Wolfie648
Posts: 600
Joined: 9/14/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
quote: Okay concerning Fire Play would anyone consider a Master laying his ciggarette on his slave's skin fire play?????? Can anyone answer that for me????? If so please email me the answer here wantinaSireorSir No, you look that one up under "Abuse". It's not abuse if a slave has consented to be a slave. The black (negro?) slaves in the US (worldwide of whatever race) would have been laughed at (minimum) if they complained to anyone, legal or not, about what their master did to them. The difference between a lifestyle slave and the black slaves is that a lifestyle slave has given informed (hopefully) consent. What happened to the black slaves was plain wrong. Now I'll be the first to admit that this is my interpretation but most dictionary's agree with me (not that they intended to ;-). www.dictionary.com doesn't quite hit it but "The new Lexicon Webster's Dictionary of the English Language 1988 Edition" has this to say: slave: (sleiv) 1. n. a person who is the property of, and completely subject to, another // a person victimized by another --posters note (oooh that sounds so sexy)-- // (etc. not relevant. property: (properti:) ... n. a thing or things owned // real estate // (etc. not relevant) Guess what I can do with real estate I own. I can ignore and let it grow over, I can dig holes in it, I can plant a rose garden, I could sell it. I could do nuclear tests in it (ok I don't have the resources for it but it was fun to say), I could donate it to charity, I could painstakingly tend every inch of it. I may or may not do any of those things, but it is my choice. A submissive would certainly have the right to safeword before it touched the skin (after as well I suppose, but at that point why bother safewording? ;-) Legally, these days, it's abuse regardless of what anyone has agreed to or not. D (owner of j)
|