RE: Taming of Shrews (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


mnottertail -> RE: Taming of Shrews (3/25/2008 2:14:03 PM)

this was the first harlequin romance, and it is the basic alchemy for the recipe.

Woman meets man.
Woman, upon first and shallow impressions, conflicts with and is somewhat despising of him.
Due to mans strength and  consistancy as well as slowly cornering her by withdrawing choices, not by anything he did, but by her seeing a different reflective angle, and against her apparent strenght of will and feeling,   she turns out to be a whore and wants to suck his dick.

Love is the same since we were ameobas.

MasterInterpreter




softness -> RE: Taming of Shrews (3/25/2008 2:17:26 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

You will be so empowered if a man, under pretexts of marriage, takes your finacial security, starves you, deprives you of sleep, rapes you, denies you clothing, makes you lie to stroke his vanity, decieve people, and destroys your relationships with others. 



Wow... Dark Victory ...that sounds hot ..can we get U/us that some of that please Sir???..pretty please?

Seriously Aylee... I dont want empowerment ..I want enslavement... that is why I am on collarme seeking Total Power Exchange..that is why I am interviewing with a Man to become His owned property. I want to hand Him on a plate every hard won right  and responsibility. I want Him to have total control of my finances, of my legal decisions, even of my medical decisions. I want Him to have EVERYTHING. My point is that what He will take total power of... is a wiity, strong woman, I hope He will allow me to continue being that woman. All I can do is hope because I will have given Him all of the power.




Aylee -> RE: Taming of Shrews (3/25/2008 2:26:41 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: softness

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

You will be so empowered if a man, under pretexts of marriage, takes your finacial security, starves you, deprives you of sleep, rapes you, denies you clothing, makes you lie to stroke his vanity, decieve people, and destroys your relationships with others. 



Wow... Dark Victory ...that sounds hot ..can we get U/us that some of that please Sir???..pretty please?

Seriously Aylee... I dont want empowerment ..I want enslavement... that is why I am on collarme seeking Total Power Exchange..that is why I am interviewing with a Man to become His owned property. I want to hand Him on a plate every hard won right  and responsibility. I want Him to have total control of my finances, of my legal decisions, even of my medical decisions. I want Him to have EVERYTHING. My point is that what He will take total power of... is a wiity, strong woman, I hope He will allow me to continue being that woman. All I can do is hope because I will have given Him all of the power.


Yours would be consentual.  Hers was not.  That is the point that I am trying to make. 

You would choose for all of those things to happen.  You would not need domestic terrorism to be forced into it. 

I realize that I am blowing the fairy dust off of the romance that you see in the play.  But P. is not an ethical character.  I am sure that the male that you want to give your submission/surrender/self to, you want to be ethical. 

I do highly reccommend the movie version with Elizabeth Taylor.  That is probably my favorite version.  In that one, you definatly get the idea that she knows what is going on and is playing along, being a willing participant.   




DarkVictory -> RE: Taming of Shrews (3/25/2008 2:39:47 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

quote:

ORIGINAL: softness

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

You will be so empowered if a man, under pretexts of marriage, takes your finacial security, starves you, deprives you of sleep, rapes you, denies you clothing, makes you lie to stroke his vanity, decieve people, and destroys your relationships with others. 



Wow... Dark Victory ...that sounds hot ..can we get U/us that some of that please Sir???..pretty please?

Seriously Aylee... I dont want empowerment ..I want enslavement... that is why I am on collarme seeking Total Power Exchange..that is why I am interviewing with a Man to become His owned property. I want to hand Him on a plate every hard won right  and responsibility. I want Him to have total control of my finances, of my legal decisions, even of my medical decisions. I want Him to have EVERYTHING. My point is that what He will take total power of... is a wiity, strong woman, I hope He will allow me to continue being that woman. All I can do is hope because I will have given Him all of the power.


Yours would be consentual.  Hers was not.  That is the point that I am trying to make. 

You would choose for all of those things to happen.  You would not need domestic terrorism to be forced into it. 

