RE: Relying on Faith Instead of Facts Brought Moral Calamity (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


Owner59 -> RE: Relying on Faith Instead of Facts Brought Moral Calamity (4/13/2008 7:42:17 AM)

Or maybe McCain can`t retain as well as he once did.

The guy is over 70.







NorthernGent -> RE: Relying on Faith Instead of Facts Brought Moral Calamity (4/13/2008 7:49:00 AM)

I come from a nation that has presented itself as the most docile on earth; yet; the same nation has been mauling foreign pies since it found the wood to build a few ships. No one seems to notice, which is by design.

If you think these people - including the US government with the resources at their disposal to exercise a serious amount of control, and with the benefit of hindsight - don't know what they're doing, I think they've got you eating out of the palm of their collective hand.





seeksfemslave -> RE: Relying on Faith Instead of Facts Brought Moral Calamity (4/13/2008 7:55:42 AM)

Had Owner59  not have  bruised my ego by calling me a "simplistic user of few phrases" I was not going to point out  that Aquilifer  actually confirmed, in lots of phrases, what I had said in a few.

Just because Aquilifer mistakenly equates fundamentalism only with Al Queda is no reason to believe that what I said is wrong.
Seeks says:Sunnis and Shias have been killing each other with gusto these last 3/4 years
quote:

Aquilifer says
There are also multiple factions within the Shiites community as a whole, and they are quite capable of killing each other by the truckload.
 That is the the root cause of the disaster that is present day Iraq.




NorthernGent -> RE: Relying on Faith Instead of Facts Brought Moral Calamity (4/13/2008 7:57:19 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: seeksfemslave

That is the the root cause of the disaster that is present day Iraq.



In keeping with the spirit of the above sentiment, how do you qualify the fact that the chaos started when the occupying forces arrived?




seeksfemslave -> RE: Relying on Faith Instead of Facts Brought Moral Calamity (4/13/2008 8:18:24 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: NorthernGent
quote:

ORIGINAL: seeks claimed that
Sunni/Shia conflict is at the heart of the current disaster in Iraq.
NG then  asks .
In keeping with the spirit of the above sentiment, 
how do you qualify the fact that the chaos started when the occupying forces arrived?

Seeks shakes his head and says this is how
http://www.csis.org/media/csis/pubs/070402_iraq_spring.pdf
quote:

Since its inception in the spring of 2003, the nature of the fighting in Iraq has evolved from a struggle between Coalition forces and former regime loyalists to a much more diffuse mix of conflicts, involving a number of Sunni groups, Shi’ite militias, and foreign jihadists. The insurgency is now dominated by Neo-Salafi Sunni extremists, seeking religious and ideological goals that extend far beyond Iraq
Aquilifer knows this, I know it, now we all know it.

NG you spend too much time reading the Guardian/Independant who associate the invasion of Iraq with the subseqent internecine killing in Iraq.
Just use those newspapers to keep your chips in and listen to me OK?




NorthernGent -> RE: Relying on Faith Instead of Facts Brought Moral Calamity (4/13/2008 8:24:31 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: seeksfemslave

Seeks shakes his head and says this is how
http://www.csis.org/media/csis/pubs/070402_iraq_spring.pdf

Since its inception in the spring of 2003, the nature of the fighting in Iraq has evolved from a struggle between Coalition forces and former regime loyalists to a much more diffuse mix of conflicts, involving a number of Sunni groups, Shi’ite militias, and foreign jihadists. The insurgency is now dominated by Neo-Salafi Sunni extremists, seeking religious and ideological goals that extend far beyond Iraq



'All well and good, but I'm struggling to see how the above is a rebuttal of my comment to which you responded.




Aquilifer -> RE: Relying on Faith Instead of Facts Brought Moral Calamity (4/13/2008 8:55:18 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: seeksfemslave
Just because Aquilifer mistakenly equates fundamentalism only with Al Queda ...

No, I did not.

This is basic reading comprehension and you muffed it.  Reread, please.




kdsub -> RE: Relying on Faith Instead of Facts Brought Moral Calamity (4/13/2008 9:27:12 AM)

Why do you and your source link assume that religion has anything to do with this war?
At least on the US side. You claim it is framed as Christians against Muslims. I think this is your framing not reality. You are being suckered in by anti-war propaganda.

