Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: One or Two Iraq Questions


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity >> RE: One or Two Iraq Questions Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: One or Two Iraq Questions - 10/17/2005 4:33:24 PM   
domtimothy46176


Posts: 670
Joined: 12/25/2004
From: Dayton, Ohio area
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster

Hey, John, stop making this so complicated. It's simple: they bomb us, we nuke them.

Right?


I don't have any particuar desire to escalate what I percieve to be a strictly philosophical discussion but I will attest that I have no qualms about supporting just such a position and I think I would sleep just fine at night after pushing the button myself.
After 9/11, when the case was presented that the hijackers were mostly Saudis, probably trained in Syria and Afghanistan, I supported the obliteration of those countries. Old Testament destruction, salt the earth, poison the wells, leave no living thing behind, that's precisely my prescription for ensuring the sanctity of the US.
I don't really give a rat's ass if we ever see peace in the Middle East and I'm not particularly concerned with the rising cost of crude oil. As Americans, we innovate when the need arises and we'll figure something out if the ready oil supply dries up because the largest reserves are buried under radioactive glass three feet thick.
What does concern me is the future safety of my children and, to that end, I would happily slaughter little muslim babes as they lay sleeping at their mothers' teats. Charity begins at home and if they want to play, let them, every man woman and child, ante up or sit the fuck down.
The common man may have little or nothing to do with terrorism but he can demand government reform and get it, if he has reason enough. There's a good reason Egypt decided to leave Israel alone and it isn't because the Egyptian government decided to be nice. It's because the common Egyptian didn't want to get his ass shot up going over the border.
For much too long, in my less than humble opinion, the US government has bowed before the weight of world opinion and we're living the consequences of being seen as impotent sloths that can't be bothered to swat at the mosquitos munching on our collective dicks.
If we fail to take decisive action, we invite folks like Bin Laden to kick us in the nuts.
Timothy

(in reply to Lordandmaster)
Profile   Post #: 101
RE: One or Two Iraq Questions - 10/17/2005 5:02:02 PM   
JohnWarren


Posts: 3807
Joined: 3/18/2005
From: Delray Beach, FL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: domtimothy46176

I would happily slaughter little muslim babes as they lay sleeping at their mothers' teats.


Well, not much I can say to that except I'm glad you aren't running the country.


_____________________________

www.lovingdominant.org

(in reply to domtimothy46176)
Profile   Post #: 102
RE: One or Two Iraq Questions - 10/17/2005 6:36:25 PM   
Lordandmaster


Posts: 10943
Joined: 6/22/2004
Status: offline
Well, the first problem with "obliterating" countries is that it's not going to do a thing to end terrorism. If anything, it's only going to breed more terrorists. Terrorists know that, and they giggle every time they read opinions like this. We have all this advanced weaponry, all these nuclear warheads, and the terrorists know very well that they don't serve us very well in this conflict. Americans are frustrated because they're used to having potential enemies back down because we can threaten them with nuclear weapons, and that strategy doesn't work now. Policework stops terrorists--not nuclear bombs.

The second problem with "obliterating" countries is that it turns us into exactly what we are condemning.

(in reply to domtimothy46176)
Profile   Post #: 103
RE: One or Two Iraq Questions - 10/17/2005 10:00:45 PM   
DesertRat


Posts: 2774
Joined: 11/29/2004
From: NM/USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: domtimothy46176

Old Testament destruction, salt the earth, poison the wells, leave no living thing behind, that's precisely my prescription for ensuring the sanctity of the US.



Sheesh...I was worried about the Bush policies. Things could be worse, I guess. Strangely reassuring to reflect on the fact that, even in today's knee-jerk jingoistic climate, such views are well out of the mainstream.

Bob

(in reply to domtimothy46176)
Profile   Post #: 104
RE: One or Two Iraq Questions - 10/18/2005 6:52:08 AM   
Mercnbeth


Posts: 11766
Status: offline
quote:

even in today's knee-jerk jingoistic climate, such views are well out of the mainstream.


Bob,

You think so? You should have been in NYC on 9/12. It will be interesting to see the stream's flow after the next attack.

It would be interesting, in lieu of nay saying to actually see an idea. I see an idea about calling it a "police action" like it was in Korea, versus a war. A lot of "cops" died there too. I suggested a plan for unilateral withdrawn that did not include any aggressive attack or even a military presence. The negative comments that followed were in reaction to a subsequent attack. Is your solution continued retreat within our borders with no retaliation? Or is the plan just to bitch about the newly implemented, Koran influenced set of laws?