I realize that I am blowing the fairy dust off of the romance that you see in the play.  But P. is not an ethical character.  I am sure that the male that you want to give your submission/surrender/self to, you want to be ethical. 

I do highly reccommend the movie version with Elizabeth Taylor.  That is probably my favorite version.  In that one, you definatly get the idea that she knows what is going on and is playing along, being a willing participant.   


It's a PLAY, that you are now subjecting to your modern, politically correct interpretation of how things between men and women should be.  And of course, the character of P is bad, in this modern, guaranteed to be correct forever amen, interpretation.  The smug superiority of not needing to read any deeper than the surface level must sit quite well, and leave one feeling oh so right.  Of course, I assume that you subject all literature to this same reinterpretation?  How ever do you get through a novel without flinging it against the wall and howling about the demeaning and oppressive patriarchy? 

The history, the fantasy, and the reality of slavery, of submission, of forced violation are all grist for the mill of the libido.  In your response I smell the scent of what Bradbury warned us of.  One's enjoyment, one's humor, one's love of the moment must seemingly all be hewed fast to the notion of the moment.  I pity this place you stand in.  It is bereft of the kind of beauty that is possible when one surrenders to passion.






Stephann -> RE: Taming of Shrews (3/25/2008 2:42:19 PM)

It was a play written in a time where 'equality of gender' was not yet a concept understood.  You could just as quickly rail against the inequities of slavery or religious persecution at the time.  Hell, why not get ruffled feathers over doctors using leeches.

It's the human instincts which motivate the play that have literary value, that there are elements of those characters in all of us today.  Pointing to a four hundred year old text, and decrying it's value, because it doesn't hold water under your morality today is like complaining that Bach is boring, because there aren't any electric guitars.  It helps to appreciate the value of a work, in the historical context it derives from.

Stephan




charlotteS -> RE: Taming of Shrews (3/25/2008 2:45:19 PM)

Softness, what an excellent post and I think I am going to go home and start reading the play again.

I can't speak for Shakespeare's intentions but I can say that for my own part men who can't make me theirs dont' interest me.  In Kate I see a woman who was independent and willful until she met her match.  Perhaps she truly was a submissive and was such a brat before because she was frustrated with all the weak men around her.  It must be frustrating for a woman in that time to socially have no power over men and even if she finds herself to be smarter and stronger than them she must still remain powerless.  I liken it to when I push Master, pulling on my chains a bit.  I dont' do it because I want him to give in to me, I do it because I want to feel his strength and if I was with someone that didn't pull back I would find myself, bored, cranky and probably just as shrewish as Kate. 

I'm going to have to re read it to find evidence for this theory and I'm pretty sure Shakespeare wasn't writing a D/s play on purpose.  However, neither do I believe he was writing a patriarchal message.  He has written too many amazing woman roles for me to believe that he was condemning strong women.  Why couldn't he have been making fun of the women who simply acquiesce to any man that comes along and all the men that couldn't stand up to Kate's bite? 

charlotte






softness -> RE: Taming of Shrews (3/25/2008 2:48:56 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee
I realize that I am blowing the fairy dust off of the romance that you see in the play.  But P. is not an ethical character.  I am sure that the male that you want to give your submission/surrender/self to, you want to be ethical. 

I do highly reccommend the movie version with Elizabeth Taylor.  That is probably my favorite version.  In that one, you definatly get the idea that she knows what is going on and is playing along, being a willing participant.   


there is no fairy dust Aylee.. its a brutal play ..BRUTAL..mostof its brutality comes fromthe fact that Petruchio is able to take this woman apart and rebuild her.

