RE: Sexual objectification party (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


SubJordanTyler -> RE: Sexual objectification party (4/16/2008 1:47:37 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Leatherist

If you set things up right-there can be a totally dehumanizing and humiliating aspect to this.

My evil little mind immediately flashed to this scenario when this was mentioned. First-most swinger men are entirely focused on the woman getting off. It's a big part of that culture.

So I would not neccesarily think of this as "a bunch of swingers."

But let's move along. Four or five women arrive after being briefed..Then they get briefs removed, and packed into boxes.

Something where they have a bar across thier bellies.....then folded back with legs up. Nicely bound. Then the box closes, leaving them in darkness. Only thier asses are sticking out, surrounded by a padded gasket..They cannot see or hear anything. The party handler begins preparing them for the guests. They soon find themselves with enema nozzles up thier asses, getting cleaned out. After that......bladders drained with catheters.

All this time, the boxes hold them snug and tight. They know that the handlers and guest can watch thier reactions through built in viewers. But they cannot see in turn. Gloved Fingers are slipping up thier cunts and assholes, lubricating them profusely. Then the first cock drives home.

And more, and more, and they have no idea of who they belong to.....only that they only exist as fuckholes in those moments. And that no one really cares if they are enjoying it.

Wouldn't that be special?[;)]


The whole idea of not being able to see or hear was discussed before I did this, but as I had been blindfolded once before and it sent me into a panic, it was best not to do that.  Not being able to see is something I can't handle well.  I also didn't do the enemas in front of others - but that would have added more humilation to it.

But I can safely say I was nothing more than a fuckhole - and nobody cared if I enjoyed it or how uncomfortable it was or how much it hurt.........and my asshole was so sore from it that it took a day or two for me to recover.  But, as said before, I absolutely loved it and would do it again tomorrow.




SubJordanTyler -> RE: Sexual objectification party (4/16/2008 1:49:16 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BossyShoeBitch

quote:

ORIGINAL: SubJordanTyler

It's definitely an aspect of humiliation.  When you're being passed around among 10-15 people and they are just shoving things into your mouth and ass, it's not really that likely you're going to be aroused by it.  It's a mental thing - being thought of as a thing and not a person - just an object.  When it was over, I was very sore and very tired, but it was an incredible feeling - and to be able to say I made it through something like that was a feeling of accomplishment.  I really did enjoy it all.

sjt,
Almost every single one of your posts makes me think of you as a real life Hentai character.. (Which if you knew me, you would know that is a very good thing..)


I suppose I should say thanks!!........as that sounds like a high compliment.  But since I don't know you, you'll have to explain that to me a little more, as I don't quite get the meaning behind it.  I'd love to know though.




SimplyMichael -> RE: Sexual objectification party (4/16/2008 1:50:34 PM)

BSB loves sick twisted Hentai porn, she spends more on porn than every guy I know combined.  Trust me, it was a compliment of the highest order.




SubJordanTyler -> RE: Sexual objectification party (4/16/2008 3:49:18 PM)

Cool!!  Glad to hear that!!




breatheasone -> RE: Sexual objectification party (4/16/2008 6:15:24 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Leatherist

If you set things up right-there can be a totally dehumanizing and humiliating aspect to this.

My evil little mind immediately flashed to this scenario when this was mentioned. First-most swinger men are entirely focused on the woman getting off. It's a big part of that culture.

So I would not neccesarily think of this as "a bunch of swingers."

But let's move along. Four or five women arrive after being briefed..Then they get briefs removed, and packed into boxes.

Something where they have a bar across thier bellies.....then folded back with legs up. Nicely bound. Then the box closes, leaving them in darkness. Only thier asses are sticking out, surrounded by a padded gasket..They cannot see or hear anything. The party handler begins preparing them for the guests. They soon find themselves with enema nozzles up thier asses, getting cleaned out. After that......bladders drained with catheters.

All this time, the boxes hold them snug and tight. They know that the handlers and guest can watch thier reactions through built in viewers. But they cannot see in turn. Gloved Fingers are slipping up thier cunts and assholes, lubricating them profusely. Then the first cock drives home.

And more, and more, and they have no idea of who they belong to.....only that they only exist as fuckholes in those moments. And that no one really cares if they are enjoying it.

