celticlord2112
Posts: 5732
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyEllen So, you want me to publish an entire manifesto here on CM, with costed accounting for each measure and requisite tax income and sources presumably? Such a project is not beyond me, but to produce such is not a matter of a few moments and would not be suitable material for this site. Who exactly is prepared to wait for several months for my post and who exactly would be prepared to read it when it was completed in all of its thousands of pages glory I wonder? I have stated the broad methodology I would adopt - overhauling the justice system and overhauling the socio-economic model. I will state the broad policy objectives too which are to produce a better functioning society and nation by making it inclusive with opportunity for all to achieve, with more significant penalties for those who choose not to take advantage of the opportunity to achieve in a socially beneficial way. To produce a coherent society and nation where the interests of the individual are identical with the interests of the whole, and vice versa. To produce a society and nation which is empowered thereby and a government which represents the interests of the people, not of overseas financiers or minority interest groups. And to produce a society and nation which recognises that each person is unique and that to throw anyone away as our current model does, is wholly misguided and represents a direct loss to the common wealth. Now, am I a fascist or a commie, I wonder? E With what you're describing here, you're a Marxist (classic protean Communist), with more of bend towards Trotsky than Lenin. My view of things is that your objectives are inherently self-defeating, because the interests of the individual never align perfectly with the interests of a larger group. Perception is too variable, desire too demanding, to allow for such perfect alignment to occur naturally. It is worth noting that totalitarian systems, from the Roman Empire on through the Soviet Union and China, are more capricious and less moral than democratically derived systems. My argument is ever for individual freedom and liberty, with the full brunt of consequence coming down on each individual for whatever choices he or she makes, and whatever acts he or she commits.
_____________________________
|