I do believe that many Muslims believe it is a Christian against Muslim war but that does not make it true. Muslims are mostly unable to separate government from their religion. Therefore an attack on their government is also an attack on their religion.

Most in America supported the government’s action in Iraq and they were not rightwing religious fanatics. We felt attacked by terrorists and wanted to punish those responsible…terrorists not Muslims. Our shame is how our inept government responded.

Butch




Aquilifer -> RE: Relying on Faith Instead of Facts Brought Moral Calamity (4/13/2008 9:31:13 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: seeksfemslave
quote:

Aquilifer says
There are also multiple factions within the Shiites community as a whole, and they are quite capable of killing each other by the truckload.
 That is the the root cause of the disaster that is present day Iraq.

'Fraid not.

The root cause was the invasion, plus the particularly clueless way in which the occupation was handled.

F. Paul Bremer jump-started the insurgency by his own colossal gullibility and incompetence.  Together with the Kool-Aid the neoconservatives were chugging by the gallon.

They actually believed and trusted Ahmed Chalabi.  And they figured they could install him as the next dictator of Iraq.

Chalabi and his new friends badly miscalculated.

Had we chosen to co-opt the leaderless 400,000 man army Saddam had effectively abandoned, they would not only have served as an effective security force from day zero, they also would not have been thrown out of work in a collapsed economy.

Add the rather ugly tactics that were used to try to extract information about nonexistent WMDs from Iraqis who didn't have anything to tell us except fables (yeah, I'm talking about torture), and we created our own worst nightmare.

Out of work, these 400,000 military age men had no great reason to love us.

Once we started systematically abusing Iraqis, they rapidly developed reasons to despise us.

Things promptly went down the toilet.  This nascent opposition had no hiearchical structure.  It started as a leaderless group of pissed-off people whose former political authority (Saddam Hussein) had pretty effectively de-legitimitized itself.  So there was no structure there that we could uncover by interrogation or enticement or by any other means whatsoever.

Once the ball got rolling, AQI came in and set up shop.  But they have never amounted to much.  The major players, besides the Coalition, have been the Badr Brigades, the Mahdi Army loyal to al Sadr, the peshmerga, and the formless Sunni-dominated insurgency.  And none of these groups is all that cohesive.
  • The Coalition has been shedding members as money, or political support for the war at home, or stomach for torture, or whatever the particular limiting resource was, kicked in.
  • The Sunni insurgency has always been a nearly perfect showpiece example of what a fourth generation insurgency should look like.  The don't have anything, including organizational structure, that they don't need.  They're completely decentralized so there's no heirachy to force a surrender from.  They farm out things like IED manufacture, for instance, to craft specialists in a decentralized marketplace - one of John Robb's "bazaars of violence" almost to a "T".
  • The Shiites are anything but unified.  The example that comes to mind most quickly, of course, is the divergence in purposes and loyalties between the Badr Brigades and al Sadr's people.
  • The peshmerga are about as close to a centrally controlled body of armed force as there is over there, with the exception of foreign nation-state armies like ours.
In "Brave New War", John Robb mentioned that there are about 75 different splinter groups in Iraq that we know about. .

Gods only know how many there are which have gone completely below our poor radar.  People aren't eager to volunteer information to us if it's liable to get them blown up.  They are even less likely if the people who want to know also have a reputation for running torture chambers and aren't too choosy about whom they stuff into them.

But if we had not invaded the country in the first place, this process of fission would never have taken place.




seeksfemslave -> RE: Relying on Faith Instead of Facts Brought Moral Calamity (4/13/2008 11:48:37 AM)

It seems to me that every time he posts Aquilifer demonstrates my point; which is that the the major problem post invasion is the internal hatred, to the the point of mass murder, that exists between the different factions in the region.

It is only true that pre invasion such emnity was not apparent because Saddam wielded a very big stick, which he used ruthlessly whenever it became necessary to extirminate or oppress the opposition.

Having removed the big stick and offered the Iraquis the opportunity to govern themselves, only to see them turn on one another , points to the fundamentalists in the region as being culpable IMO.

America in particular and the West in general were disliked long before 2003 but the West's presence there is non negotiable while we are so dependant on Oil.
That fact may upset the bleeding hearts... but it is TRUE.