Wouldn't that be special?[;)]

OMFG!!! If I say any more then that i'll just embarrass myself...LOL  It sounds VERY intriguing.




junecleaver -> RE: Sexual objectification party (4/16/2008 8:47:51 PM)

My reaction is...um...when can I set one up at my TNG?  I like that the objects got to have limitations.  It's definitely a fantasy of mine, but sometimes things are best left at fantasy so I don't know.[8|]




SubJordanTyler -> RE: Sexual objectification party (4/16/2008 9:47:01 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: junecleaver

My reaction is...um...when can I set one up at my TNG?  I like that the objects got to have limitations.  It's definitely a fantasy of mine, but sometimes things are best left at fantasy so I don't know.[8|]


I'd definitely volunteer to be one of the objects.  [:D]




Amadio -> RE: Sexual objectification party (4/17/2008 1:05:30 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster

One thing I've never understood about Tristan Taormino is her name.  Tristan is a man's name!  In fact, it's about as masculine as a name can be.  (It's from Tristan and Isolde.)

I enjoy her writing though; it's light but fun.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Amadio

I was reading an article by Tristan Taormino for the villiage voice.



Unless fantasy has become memory, the first time I met Tristan was in Denver at Thunder in the Mountains when she was buying canes from me. She was in a Boyscout uniform, and  I felt her name was fitting. I've been a fan of hers ever since.   Where my memory gets foggy is I can't remember if she was in the uniform or one of her friends, either way I love her.




Cuffkinks -> RE: Sexual objectification party (4/17/2008 2:44:45 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Leatherist

But let's move along. Four or five women arrive after being briefed..Then they get briefs removed, and packed into boxes.

Something where they have a bar across thier bellies.....then folded back with legs up. Nicely bound. Then the box closes, leaving them in darkness. Only thier asses are sticking out, surrounded by a padded gasket..They cannot see or hear anything. The party handler begins preparing them for the guests. They soon find themselves with enema nozzles up thier asses, getting cleaned out. After that......bladders drained with catheters.

All this time, the boxes hold them snug and tight. They know that the handlers and guest can watch thier reactions through built in viewers. But they cannot see in turn. Gloved Fingers are slipping up thier cunts and assholes, lubricating them profusely. Then the first cock drives home.

And more, and more, and they have no idea of who they belong to.....only that they only exist as fuckholes in those moments. And that no one really cares if they are enjoying it.

Wouldn't that be special?[;)]


  Now that sounds like a fun time. If I may add My own spin...
I like that they can't see anything, but rather than have them not be able to hear anything, I'd have them able to hear each other inside the box, but nothing outside. Not being able to see, but still hearing the sounds made by the other "objects" caused by the various things being done to them could make the other "objects" wonder what was happening to that "object" and what might happen to them...and when. 
  Just a little bit of a mind-fuck to go along with the objectification / humiliation.

  So...Who's throwing this party?




BossyShoeBitch -> RE: Sexual objectification party (4/17/2008 4:21:20 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SimplyMichael

BSB loves sick twisted Hentai porn, she spends more on porn than every guy I know combined.  Trust me, it was a compliment of the highest order.

Thank you Daddy!  I couldn't have explained that better myself!  [:)]




CreativeDominant -> RE: Sexual objectification party (4/17/2008 7:39:28 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Cuffkinks

quote:

ORIGINAL: Leatherist

But let's move along. Four or five women arrive after being briefed..Then they get briefs removed, and packed into boxes.

Something where they have a bar across thier bellies.....then folded back with legs up. Nicely bound. Then the box closes, leaving them in darkness. Only thier asses are sticking out, surrounded by a padded gasket..They cannot see or hear anything. The party handler begins preparing them for the guests. They soon find themselves with enema nozzles up thier asses, getting cleaned out. After that......bladders drained with catheters.

All this time, the boxes hold them snug and tight. They know that the handlers and guest can watch thier reactions through built in viewers. But they cannot see in turn. Gloved Fingers are slipping up thier cunts and assholes, lubricating them profusely. Then the first cock drives home.

And more, and more, and they have no idea of who they belong to.....only that they only exist as fuckholes in those moments. And that no one really cares if they are enjoying it.

Wouldn't that be special?[;)]


Now that sounds like a fun time. If I may add My own spin...
I like that they can't see anything, but rather than have them not be able to hear anything, I'd have them able to hear each other inside the box, but nothing outside. Not being able to see, but still hearing the sounds made by the other "objects" caused by the various things being done to them could make the other "objects" wonder what was happening to that "object" and what might happen to them...and when. 
Just a little bit of a mind-fuck to go along with the objectification / humiliation.

