RE: drug gangs' new stock in trade (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message

RealityLicks -> RE: drug gangs' new stock in trade (4/3/2008 12:18:40 PM)

Exactly, bootsy, it was raised 2 years ago BY THE BNP.  Hardly the most trusted of news sources. 

Incidentally, the number of BNP members who have been convicted of drug dealing is much higher than the average "perfectly respectable political party". Oddly, that is not a bar on membership but they won't tolerate the Greek person who wanted to join their happy clan.



LadyEllen -> RE: drug gangs' new stock in trade (4/3/2008 12:24:27 PM)

So Panorama (or whoever it was that made the programme) is an organ of the BNP?

E



RealityLicks -> RE: drug gangs' new stock in trade (4/3/2008 12:30:48 PM)

Panorama is one of the last vestiges of the BBC's tradition in current affairs and sadly, if it is to survive in a primetime slot, it must dumb down relentlessly.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/04/01/ndumb01.xml



seeksfemslave -> RE: drug gangs' new stock in trade (4/3/2008 3:07:10 PM)

Reality: it matters not who is the source of the info. What matters is whether it is true .
The scandal of this story is that the police knew what was happening and did nothing probably because those who take operational decisions  knew their job/pension  might be at risk due to the PC "elite"

If you think I am wrong check up on what happened to the Manchester Chief Constable who made a speech saying that "homosexuals were swirling around  in a cesspit of their own making."
Anderton I believe was his name



Politesub53 -> RE: drug gangs' new stock in trade (4/3/2008 3:24:47 PM)

RL, If you had seen last nights show, Manchester police said this problem had increased, due to the success of efforts stopping gangs from bringing young women from abroad. You were the one who mentioned hysteria, so providing me with a couple of links about ONE court case must prove you right and me right wing, two rights dont make a wrong btw :) .
You also made claims about me reading the Daily Mail, as if that adds to your weak argument. If you actually read my post, you would have seen i said the perpertrators came from ALL backgrounds. It suits your argument to muddy the waters and mention the Mail and the BNP, im suprised you didnt mention Maggie as per usual. [;)]

Ill ask you again, where is the mass hysteria that you mention ?



Level -> RE: drug gangs' new stock in trade (4/3/2008 4:10:25 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: seeksfemslave
Female homosexuality should be broadcast on late night television. That would keep the troublemaking little rascals off the streets.


Allll right. We have an answer! [:D]



RealityLicks -> RE: drug gangs' new stock in trade (4/3/2008 4:22:55 PM)

As my earlier post indicated, politesub, the police have not stemmed the flow of young women from abroad from many countries, which makes it doubly stupid to focus on this non-story.  You've chosen not to address this so I see you've brought your usual level of perspicacity to this issue, which lessens the appeal of the debate.  [sm=lol.gif]

Your fetishisation of Maggie Thatcher is your own affair, although I understand that those who share it can never fathom those of us that don't.  I don't expect you'll broaden your views due to my modest postings, so I hope they comfort you as much as they amuse me. 



Level -> RE: drug gangs' new stock in trade (4/3/2008 4:27:37 PM)

A lot of the social ills we see comes from shitty parenting. We get a ton of kids in our office, and many of the parents, to a large degree, are clueless, weak, or unconcerned. It doesn't make for a stellar young citizen.



Politesub53 -> RE: drug gangs' new stock in trade (4/3/2008 4:35:14 PM)

RL, your earlier link was a year old, how can i raise my level of perspicacity when you cant even keep track of the date. You would only get lost [8D]



RealityLicks -> RE: drug gangs' new stock in trade (4/3/2008 4:43:38 PM)

The link was a year old because the Channel4 doc on the same subject was due to be broadcast a year ago.  That was the whole point: there has been a great deal of media coverage of this and nothing on the issue as reported on by the NSPCC.  Maybe you need to go back and read the whole thread again, I've got to be up in the morning.



Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
1.367188E-02