(in reply to DesertRat)
Profile   Post #: 105
RE: One or Two Iraq Questions - 10/18/2005 7:19:37 AM   
Lordandmaster


Posts: 10943
Joined: 6/22/2004
Status: offline
I thought you were from California. Some of us really are New Yorkers. In fact, I think it's interesting that more non-New Yorkers are willing to nuke other countries than New Yorkers are.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth

You should have been in NYC on 9/12.


(in reply to Mercnbeth)
Profile   Post #: 106
RE: One or Two Iraq Questions - 10/18/2005 7:22:19 AM   
Mercnbeth


Posts: 11766
Status: offline
quote:

I thought you were from California.


I live in CA I'm from NYC. In fact, my office was on the 97th floor of the south tower. I wasn't there because my partner went in early to take care of some paperwork and I was going to pick him up at 11:30 for a golf outing on a great looking day. I never got there and he never got out.

Hope that clears up the residence question.

(in reply to Lordandmaster)
Profile   Post #: 107
RE: One or Two Iraq Questions - 10/18/2005 7:23:29 AM   
Lordandmaster


Posts: 10943
Joined: 6/22/2004
Status: offline
That sucks. I'm sorry this happened to you.

Edited to add: Of course, I still don't think it's OK to nuke other nations, but we've gone over that already.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth

In fact, my office was on the 97th floor of the south tower. I wasn't there because my partner went in early to take care of some paperwork and I was going to pick him up at 11:30 for a golf outing on a great looking day. I never got there and he never got out.



< Message edited by Lordandmaster -- 10/18/2005 7:27:52 AM >

(in reply to Mercnbeth)
Profile   Post #: 108
RE: One or Two Iraq Questions - 10/18/2005 7:58:00 AM   
JohnWarren


Posts: 3807
Joined: 3/18/2005
From: Delray Beach, FL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth

You should have been in NYC on 9/12.



quote:

ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster

I thought you were from California. Some of us really are New Yorkers. In fact, I think it's interesting that more non-New Yorkers are willing to nuke other countries than New Yorkers are.


A friend of mine who lives on Broadway near Union Square told me about a rally in the square shortly after 9/11 that people held to show their support for the local Islamic community. It seems they could tell the difference between nutjobs and ordinary working people who had different religious beliefs.




_____________________________

www.lovingdominant.org

(in reply to Lordandmaster)
Profile   Post #: 109
RE: One or Two Iraq Questions - 10/18/2005 9:20:12 AM   
DesertRat


Posts: 2774
Joined: 11/29/2004
From: NM/USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth

Is your solution continued retreat within our borders with no retaliation? Or is the plan just to bitch about the newly implemented, Koran influenced set of laws?



I don't have a solution, since I am not sure just what the problem is. I am also wondering about those "Koran influenced" laws. Our Republican congress passed laws based on Islamic beliefs? Hard to imagine.

I am a bit of an idealist, and that surely influences my views. I might be wrong but it seems to me that when I was young, the US showed its strength by extending an open hand and a smiling face to the world (overall, I mean; like any nation, we have always had our moments of cynicism). Now, it seems we extend a smirk and an iron fist and in doing so, we show our weakness and our fear.

My dad was not tall, but he was a physically imposing man, strong and tough. Inside, he was weak and scared and tried to compensate for that by being a violent bully. The people around him feared for their safety but they did not like him. They did not respect or admire him, and some wished him dead. His attempts to project strength accentuated his weakness and, in effect, weakened him further. The US is starting to remind me of my dad. And when I say "the US", I'm not talking about the buildings, the mountains, or the trees. I am talking about the people. Not all of them, obviously, but enough to make me wonder just where we, as a nation are headed.

I think the terrorists are winning, in the sense that they now get to sit back and watch us tear into each other. If they are smart they will attack again. Not for the purpose of killing Americans, but for the purpose of making us even more polarized. We need leadership that can counteract such manipulations. Moderation is not cowardice and it is not appeasement; it is pragmatic. It allows a nation to proceed on the basis of a consensus. It allows for aggression tempered by reason. What we have now is a lack of leadership.

