Andjew
Posts: 39
Joined: 4/21/2008 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: GoddessDustyGold quote:
ORIGINAL: Andjew I fear that by following this protocol I am implying that Our relationship is not founded on duality and equality. The fundemental problem is that I do not understand the implication of decapitalizing my name. I capitalize Hers as a sign of respect, my logic is that doing the opposite implies disrespect. I have to admit that the bolded phrase above has Me confused. Perhaps I am misinterpreting it? D/s or M/s relationships are most definitely founded on duality. However, I do not feel, for Me, they are founded on equality. The inequality is the duality, and therin lies the thrill of it. It is what makes it not vanilla, or not mainstream. I am not one who drops into and out of roles. But some do as you can see from the responses on these threads. If you are My slave, you are My slave. You are not My equal friend sometimes with different relationship rules and My slave with protocols at other times. But that is just Me. Written assignments referring to yourself in a lower case and Her in an upper case simply serves to keep you in constant mind of that duality and how it plays out in your agreed upon relationship. It has nothing to do with disrespect. I am not a slave to Her. I am an equal in the sense that I am as nessacary to the relationship as She is. She certainly controls me and holds power over me, I've submitted myself to Her in that manner. I have not offered myself to Her as anything other than a submissive. She values my input in the relationship, and demands I research topics of interest, such as this one.
|