Read carefully the second act .. and you will actually find several instances where she is given an opportunity to back out of the marriage .. but her PRIDE stops her. Ifwe are going to go around pretending its real.. then there is your consensuality right there.. her PRIDE makes her do it ..not her father

I dont need to watch a production to get the play ... I get it by reading the damn thing. I  dont think she is playing along in that production of the play ...

but its a play ... its can be manipulated however it wants.. and read however it needs to be read ... Marxists held up King Lear as evidence of disquiet and support for Marxism n the 16th century ... Marxism .. they had barely gotten a middle class .. let alone one which was  oppressive to the masses!




fairerthanshe -> RE: Taming of Shrews (3/25/2008 3:16:23 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Stephann

It's the human instincts which motivate the play that have literary value, that there are elements of those characters in all of us today.  Pointing to a four hundred year old text, and decrying it's value, because it doesn't hold water under your morality today is like complaining that Bach is boring, because there aren't any electric guitars.  It helps to appreciate the value of a work, in the historical context it derives from.

Stephan



Greetings Master,

What is this context of which you speak???  Who ever heard of contextualizing something - why that would mean that not everything was about me???  (sorry, I'll stop now...)

Seriously though, much of what Shakespeare wrote has applicability in a contemporary sense.  Taking the central message of his works and retelling them along modern lines has been done several times.

I personally think Katherine's character is highly valuable as a touchstone to girls who desire enslavement and suggest it be read by same.  One of the derivations of my nickname is from a line in Taming of the Shrew.  (Though it is also the name of my favorite novel)

well wishes ~ fairer than she




bipolarber -> RE: Taming of Shrews (3/25/2008 3:20:32 PM)

I guess I have a different take on the play, after having been in several mountings of it over the decades. (No, I never played Pete. I was usually the comic old man convinced that his life was in danger, and hoodwinked into posing as the suitors well heeled father.) Anyway, I always saw this as a story about a woman who was alway in competition for love with her little (more beautiful by some opinions) sister. So, she turns bitchy. I've always thought that Pete actually sees this for what it is, and sets about reversing that behavior both by wearing her down, and making absolutely sure that she knows that everything he does is because he loves her absolutely.

Ultimately, "Wild Bill" Shakespeare cops out and makes it all a dream. (So the producers of "Dallas" weren't the first to use that lame-o device.) But, even as a dream to take the edge of the story off, it still has a lot to say about love, and the way men and women relate to one another. Bill was a pretty kinky guy... Look at the "make me your dog" speech in "Midsummer Night's" or the rimming allusion in "Shrew." The man was filthy! It's this complex interplay of surface, text and subtext that has made his works last, and remain relevant over the ages. But, Bill WAS a dirty old man. Which just makes me love him all the more!

As I mentioned on another thread, I've often wanted to do a version of "Shrew" where Pete was portrayed as a leatherman, (complete with singletail) his household a playspace dungeon, and Kat ends up going back to her sister's wedding dressed in a latex cat outfit that would make Midori drool. She would then be, as he promises at one point, "tamed, and mode conformable with other household Kates." (I would pony up $10. to see THAT, wouldn't you?)




Missokyst -> RE: Taming of Shrews (3/25/2008 5:03:59 PM)

I saw an interesting interpretation of The Taming of the Shrew on a cable channel designed for young teens.  The show is called Degrassi, on the channel The_N.com
In it a couple does their reading of it using a modern interpretation. 
Petrucio is an abusive man out to tame Katherine by brow beating her into submission.
It was fascinating!  To watch those kids translate Shakespeare in that way brought to mind my own reaction to that play when I was younger.
I give my submission not because someone demands it from me.  But because for me, my reaction to some men requires that I turn over the reigns. 
Kyst




MontrealPhoenix -> RE: Taming of Shrews (3/25/2008 7:29:37 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: softness

The Taming of The Shrew has always been one of my favourite plays by Shakespeare; combination of D/s and slapstick, sexist early modern literature at its best. I have always adored and self identified as Katharina..and secretly desired Petruchio. My personal interpretation of the play has changed as many times as I have read it.

So imagine my delight when I get it read back to me by Sir . We refer back often to her final speech in V.2 (links included here)  http://www.online-literature.com/shakespeare/shrew/14/ as it is the best and most complete model of what we believe a woman's place to be. It is something that has spoken to both of us .. before we met eachother, before we even met the lifestyle.

