the base 'edict' in reference to strays (because it's been a while and it wasn't my direct area of responsibility), but they were not just allowed to live among us. And I really don't think there are any shelters in combat zones for safe treatment of strays.

I am pretty sure, however that the base rules did NOT mention tossing a puppy off a cliff.

And so that brings me to point 3:
War fighters who've been in fucked up situations have done far worse. Hell we read the news, right? Marines who are not even *in* combat have been doing far worse (ummm R-wording japanese UM's comes to mind....I've seen more stories like *that* from the marines than I care to see in one lifetime. There's even one or two simliar tales from iraq now that I think of it).

The simple fact is fucked up combat situations can and does do fucked up things to one's mind....especially a mind that's not told how to turn that stuff off. In the early days of the Afghanistan war, several Army soldiers came back and beat or murdered their wives over simple arguments. Realizing the problem, the Army now makes them go through countless return-briefings and screenings when they get home to help them 'turn off' that combat mindset and readjust to home life. They are now *trained* to come home almost as much as they are *trained* to go to war.

Having said that, I can now go to a seemingly un-considered point 4:
I found myself wondering something when I saw this video. We hear countless tales in the news abour soldiers and marines going back over there for 3, 4, or even 5 tours. Forget seeing that conflict just once....it's almost like these guys have bunks reserved for them they've been there so many times. Likewise, we've seen tales of soldiers or marines who *didn't want* to return refusing orders to go......going AWOL.....or even getting a friend to shoot them in the leg and say it was a car-jacking so they didn't have to go back. It's *this* area that puzzles me about this video.

We all see the video and go "that's fucked up, he should be booted out," etc etc. I'm wondering if he thought the same thing? Perhaps, (and I'm just spitballing here), but perhaps in his mind, he *knew* that this was something sure to get him *something* that would prevent him from returning. Who knows how this guy's mind works or worked at that moment? I can say one thing -- if his goal *was* to not get sent back....it surely worked. And as some here have pointed out, in many places this kinda crap is still a misdemeanor...meaning it wouldn't harm his employability on the outside like say....murder would. I mean let's face it. He killed a puppy. We see *how* he did it as "totally fucked up," because it is. But he killed a puppy. He didn't torture the puppy (that we saw). He didn't do any number of worse things to the puppy that I don't even want to think about. He killed a puppy in a fucked up way. I am pretty certain the marine corps will kick his ass in some way, but I would not, however, be a bit surprised if he wasn't booted out.

Though I'm convinced and in full agreement that this is a fucked up video and I hope they hang his ass from a yard-arm (no I wasn't in the navy, but did watch "A Few Good Men"); I just find myself unconvinced about his true intentions.

And while we're ready to hang said marine from said yard-arm, I would still suggest looking a bit lighter on the video shooter/other 'star.' From his reaction, I would gather he didn't know that was about to happen and the video is too short to give us a look at what happened after. Perhaps his buddies kicked his ass for it off camera and didn't want evidence? Perhaps they gave him shit for it because of how fucked up it was. Or perhaps they joked about it. Who knows? For now, only they know.




Vendaval -> RE: Marines and a puppy (3/6/2008 1:03:44 AM)

You are right on the money, Zensee.  Serial killers start off with torturing and killing animals and work their way up the food chain to other humans.
 
Whether this video was faked for grotesque entertainment or
in fact depicts a horrible act of animal cruelty, I am completely
disgusted by what was shown.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zensee

Actually, Invictus, serial killers, as children, generally cut their teeth torturing animals to death. It's a symptom of severe mental illness, not some sort of by product of being in a war. People like him will soon be coming home to live amongst you and while you might be comfortable having a psychopath for a buddy, many sane people would not.

Z.




GreedyTop -> RE: Marines and a puppy (3/6/2008 1:15:51 AM)

that last point was a good one, Smith.  But even so, if that was the case..fullest prosecution, IMO




Smith117 -> RE: Marines and a puppy (3/6/2008 1:24:32 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: GreedyTop

that last point was a good one, Smith.  But even so, if that was the case..fullest prosecution, IMO


Well they're all good and valid. But only the last one was 'fresh.'

And I agree, fullest prosecution. But for all we know that's only a loss of one rank, a lil brig time, then back to duty. I would be seriously surprised if he were discharged for this. And even if he was, his 'separation form' will have a two-digit code on it detailing the reason. No employer in the world will have a clue what that code means. I'm on my way back *in* to service and the branch I'm joining had to find out from my first branch what my codes meant.....and they're *both* military branches.




Aheeb -> RE: Marines and a puppy (3/6/2008 1:30:20 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Smith117

quote:

ORIGINAL: GreedyTop

that last point was a good one, Smith.  But even so, if that was the case..fullest prosecution, IMO


Well they're all good and valid. But only the last one was 'fresh.'

And I agree, fullest prosecution. But for all we know that's only a loss of one rank, a lil brig time, then back to duty. I would be seriously surprised if he were discharged for this. And even if he was, his 'separation form' will have a two-digit code on it detailing the reason. No employer in the world will have a clue what that code means. I'm on my way back *in* to service and the branch I'm joining had to find out from my first branch what my codes meant.....and they're *both* military branches.


actualy if it is real he can be discharged from service and most likly it will happen. This is horrible pr and the military needs to try to keep support for the war and shit like this dosn't help.