Bob



(in reply to Mercnbeth)
Profile   Post #: 110
RE: One or Two Iraq Questions - 10/18/2005 5:47:22 PM   
domtimothy46176


Posts: 670
Joined: 12/25/2004
From: Dayton, Ohio area
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster

Well, the first problem with "obliterating" countries is that it's not going to do a thing to end terrorism. If anything, it's only going to breed more terrorists. Terrorists know that, and they giggle every time they read opinions like this. We have all this advanced weaponry, all these nuclear warheads, and the terrorists know very well that they don't serve us very well in this conflict. Americans are frustrated because they're used to having potential enemies back down because we can threaten them with nuclear weapons, and that strategy doesn't work now. Policework stops terrorists--not nuclear bombs.

The second problem with "obliterating" countries is that it turns us into exactly what we are condemning.


You and I are in direct disagreement. My personal observations of group dynamics leads me to believe that a group threatened with joint consequences for the actions of an individual will seek to become self-policing. I can site examples all day long but I'm certain every single poster has seen this in action for himself.
If the threat of annihilation doesn't persuade the citizens of a nation to police themselves, I promise that the obliteration of the populace will forstall any further aggression. Dead people don't fight back, they don't teach others to hate and they don't have children seeking vengeance.
You're entitled to your opinion, but I think if we turned a few countries into glowing glass plains, the rest of them might decide that caution is, afterall, the better part of valor and increase their efforts at ensuring they don't give us a reason to look their way next. Religious fanatics have a lot of leeway in islamic societies, in general, because the cost of crossing them can be very high. If we make the cost of crossing us even higher, we remove the majority of the jihadists' leverage over govermental policies in places like Sudan, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Iraq, Libya, Jordan, Pakistan, et al.
I'm certain that John isn't the only one that's happy I'm not running the show. Hell, I don't want the job. I think Bush has handicapped himself by being too willing to compromise but that's also his trademark. Those who think his leadership is lacking are preaching to the choir. OTOH, no one seems to have a better idea. Any other person sitting in the Oval Office would be faced with the same cost/benefit analyses and would be stuck with the same difficult decisions, knowing full well that no matter which course is chosen, some will be up in arms.
If I was stuck running the country, the biggest difference would be my lack of concern for public opinion. I would just do the damned job and go home after my four years. Ya don't like it, you try to do a better job of it.
Bitching is easy, whether it's about what we're doing, what we will do or what we have done. Making the call and being held responsible for it is a whole other ball game. Signing up for a job where you know you'll be reviled by almost half the country takes bigger balls than most folks have.
I can accept what we're doing, because I accept that this is how the country works. We vote and we reap the benefits. Every single one of us needs to suck it up and express our beliefs with our votes. In the meantime, we need to support the men and women in uniform who are doing their jobs by working to get the job done so they can come home. Each of us has ideas about what needs to be done to get them home but those ideas need to be expressed where they make a difference. Whatever you think needs to happen, call your senators and representative and give them an earful.
Bitching about how our country is wrong for what we're doing and how our soldiers are dying in vain weakens our troops and strengthen the folks trying to kill them. Morale is important when your ass is on the line and bad morale makes for soldiers who aren't at their best at keeping themselves and their buddies alive. The troops need to know that we're in their corner that we want them to get 'er done and come home. They need to know that we recognize them as the heroes they are.
That's a lil more than my $.02 worth but you can keep the change
Timothy

(in reply to Lordandmaster)
Profile   Post #: 111
RE: One or Two Iraq Questions - 10/18/2005 6:13:41 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Now in a very strict context, tim, I am your boy. We've been over this ground before on other threads. I am all for saying to afganistan. Deliver me Osama Bin Lauden. You have till 4 oclock. If at that time he is not here, I will bomb your fucking country level. Then I will wake up in the morning and being the peaceable guy I am, I will say, deliver me Osama Bin Lauden by 4 oclock or I will start digging a hole where your country was with nukes. (As the bible says, you will become a taunt and a hiss and a wastland) ........But; Iraq is a wholly different proposition. This is what is wrong with the discussions in my mind. There is no linkage with anyone who has done damage to me in Iraq, and I had hoped we had settled the YHWH and Allah thing years ago, sometime around Bill the Conquerer (Magna Charta) even them fuckers were sick of fighting confilicts that were not germain. So we stand here killing insurgents.....70 today by some accounts...maybe if they would have been in Norway in WW2 we would have called them resistance or freedom fighters. What the hell do we have any buisness in that country for WMD? Fuck it, we got WMD. And when I was in we could pick out a conversation at 128,000 feet and identify who was saying what to who.