So...Who's throwing this party?


And I will add a further spin of my own...after awhile of being used and only being able to hear their fellow fuckobjects, have a way of then opening up the sounds of the outer environment...but NOT everything.  Perhaps a voice-sensitive device that allows the objects to hear what is being said about them...e.g...."you've gotta come over here and fuck this bitch...her cunt is like wet, slick, tight velvet even after all the cock that's been here".
It adds to the objectification and to the humiliation aspect for them to not just experience the use and the sound of their fellow objects being used but to also hear the raw expression of their use and how.




SimplyMichael -> RE: Sexual objectification party (4/17/2008 8:58:44 AM)

And for a real mind fuck, either fire up a chainsaw, bring in a HUGE dog like a Mastiff, or have someone play the role of fuckhole and start just screaming about how this cock is too big for her ass.

Or, arrange three of them so each head is next to the other but at a slight angle so all three mouths are next to each other and can easily be fucked in turn, randomly moving from one to the other, that way it won't know when it will be  used but can hear and feel the other holes being used.




CreativeDominant -> RE: Sexual objectification party (4/17/2008 12:10:43 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SimplyMichael

And for a real mind fuck, either fire up a chainsaw, bring in a HUGE dog like a Mastiff, or have someone play the role of fuckhole and start just screaming about how this cock is too big for her ass.

Or, arrange three of them so each head is next to the other but at a slight angle so all three mouths are next to each other and can easily be fucked in turn, randomly moving from one to the other, that way it won't know when it will be  used but can hear and feel the other holes being used.


Niiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiice, Michael...I LIKE it...~wicked grin~





hejira92 -> RE: Sexual objectification party (4/17/2008 12:46:26 PM)

Oh, my. [fans self]
 
Has anyone noticed....[pant, pant]....it getting a bit.....[pant, pant]....warm in here?
 
[Goes off to contemplate in the corner......]




CreativeDominant -> RE: Sexual objectification party (4/17/2008 12:59:13 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant

quote:

ORIGINAL: SimplyMichael

And for a real mind fuck, either fire up a chainsaw, bring in a HUGE dog like a Mastiff, or have someone play the role of fuckhole and start just screaming about how this cock is too big for her ass.

Or, arrange three of them so each head is next to the other but at a slight angle so all three mouths are next to each other and can easily be fucked in turn, randomly moving from one to the other, that way it won't know when it will be  used but can hear and feel the other holes being used.


Niiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiice, Michael...I LIKE it...~wicked grin~



Of course, the one thing that would add to your specific idea Michael would be having them be able to hear the Mastiff too...especially if he has been for a run and is being teased a bit and the fucktoys think/wonder/worry about why he is panting and growling.




SubJordanTyler -> RE: Sexual objectification party (4/17/2008 4:01:56 PM)

These are some great ideas..........love them all!!




Leatherist -> RE: Sexual objectification party (4/17/2008 4:08:43 PM)

Not enough imagination here for a good mind fuck.

Anyone knows that if you are going to bring in a mastiff-you need to have a sound recording of him fucking a bitch during a breeding session,and then you play it BACK at the party-geez.
 
Details matter!




TaoInDominance -> RE: Sexual objectification party (4/17/2008 5:35:19 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Amadio

quote:

ORIGINAL: daddysliloneds

it's nothing more than a swingers party with whips and chains involved, so it's really no big deal if you're into that kind of stuff. one thing i found out seems to happen 9 out of 10 times when it comes to this type of activity, is that people crawl out from under garbage cans to attend it, so make sure the cover charge keeps the less than desireables away!


I think you're being cavalier. There's an element of submission involved in objectification you're overlooking; Much like JordanTyler said "Not really a sexual-turn on, but the feeling of just being an object........of just being there for someone to use in any way they liked..........was pretty powerful." 


I am not sure she is being cavalier.  She may have dismisses it as a "Swinger" event and thus been a little elitist but there is a concern. 

I happen to love objectification play in all forms and I see nothing wrong if consenting adults want to swing or fuck in any way.  I really liked Jordan Tylers statement, but there are many ways you can achieve that state.  I am not quite sure that a sexual objectification party neccessarily means fucking or that it is swing.  Sure it can and that is well and good. 