Aquilifer -> RE: Relying on Faith Instead of Facts Brought Moral Calamity (4/13/2008 12:46:22 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: seeksfemslave
Having removed the big stick and offered the Iraquis the opportunity to govern themselves, only to see them turn on one another , points to the fundamentalists in the region as being culpable IMO.

That does not follow.  All it says is that the potential schisms in Iraqi society were deep enough to turn violent if properly excabrated.  It makes no distiction betweeen tribalism and multinationalism and religious sectarianism as motivators.

At a guess, I would say that tribalism and perceived political disenfranchisment are the primary engines we set loose when we first invaded, and then bungled the occupation.

quote:

America in particular and the West in general were disliked long before 2003 but the West's presence there is non negotiable while we are so dependant on Oil.
That fact may upset the bleeding hearts... but it is TRUE.

And that's working so WELL, isn't it?

Oli is up to what?  $110 a barrel or thereabouts?  And rising, with no ceiling in sight.

Gas at the pump is $3.50 per gallon if you're lucky.

It was around a $1.00 a gallon prior to Commander Codpiece's war.




hisannabelle -> RE: Relying on Faith Instead of Facts Brought Moral Calamity (4/13/2008 1:49:19 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

I do believe that many Muslims believe it is a Christian against Muslim war but that does not make it true. Muslims are mostly unable to separate government from their religion. Therefore an attack on their government is also an attack on their religion.


tell that to muslims in this country whose situations have noticeably changed since the beginning of the war. tell that to muslims in america who face continuous discrimination and unfair litmus tests (a la daniel pipes) when trying to set up islamic schools, while catholic schools who do the exact same things are not condemned. the actual situation in iraq itself may not be a christian vs. muslim war, and i certainly don't believe it's so black and white here, but there is definitely a situation of christianity being systematically favored (as usual) over all religions in america, and islam is the new token minority since 9/11. i don't think it's all that unfathomable that muslims here and in islamic nations would look at that, look at how our government talks about this war, and draw the conclusion that america sees itself as a christian nation crusading against islam.




farglebargle -> RE: Relying on Faith Instead of Facts Brought Moral Calamity (4/13/2008 1:49:37 PM)

quote:

F. Paul Bremer


LOL! My hat is off to you!





farglebargle -> RE: Relying on Faith Instead of Facts Brought Moral Calamity (4/13/2008 1:51:02 PM)

quote:

Having removed the big stick and offered the Iraqis the opportunity to govern themselves, only to see them turn on one another


That *is* how they govern themselves.





kdsub -> RE: Relying on Faith Instead of Facts Brought Moral Calamity (4/13/2008 5:29:48 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: hisannabelle

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

I do believe that many Muslims believe it is a Christian against Muslim war but that does not make it true. Muslims are mostly unable to separate government from their religion. Therefore an attack on their government is also an attack on their religion.


tell that to muslims in this country whose situations have noticeably changed since the beginning of the war. tell that to muslims in america who face continuous discrimination and unfair litmus tests (a la daniel pipes) when trying to set up islamic schools, while catholic schools who do the exact same things are not condemned. the actual situation in iraq itself may not be a christian vs. muslim war, and i certainly don't believe it's so black and white here, but there is definitely a situation of christianity being systematically favored (as usual) over all religions in america, and islam is the new token minority since 9/11. i don't think it's all that unfathomable that muslims here and in islamic nations would look at that, look at how our government talks about this war, and draw the conclusion that america sees itself as a christian nation crusading against islam.



You would be wrong... your very presence in America is proof...Now let me see if I remember right...if you were in Afghanistan and wanted to convert to Christianity or Judaism... what would happen to you?

Yet here you are free to convert to any religion you wish… you are also free to try and convert others… try that in Saudi Arabia.

In Iraq as well as many Islamic countries... if you are a Christian you are in danger of death...not just common discrimination.

Please don't preach poor discriminated Muslim in America to me. You  have as much personal and religious freedom here then any place on earth.

I am not dismissing discrimination...  it is a product of the war...not the cause and is a part of human nature.


Butch




seeksfemslave -> RE: Relying on Faith Instead of Facts Brought Moral Calamity (4/13/2008 5:54:35 PM)

Aquilifer points out that since the invasion of Iraq the cost of Oil per barrel   has spiralled  and hints and probably believes that the one caused the other.

