littlebitxxx
Posts: 732
Status: offline
|
I don't know if it's because Sunday is my brain's day off, or lack of caffeine...but I still don't get why anyone would deliberately set someone up for failure. I've re-read your posts and, so far, Steel's is the only one that made sense. His was an intentional method of getting her to realize that, even though she had technically "failed" at her task, she still did more than she thought she could. It was a drastic way to learn, mind you, but maybe that's what she needed. IMO, setting someone to a task you know they will fail at with the result being punishment is psychologically cruel and the actions of a control freak. If it is done with the intention of showing them "their place", again there are other ways I think more beneficial. If it is done as a result of needing a drastic method of showing her she really can't do everything like Superman, and to just relax a little and enjoy life, well..that's a little more tolerable. Please explain, I would really like to understand this. It sort of falls part and parcel in with punishment vs discipline, and even a bit of the humiliation aspect. Things which I'm trying to get my head around. Thanks for any help.
_____________________________
There is no such thing as can't unless it is followed by yet It is the meaningless little acts that become meaningful in the doing. The people that mind don't matter and the people that matter don't mind.
|