However, the comment about just a swingers party aside, daddysliloneds does ask a legitimate question one might ask in  a RACK assessment.  While you did start the topic this is a public forum and these tend to have a life of their own..  I know some  swingers venues, or  more on point BDSM venues that allow penatrative sex today require condoms for penetrative sex.  It is not a question of ethics or morality but of percieved  liability many times.  Also it is a matter of "community standards" unfriendly to kink that may have been codified into laws that pose legal liabilities.  In the bondage community there is a debate right now about the liability a suspension hard poiunt involves, and with or without a mat.  I even recall at the Black Rose thre was a rule about an open cut from a whip because of atomized blood product.

That said, many swingers parties do have those who practice unprotected sex.  Many will argue the risks are overstated.  I personally own stock in Trojan.




TaoInDominance -> RE: Sexual objectification party (4/17/2008 5:48:52 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SimplyMichael

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesFIP

quote:

ORIGINAL: Amadio

I imagine, much like the article, I'm going to put up a curtain for anonymity.  I will have limits posted for each participant, and quite a few DM's to monitor. 


The quite a few DM's is important as is their ability to call out quickly for help if somebody or three decide to ignore the rules posted by each body half.

I am curious if you allow oral how you are being objectified when people can see your face.

Plus I would suggest contacting your insurer to see how to protect yourself in case of lawsuits resulting from disease transmission.


What fucking bullshit!  Swingers do this stuff all the time and I haven't heard of them dying off.  I don't swing and could EASILY have the opportunity, it just isn't my thing but the holier than though bullshit in this thread is too much.


http://www.libchrist.com/std/RiskFactorsHetero.html
quote:


The fact that no transmission occurred among the 25 percent of couples who did not consistently use condoms shows that there is very low infectivity among heterosexual couples with one HIV-positive partner, according to the UCSF study. Infectivity increases greatly with injection drug use and the presence of an STD, as well as other factors such as risky sexual practices and lack of condom use.


http://www.avert.org/stdstatisticusa.htm

Now I am not advocating unprotected sex, lets just get real about the threat, if you aren't fucking IV drug users your risk of aids is very low and if you aren't fucking college kids, your risk of other STDs is also low.  Combine that with the effectiveness of condoms and VIOLA...you can have random sex if you aren't an idiot.


I see your point but not sure I agree entirely.  It probably depends om the venue.  The other issue is Vice.  You live in the Bay area if I recall correctly?  I am in San Diego and we hae serious issues with sexual contact in our area. I have actualyhad to majorly change what happens in a demo because Vice was sniffing around the venue and gave a warning.  What I could do at the Power Exchange or the Citadel is not what I could at Club X.  W have the San Diego Six to remind us of that.  Now I know some will say, those are wrong laws and must be challenges. Maybe I am a coward, but I have things to lose...so I would say to them...you first.

By the way, in this study quote:


The fact that no transmission occurred among the 25 percent of couples who did not consistently use condoms shows that there is very low infectivity among heterosexual couples with one HIV-positive partner, according to the UCSF study. Infectivity increases greatly with injection drug use and the presence of an STD, as well as other factors such as risky sexual practices and lack of condom use.

Were the people surveyed involved in multiple sex partner activities, such as in this thread (
the quote says with one HIV-positive partner)?  It says not-consistently using condoms...and a couple might be looking at things like T-cell counts and other monitoring.  This specidfically warns of risky sexual practices and the presence of an STD.




SimplyMichael -> RE: Sexual objectification party (4/17/2008 6:10:28 PM)

quote:

Maybe I am a coward, but I have things to lose...so I would say to them...you first


Actually, I have put my ass on the line for years.  I have been throwing BDSM events for almost as long as Club X has been around and owned a public dungeon for a long time as well. 

So, I paid very close attention to the Club X fiasco and am very familiar with the event.   Club X wasn't busted for doing BDSM in private.  They made the mistake of selling tickets to the general public rather than the correct way which is to sell only to members. 
For those who do know, despite their screw up, the San Diego Six got off although it did cost them a lot of money. 

This isn't just random speculation on my part.  As I said, I paid VERY close attention to the events, raised and donated money for their defence.  If you are interested in learning more about BDSM and the law, you should attend one of Master Rick's classes.

http://www.internationalmasterandslave2008.com/workshops.html

Rick gives some of the best legal classes on BDSM.




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875