Smith117 -> RE: Marines and a puppy (3/6/2008 1:39:50 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aheeb

actualy if it is real he can be discharged from service and most likly it will happen. This is horrible pr and the military needs to try to keep support for the war and shit like this dosn't help.


Oh I know it *can*. I'm just not going to be surprised if it doesn't.




farglebargle -> RE: Marines and a puppy (3/6/2008 3:48:43 AM)

"the military needs to try to keep support for the war"

Why? Don't they do what WE TELL THEM TO? Why should they give a shit about the PR Spin?

Maybe that's 1/2 the problem. We have people working in the Pentagon who are only concerned with keeping their job and hiring more people under them. Pournelle's Iron Law of Bureauocracy. The ONLY true purpose of Government Employees is to hire more government employees.







domahpet -> RE: Marines and a puppy (3/6/2008 7:32:55 AM)

quote:


 Maybe if the puppy's owner and mother had been killed, and the pup would have starved to death?  Would that have been more humane to let the little fucker die in the Iraqi desert heat from starvation?  None of you thought of THAT, I bet!  Maybe killing the dog was the best thing for it.  We NEVER put animals down in the USA - every one is adopted by loving, caring, people, right?  What?  Some get KILLED?  OMG!  Every shelter needs to be shut down because they kill dogs!  How do we know they do it humanely?  I bet some save money and kill the animals by "other" means - but they just don't videotape it.  Get a clue people.  Cruel things happen.
 


kinda reminds me of soldiers dealt with Indian kids and women during the Indian wars, stomping in babies heads to save bullets[:'(]
theyre animals, theyre put here for our use right? STFU!




domahpet -> RE: Marines and a puppy (3/6/2008 8:30:32 AM)

quote:


Let's say that is the case.. there are certainly more humane ways to do it than toss it off a cliff.

If I were in a war type situation (like this man) I wouldn't be wasting a bullet on a dog (how about the soldier, or yourself? out there in the desert all alone?) - to kill it "humanely"- that I might need later on an armed combatant.  The dog was dead instantly and didn't suffer - how humane is that? 
 
Everyone's reaction would have been different if the guy had been crying and said to the camera "I ... I have to kill this poor little guy because his family was killed by a suicide bomber and ... and... I can't keep him in the combat zone ... but I want to take him home to my son Bobby ... Bobby loves puppies ..."  (wipes tears off face) "... but the poor little guy is too young to fend for himself and will starve to death out here.  My Commanding officer told me that I can't waste ammunition, so I have to do it quickly and this is the only way I know how." After throwing him, he breaks down in tears, sobbing for the poor pup whose life ended all too quickly... maybe a boot to the head would have been more humane in this scenerio
 
to  you: Fuck you.  




charmdpetKeira -> RE: Marines and a puppy (3/6/2008 8:38:17 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Smith117
And how many wars or warzones have you served in exactly?



Your second post proves my point.

quote:

Firstly, marines are taught from day one they are killers, terminators, the 'bad asses' of the world. They don't question orders, they don't think for themselves, they are taught to do the mission and that's it.

 
quote:

In the early days of the Afghanistan war, several Army soldiers came back and beat or murdered their wives over simple arguments. Realizing the problem, the Army now makes them go through countless return-briefings and screenings when they get home to help them 'turn off' that combat mindset and readjust to home life. They are now *trained* to come home almost as much as they are *trained* to go to war.


My origanal statement had to do with the fact that most people are not taught they are responsable for their own actions. Sure they are told they are, but few actually get the idea. Then someone like this guy is traind, as you said, and let loose. Of course I can see why it is this way, now, it would be mighty hard to get people to volunteer to go to war if they understood that.

Alas, this was not about marines, the US, or even one helpless, little, puppy. It was about the senseless acts that some humans are willing to do, and those who would defend them.

Wars do not create these people; these people create wars, and then they train others to be just like them.

I would say let’s test Invictus754’s theory, by tossing the guy who threw the puppy, off the same cliff and see if he is correct, after all, think of how many more flies could eat then; but that just isn’t me. Besides, I don’t think he should have an easy out. Instead, if it were up to me, he would replace the dog, with himself.
 
Something tells me, that dog was going to be a herding dog.
 
k






celticlord2112 -> RE: Marines and a puppy (3/6/2008 9:00:25 AM)

quote:

Firstly, marines are taught from day one they are killers, terminators, the 'bad asses' of the world. They don't question orders, they don't think for themselves, they are taught to do the mission and that's it.


Actually, that's not it.  Beginning in boot camp, Marines are trained not only to follow orders and accomplish the mission, but what it means to conduct oneself as a United States Marine.  This includes training in the Marines' Code of Conduct, Article VI of which reads as follows:
quote:


I will never forget that I am an American, fighting for freedom, responsible for my actions, and dedicated to the principles which made my country free.  I will trust in my God and in the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.


Describing Marines as "killers" and "terminators" who "don't think for themselves" is outrageously and offensively inaccurate.




LotusSong -> RE: Marines and a puppy (3/6/2008 9:00:31 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

It's not an excuse, yet war makes people behave in ways which are naturally abhorrent in "normal" circumstances. Otherwise, nobody would have willfully participated in the concentration camps. War just sucks. We're not the nicest  creatures at the best of times, but in times of war... well, the results are to be seen on the video. Marine or not marine, people can be complete and utter pigs.



And these are our little "heros"?  




Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875