ChallengeMe
Posts: 25
Joined: 11/30/2005 Status: offline
|
Saddam was like Tito. A violent dictator who managed to keep two genocidally opposed people from starting a civil war. When Tito died and left no immediate successor, yugoslavia became a horrible bloodbath of genicide and civil war. Was tito an evil man? yes. did his brutal reign over yugoslavia help the country? yes! they even made a car and sold it over here! Saddam was so horrid BECAUSE HE HAD TO BE IN ORDER TO KEEP THE SHI'ITES FROM KILLING OFF ALL THE SUNNIS AND THE KURDS TO BOOT. lOOK AT IRAN. If he'd been kid-gloves with everyone, he would have gotten removed rom power and iraq would resemble iran...which is a nasty theocracy. This is why Saddam was helped by America to stay in power. Sunnis are, in general, less violent, less religious-wacko and less antiamerican than shi'ites....hell, isn't there a pic of rumsfeld shaking saddam's hand? African dictators who are equally cruel often result from the same problem: tribes that want to murder each other. Rwanda is one such example. It may have been better to leave saddam in power instead of invading iraq in the whole kuwait debacle. Woulda cost less, and gotten us lots more oil. Kuwait, in fact, was not an innocent victim. Hidden from the American people by the media is the underlying cause for gulf war 1. Kuwait was stealing iraqi oil. they were "slant drilling" which is about the same as if mexico drilled under texas and pumped oil from under a texan oilfield. You think the US wouldn't resort to some military tactic if mexico did not stop pumping texas crude when asked "politely"? HA! so in fact, gulf war 1 was indeed an oil war, although not quite for the reasons your run-of-the-mill liberal may tell you. It just so happened that kuwait supplied us with oil. Kuwait was stealing iraq's oil, and iraq attacked kuwait for it. So....roundabout...woudl I like to see saddam back in power? No. I would not have minded him in power before (no skin off my back), but now things have gone too far and his return to power WOULD spark a civil war. He is now useless as a dictator. Bush was stupid to invade iraq before afganistan was finished. Starting one war...before the one you're already in is over...is damned-near always going to lead into a quagmire somewhere. Before 1990, saddam was our friend. there was no good reason other than oil to change that. Ah, the genocides....much has been made of saddam's treatment of the indigeous people of the north, the kurds. As an american, I shut my mouth when it comes to criticizing the treatment of native peoples of a land by the non-native ruling government. We actually gave smallpox-infested blankets to women and children. Wait...isn't that a use of a WMD by our military against a village of our own people? Hmmm.... gives ya thought. Whatever. Politics is war and war is politics. It was a bad move, and we should admit that it was a bad move, and continue the mission....because if you're going to do something wrong, at least do it the right way!
|