This thread is not to debate the role of women and the balance of power between the sexes...but something of far greater personal importance to me. I look at the characeter of Katharina ..and see myself... I am more than a little bit of a Shrew.. .. Sir  recently described me as "a bit of bulldog, remind me to keep you leashed" .. He  says I have rapier like wit ... I know that I intimidate people, and actively exploit their weaknesses. I  sometimes look at people and work out how I could crush them like a bug, my favourite way to unwind after work.. is to eviscerate someone in a chatroom or forum thread .. kinky or vanilla... am not too bothered. In fact, looking at it ... I could probably take Katharina in a fight.

So I have frequently struggled to watch her "downfall" into submission ... I have mourned for the loss of her spirit and vim. I have opted for the personal interpretation that she is being ironic in her submission, or biding her time (topping from the bottom if you will). As a scholar ..a serious one .. this is a crappy interpretation .. and beneath me. But I look at the woman she becomes, and it took me along time to see that she was actually happier that way than she was before, it still made me mourn her loss, but i could evetually see her gain by being submissive to her husband. The other day W/we were having and discussion about my pride and needing to be right and He read me this section http://www.online-literature.com/shakespeare/shrew/12/  .. and for this I fished out my rather battered copy of the play.I took it to bed that night to try to learn her final speech by heart...and in the notes I found this excellent piece of critical analysis.

"The truth is that Kate's greatest victory is, with the help of Petruchio, over herself. She has come to accept that she has enough worth and merit and can be content without having the last word and scaring everybody. She is all that she once was, merely choosing not to direct it at the man who loves her,but for the man who loves her."  (R B Heilman,1966)

and then also

"Kate has the uncommon good fortune to find Petruchio, who is man enough to know what he wants, and exactly how to get it. He wants Katharina, but on his terms, as opposed to hers." (Germaine Greer, 1970) 

Kate is not the broken version of Katharina ...not the diminished, doormatted version of Katherina. She is every bit of the woman that Katharina was (intelligent, witty, terrifying, powerful) , but Kate has something new, she is also the woman that Katharine could be but was not. Petruchio adores her spirit and passion and bite, he just doesn't want it directed at him.(look at the very beginning ofV.2 for evidence of this)  He doesn't kill it, he just directs it elsewhere. He allows Kate to be everything she once was AND to be a happy and contented woman. This gave me great personal comfort, especially when I read it to Sir and He just laughed and said "Finally!..you get it"

So... fellow Shrews ... how does this sit with you? Do you think Kate is a better woman than Katharina?...or has she diminshed in your eyes?
Unshrew like submissives and slaves... how do you feel about Kates in the lifestyle? Dowe have our place?
Aspiring Petruchios.... is this how you want your Kates?... or do you want the unthinking submissive she can also be seen to be?
Dominants... would you want to take this woman and turn her ... or take Bianca and beat some manners into her?

and the secret to breaking a woman?... Petruchio manages it keeping her hungry and sleep deprived ...and horny  (sounding VERY familiar to me right now!)


After reading this i just had to write you to thank you. Like you, i mourned the woman Katerina was after Petruchio "broke" her - until i read this. I can now see that Petruchio didn't break her, he made her a better woman. Reading the paragraph i bolded, a light bulb went off, a great big 400 watt lightbulb. I cannot thank you enough for this as Katerina is one of my alltime favorite characters.
 
Phoenix




IronBear -> RE: Taming of Shrews (3/25/2008 8:22:52 PM)

The version I saw on film years ago started the late Richard Burton and Elizabeth Taylor, at the time both commented that Taylor simply played herself as did Burton.  For SZhakespear buffs there is a lote which could be taken from his works I'm sure. I juyst enjoy the writing with  favourites being Henery V, Midsummer Night's Dream and The Merchant of Venis. Not for everyonre I agree nor is one of kmy favourite books "Canterbry Tales" by Chauser. My copy is as it was written atg a time where there was no grammar or spelling  lolk make for fun reading. 