Don't tell me that a couple million bucks can't get the bastard here. Again, I had this friend Tom from Verplanck, NY and a highschool teacher by the name of Dave Jensen and the list just goes on and fucking on.......and it better be worth it and not posturing. So. here is how indochina went....holy fuck, it is like a domino, pretty soon you got communists running all over the western hemisphere......
so we can stand a little communism here.

The French Indo-chinans (VietNam for you younger folk) are commies...nobody died........AFTER!!!!!!!!!!!!!
We have to re-visit KOREA.........
KHADDAFI is your freind.
CUBA can't sell you cigars......what a hateful country that is.

If you are gonna kill people oh, Saddam killed a bunch....
then you send ours out to die.........

The question is what has been gained and what has been lost.

It bettter be for more than God fucking said. Cause not everybody believes in YHWH or the two-party system as the end of the joke.

I will even go so far as to say that is weak-minded.




_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to domtimothy46176)
Profile   Post #: 112
RE: One or Two Iraq Questions - 10/18/2005 11:00:07 PM   
Lordandmaster


Posts: 10943
Joined: 6/22/2004
Status: offline
No disagreement there.

quote:

ORIGINAL: domtimothy46176

You and I are in direct disagreement.


(in reply to domtimothy46176)
Profile   Post #: 113
RE: One or Two Iraq Questions - 10/19/2005 5:28:02 AM   
pantera


Posts: 210
Joined: 1/7/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JohnWarren



Remember the picture of the naked girl running from the napalm?



I saw an interview with this woman (the naked girl running) and what she had to say was very different to what many people that use her example say.


(in reply to JohnWarren)
Profile   Post #: 114
RE: One or Two Iraq Questions - 10/19/2005 5:34:04 AM   
pantera


Posts: 210
Joined: 1/7/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Marx

And i will continue to defend the Cubans who stayed, even though i have zero illusions about the country as any kind of Utopia!


the Cubans that stayed where? In Cuba? - and you are right...to think about the Cuba of today as any kind of Utopia would have to be an illusion-

(in reply to Marx)
Profile   Post #: 115
RE: One or Two Iraq Questions - 10/19/2005 6:22:42 AM   
frenchpet


Posts: 587
Joined: 8/19/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: pantera


quote:

ORIGINAL: JohnWarren



Remember the picture of the naked girl running from the napalm?



I saw an interview with this woman (the naked girl running) and what she had to say was very different to what many people that use her example say.



What are you refering to ? The fact that she was angry against the vietnamese government that was trying to use her for its propaganda ?

Here is something she said. It's copyrighted by UNESCO Press (2002), but I doubt they would demand her message to be removed from the board.
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kim Phuc

quote:

ORIGINAL:UNESCO PRESS
You've been a UNESCO Goodwill Ambassador since 1997. What is your message?

I want my experience to serve a purpose: I was burned because of war. Today, I want to encourage people to love and help one another. We need to learn how to become more tolerant, how to look at the individual, to listen, to come out of ourselves, to help others instead of letting ourselves get carried away by anger and hatred, which give rise to revenge and violence in the world and don't help anybody.

War causes nothing but suffering. That's why I show the little girl in the picture. Because she tells my story and the consequences that war has had on my life. No father or mother in the world wants what happened in that picture to happen again. I would like to transmit what I have learned to value: I experienced war; I know the value of peace.

I have lived with my pain; I know the value of love when you want to heal. I have lived with hatred, and now I know the power of forgiveness. Today, I am alive, I live without hatred, without the spirit of revenge, and I can tell all those who caused my suffering: I forgive you. That is the only way to save peace, to speak of tolerance and non-violence.

quote:

ORIGINAL:UNESCO PRESS
Those are also the ideals that UNESCO defends. But it's not easy to forgive, especially in the context of a war.


You always have a choice. I have chosen reconciliation, and my life has changed. I have stopped being a victim. So I say, look, this is how I found peace. This is my experience. I pulled through. And today my present is your future, if you want it to be.

Children are usually the ones who receive my message most easily. That's why I visit schools as often as possible. I tell them, our future is in your hands, you are responsible for peace. Act!

That's exactly the messsage I've always heard when her example was used.

In case you (mods) decide to remove this quote, here is a URL to read the complete interview :
http://www.bruderhof.com/articles/kim-phuc-2.htm

(in reply to pantera)
Profile   Post #: 116
RE: One or Two Iraq Questions - 10/19/2005 6:37:35 AM   
JohnWarren


Posts: 3807
Joined: 3/18/2005
From: Delray Beach, FL
Status: offline
This is just about the message I think should be getting out: the need to get along and avoid the suffering of war.

