quote:

ORIGINAL: lusciouslips19

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hippiekinkster

Rule: "Quack, quack, blah blah blah, quack quack."  Okey-doke.

I just realized. My body hair being part of the Integumentary system is much needed for warmth and protection. Here I was shaving it all off and tweezing those nose hairs. I dont know whats going to become of the human race because of this? We will surely all be mutants due to these horrible practices of self mutilation!

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule

quote:

ORIGINAL: lusciouslips19
You say that congenital defects are from penile mutilation and not inbreeding????

The latter is the consequence of the former. Stop the mutilation of the penisses of their males by circumcision by various populations and after about the biblical seven generations the percentage of children born with congenital defects presumably will have dropped by a factor of five or six to normal values.
 

quote:

ORIGINAL: lusciouslips19
Please cite your scientific data that refutes science of genetics?

It does not refute the science of genetics. (Actually it is the science of evolution theory of which genetics is a part.)
The thing that is crucial is that natural selection is evoked by the slightest change in phenotype (i.e. the physical characteristics of the body), like for example one single cell in an elephant or a whale changing its characteristics. Mutilation of the penis is not a slight change in phenotype, but in evolutionary terms instead is a HUGE change in phenotype.

quote:

ORIGINAL: lusciouslips19
Edited to say the algorithms of the process of evolution are not experiencing emotions such as "unforgiveness".

The universe indeed does not have emotions, but it is unforgiving and harsh. Have you read "The cold equations" by Tom Godwin?
 

quote:

ORIGINAL: lusciouslips19
Evolution would likely make it so that men were boorn without a foreskin if this were to continue.

Foreskin is an organ, just like an eye and an ear and a lung and a finger are organs. They exists and have evolved to exist because they confer a useful advantage species that have them. Gouching out an eye from the perspective of evolution is far less damaging than mutilating the penisses of males by circumcision.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule

It so happens to be that in jewish and muslim populations there are by percentage five to six times as much congenitally defective children born than in European christian populations. That is because jewish and muslim populations mutilate by circumcision the penisses of their males. The same will happen eventually to USA christian populations that also mutilate the penisses of their male children, for the algorithms of the process of evolution are implacable and unforgiving.

quote:

ORIGINAL: charmdpetKeira

Unless of course; you are looking for worms.
 

quote:

ORIGINAL: seeksfemslave

quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol
Weak individuals often resort to join a group (or a "pack") in order to find a common identity. As you put it so well, the group defines itself because it is different from other groups...

Of course this is not true of the Jews. ?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule
I am the source, that is inherent to being a supergenius.

quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol
Seeks was trying to equate the Jewish identity to the pack mentality Licks and I had pinpointed - his comparison is wrong: now we can move on  .

quote:

ORIGINAL: seeksfemslave

quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol
Seeks was trying to equate the Jewish identity to the pack mentality Licks and I had pinpointed - his comparison is wrong: now we can move on  .

This thread is about racial/group/pack/national identitity call it what you will.
I simply pointed out that Jewish identity falls into one of those categories. I chose to do it using  a negative sardonic twist..

After all, if those who point out that racial/group differences are an illusion when we are viewed at the genetic level are correct then what is it that confers Jewish identity other than their own historical view of themselves or in other words  a social construct?
Only arskin'.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule

quote:

ORIGINAL: lusciouslips19
Again, cite your sources.

I am the source, that is inherent to being a supergenius.

quote:

ORIGINAL: lusciouslips19
Foreskin is not an organ.

Shows what you know. Then why has it a distinctive proper name, as an eye and a lung also do? Next I guess you will assert that lips - especially the red skin of them - are organs neither?

quote:

ORIGINAL: lusciouslips19
All the skin of the body is an organ.

Quite. The heart is an organ as well, but so too are the valves in the heart each a separate organ.

quote:

ORIGINAL: lusciouslips19
So do you have tatoos? Than this is a change in phenotype. How about peircings?

Yep, those are changes in phenotype that are subject to both natural and sexual and even cultural selection. But none of them will result in congenitally defective progeny.

quote:

ORIGINAL: lusciouslips19
It is not a logical and credible argument to say if circumcision stopped but marrying only amongst one group without freshening the genetics, didnt stop, then you would stop congenital defects.

And yet that is precisely what did happen to the progeny of all the European jewish populations that accepted the christian doctrines in the first century. When the mutilation of the penisses by circumcision stops eventually interbreeding will also stop, as the latter is the consequence of the former.

quote:

ORIGINAL: lusciouslips19
isnt it true that there are congenital defects in royal bloodlines in England due to the small pool of breeding that caused hemophilia?

In European royal bloodlines, yes. Royalty by definition is evil and what is evil will be cursed. In any case it has nothing to do with small breeding pools. There are plenty of examples to be found, I am sure, of long existing small breeding pools that have a low rate of congenital birth defects.

quote:

ORIGINAL: lusciouslips19
Isnt it also tru that the incidence of circumcision in England is low? How would you explain this?

As I said, royalty by definition is evil and hence accursed. Because of sociological processes they have ended up in the same situation as populations that mutilate the penisses of their males by circumcision have brought onto themselves by the process of natural selection.

quote:

ORIGINAL: lusciouslips19
Are there no congenital defects in your race or the rest of Europe?

Of course there are. I have forgotten the numbers, but at a wild guess I would say that each person of European christian descent has about twenty types of congenital birth defects in their genome. However, the frequency of these mutations are far higher in populations such as muslims and jews that mutilate the penisses of their males. (They are also nearly as high it seems in populations that reproduce indiscriminately.)

quote:

ORIGINAL: lusciouslips19
You make no sense.

Then I must be right by definition. Supergenius can only be recognized by supergenius, not by ordinary people.

quote:

ORIGINAL: FullCircle

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule
I am the source, that is inherent to being a supergenius.

I can tell this discussion is going to go on for a while.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule

quote:

ORIGINAL: lusciouslips19
You say that congenital defects are from penile mutilation and not inbreeding????

The latter is the consequence of the former. Stop the mutilation of the penisses of their males by circumcision by various populations and after about the biblical seven generations the percentage of children born with congenital defects presumably will have dropped by a factor of five or six to normal values.