Iron Bear
Master of Bruin Cottage
(A Victorian Lifestyle poly home)


"I judge a Man by what I see him do and not by what others tell me he does." (
Captain Sir Edward Pellew of the HMS Indefatigable to Midshipman Hornblower ~ C.S. Forrester)




bipolarber -> RE: Taming of Shrews (3/25/2008 9:15:16 PM)

Everyone remembers the Burton/Taylor version. But for my money, I'll take the BBC/PBS production with John Cleese as Petruchio.




RumpusParable -> RE: Taming of Shrews (3/25/2008 9:41:55 PM)

In my reading of The Taming and in all viewing and schooling/discussions of it I've never gotten the sense that Kate has changed in the least.  She hasn't submitted in the slightest, hasn't given over or become softer -rather, she and Petruchio find an understanding of matched wills and partner in it.  In the play there is no point of breaking or taming Kate in their private life, only in her playing submissive when he indicates he wants her to, and then suddenly the Big Speech of Submission.  Her speech isn't a sign of her submission, but a false display of submission in front others in an understanding with her spouse... they join together in manipulating others.  The name "The Taming..." being more a bit of humor, with a touch of sardonicism.




Sundowner -> RE: Taming of Shrews (3/26/2008 2:03:14 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: IronBear

The version I saw on film years ago started the late Richard Burton and Elizabeth Taylor, at the time both commented that Taylor simply played herself as did Burton. 
....


Hits the spot for me.   (And if you've seen it you'll either agree or disagree, so no further comment).




HalloweenWhite -> RE: Taming of Shrews (3/26/2008 4:40:33 AM)

I have to say, I've never been much of a fan of his work, but I think the modern re-telling of some of his plays are really interesting. I -never- liked "The taming of the shrew" because I always thought the relationship wasn't really based on fair play,let alone S.S.C, I saw a modern version on t.v a few years back staringt the woman who played "Moaning Minnie" in a "Harry Potter" film, I have to say, her husband treated her in that was rough-starving her,insulting her,humiliating, and verbally abusing her.




softness -> RE: Taming of Shrews (3/26/2008 8:12:14 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: HalloweenWhite

I saw a modern version on t.v a few years back staringt the woman who played
"Moaning Minnie" in a "Harry Potter" film, I have to say, her husband treated her in that was rough-starving her,insulting her,humiliating, and verbally abusing her.


Shakespeare Retold ... they did a bloody brilliant Macbeth as well .. though the Dream and Much Ado were a bit damp.

hot wasn't it!.... *loves* that production ... but then I am a strong woman who needs some stronger to pick me up by the hair, throw me around some, degrade me, humiliate me and prove He has the required strength to pick me back up again afterwards.




HalloweenWhite -> RE: Taming of Shrews (3/26/2008 12:44:36 PM)

Thats it. As I'm writing this I'm suddenly remembering "A midsummer nights dream" was it set at some kind of party or out door "do"? if its the one Im thinking about I agree with you, it was dull. As far as the rest of your post I think it's fine to behave in -that- way as long as its not meant simply to beat someone into submission who doesn't want/need/like/enjoy that kind of treatment and won't be  [negatively] affected by it, which you clearly aren't. You sound a hell of a lot of fun! :).

On another possibly thread hijacking note ( lol) I liked the Chaucer ones they did on BBC as well.




Wickad -> RE: Taming of Shrews (3/26/2008 1:14:23 PM)

(fast reply)

Greetings,

On a slightly different point ....

I've always found it comical that after a man tames his shrew into being the exact woman he professes to want ... he loses interest in her.  "The Taming of the Shrew" never does get into what happens when the main characters return home to a life of 'bliss' - lol.

Wickad




softness -> RE: Taming of Shrews (3/26/2008 1:53:01 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wickad


he loses interest in her.  "The Taming of the Shrew" never does get into what happens when the main characters return home to a life of 'bliss' - lol.




the last thing he does in the entire play is to passionately kiss her infront of the whole cast ...thinks reading between the lines is in order




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875