_____________________________

www.lovingdominant.org

(in reply to frenchpet)
Profile   Post #: 117
RE: One or Two Iraq Questions - 10/20/2005 5:06:46 AM   
pantera


Posts: 210
Joined: 1/7/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JohnWarren

This is just about the message I think should be getting out: the need to get along and avoid the suffering of war.



that would be ideal ...but as long as there are people out there that want to kill me...and you...and my daughter...is ou duty to confront them....to avoid the suffering of not being free and live in terror.


Who said the following was one of the questions when I did my citizenship test:


Is life so dear or peace so sweet as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?

"Forbid it, Almighty God -- I know not what course others may take; but as for me -- give me liberty or give me death!"



(in reply to JohnWarren)
Profile   Post #: 118
RE: One or Two Iraq Questions - 10/21/2005 6:27:34 AM   
plantlady64


Posts: 755
Joined: 5/19/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: FangsNfeet

If you are against the war and think Iraq should have never been invaded, then do you agree that Saddam should be back in power? I'm curious how many anti War/Bush people would like to see Saddam back in power of Iraq. After all, if you're anti war, then dosen't make you a Saddam back in power supporter?

Hello There,
I'm thinking you posted this message as a joke. At least I'm hoping so.
I am absolutely against trying to solve anything with violence. I personally feel this war is a personal vendetta and ego trip for Bush. I'm actually ashamed to have him as our Nations leader. What a chest-thumping cowboy he is. He disgusts me not only due to the war, but also on many fronts. I think he started the war against the advice of the UN due to Sadam's assassination attempt on his Dad Mr. Bush I do respect.
I disagree this means I think Sadam should be restored to power, but I feel a precise assignation would have been the proper way to go, not by putting our American's in the war in the position they now live through daily. Two wrongs don't make it right in my book. The calloused way he talks about our loss of lives in the military has no more compassion than someone playing chess would have sacrificing a pawn.
I know my opinion is not popular with many patriotic people, but I am a very involved patriot. I just don't feel like idiotic people like Bush should be trusted with a dog’s life let alone a country and all who live under his authority. HE"S SUCH A LOSER!!!! I wish I could be a fly on the wall on his judgment day.
It's a strange concept you feel the way you do to me. I know lots of people agree with you. Proof would be one of the Dixie Chicks in Texas at a concert of theirs said she was ashamed of the President. Everyone went nuts and almost blackballed and boycotted her. I on the other hand knew what she meant as I am in full agreement that I'm ashamed of the leader of our country too.

I still feel
WAR IS NOT THE ANSWER, IT ONLY ADDS TO THE PROBLEM!!!!!!

Sincerely,

sub suzanne

(in reply to FangsNfeet)
Profile   Post #: 119
RE: One or Two Iraq Questions - 10/21/2005 7:05:42 AM   
plantlady64


Posts: 755
Joined: 5/19/2005
Status: offline
quote:

As a lieutenant, how did you respond to people saying that your mission was to "kill babies". The poster child of the Vietnam anti-war movement, Ms. Fonda called the military leaders "war criminals". Currently even she appreciated the comfort she gave the enemy and the pain she inflicted upon the soldiers. In 1988 in an interview with Barbara Walters on 20/20, Jane Fonda talked about her Vietnam visit and issued what some feel was an apology but which her critics say was not enough.
Fonda said, "I would like to say something, not just to Vietnam veterans in New England, but to men who were in Vietnam, who I hurt, or whose pain I caused to deepen because of the things that I said or did. I was trying to help end the killing and the war, but there were times when I was thoughtless and careless about it and I'm...very sorry that I hurt them. And I want to apologize to them and their families."

Jane Fonda is another one who shouldn't own a dog. I again wish I could be present on her judgement day. She had an opportunity to go to an enemy camp and visit prisoners of war. As she went doen the row shaking hands with the GI's they were slipping her tiny peices of paper with their social security numbers on it in hopes of letting their family know they were alive. Once her visit ended she gave all the papers to the warden of the jail. She deserves to be tortured, maimed, kept hidden from her loved ones for the rest of her days in my opinion behind that one.
She's a big loser in my book too.
Sincerely,
sub suzanne

(in reply to Mercnbeth)
Profile   Post #: 120
Page:   <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity >> RE: One or Two Iraq Questions Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.063