In fact this website
http://www.mees.com/Energy_Tables/crude2003.htm
shows that this century the volume of Oil delivered to the market from OPEC nations has been to a first approximation a constant at about 25 thousand barrels a day.

Also since Iraq has only ever supplied about 10% of the worlds supply of Oil and at one point was the subject of an embargo , ie the West chose to prohibit the supply of Iraqui oil,  does it not follow that the cause of the massive rise in Oil costs lies elsewhere ?
Only arskin'.




Level -> RE: Relying on Faith Instead of Facts Brought Moral Calamity (4/13/2008 6:08:49 PM)

I'm just guessing here, but I think the war, in part, affects the price due to causing jitters in the market, and the world demand is ever-increasing.




hisannabelle -> RE: Relying on Faith Instead of Facts Brought Moral Calamity (4/13/2008 9:13:09 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub
You would be wrong... your very presence in America is proof...Now let me see if I remember right...if you were in Afghanistan and wanted to convert to Christianity or Judaism... what would happen to you?

Yet here you are free to convert to any religion you wish… you are also free to try and convert others… try that in Saudi Arabia.

In Iraq as well as many Islamic countries... if you are a Christian you are in danger of death...not just common discrimination.

Please don't preach poor discriminated Muslim in America to me. You  have as much personal and religious freedom here then any place on earth.

I am not dismissing discrimination...  it is a product of the war...not the cause and is a part of human nature.
Butch


i'm not preaching anything; i was born here and it is thanks to at least nominal and partly legal separation of church and state that i am a muslim studying buddhism. if not for that i'd probably still be a southern baptist and bible school or catholic school would be the only place where i'd be allowed to study religion.

i'm simply pointing out that if you want to investigate why muslims might be viewing this as a religious conflict (and certainly not all, and not even most, do), looking at the situation of muslims in america and in other western countries (especially since the beginning of the conflict) and at the rhetoric preached about muslims by mainstream media and government might be a place to start. muslims who are in a position to make decisions and have a voice are fully aware of the situation of muslims and islam in western countries; most have traveled to western countries or are westerners who've moved to arab nations, not just backward fundamentalists whose only experience of the west is what they heard in terrorist training camp. these things don't develop in a vaccuum, and they aren't simply there just because islam is supposed to be a way of life. the idea that they are, which your earlier post outright said, is reductionist and oversimplified.

i also do not and have never believed that the relative freedom offered in america is an excuse not to criticize the downfalls and sometimes woeful inadequacy of our supposed separation of church and state. i didn't believe that as a christian, i didn't believe it as a buddhist, and i don't believe it as a muslim. i didn't believe it when i was in catholic school and i don't believe it in public school. i didn't believe it when i was employed by a christian company, i didn't believe it when i was employed by a muslim company, and i don't believe it when i'm employed by secular companies. the ability of an american-born american citizen whose family has been here for generations to criticize her own government's approach to secularism has to be protected REGARDLESS of what her religious beliefs are, or else what is the point of all this blah-blahing about democratic process, anyway?

respectfully,
annabelle.




Estring -> RE: Relying on Faith Instead of Facts Brought Moral Calamity (4/13/2008 9:19:09 PM)

Interesting how every intelligence agency in the world must be of the same faith. They all came to the same conclusion that Saddam had WMDs. Probably because he gave the impression that he had them. So in reality, the truth should be, "Saddam lied, Saddam died".
It just never ceases to amaze me the nutty thinking that goes on here.




meatcleaver -> RE: Relying on Faith Instead of Facts Brought Moral Calamity (4/14/2008 1:18:22 AM)

Now what shall I believe in today?

A friendly old man on cloud nine who loves everyone and doesn't like to see anyone suffer so if you love him, he will love you but if you don't, boy oh boy, you're going to have to face his wrath and life for you is going to be hell on earth! He'd going to send those people who love him to smite you and rain cruise missiles down on you and run tanks over your homes and blow your children to pieces. But these people are only carrrying out gods will because they believe and love god and god loves them and if you loved god and believed in bank America, god would love you too and we could all live happy ever after.

Roll another baby, I'm on a roll and while I'm at it, where's that beautiful gook to give me a blow job.

All's well and happy, its just another day at camp Moses.




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875