RavenMuse
Posts: 4030
Joined: 1/23/2006 Status: offline
|
My opinion is that this is one of those lables which, whilst most of us understand the concept, the lable itself doesn't quite fit. 'Forced'... If the action, whatever it is, falls within what has been consented to then it isn't 'forced'. Regardless of if the act is liked or not, wether it discusts them, humiliates then, whatever.... they trust the Dominant not to harm them and anything/everything within the remit of the consent is fair game, has been consented to and the Dominant has a 'right' to demand it unless the s type removes consent and walks away from the entire relationship. 'bisexuality'... Actions != equate to sexuality. Sexuality is what pushes your buttons sexualy and frankly that is just what it is, can't be demanded of anyone. It is just part of who they are. I can no more demand a change in My girls sexuality than I can demand a change in her actual height.... I can demand actions of her that are against her normal sexual prefrences but that doesn't change her suxuality. If a straight girl's consent extends into areas such as this and I deam that she wouldn't be 'harmed' by it (Emotionaly) then I can and maybe will demand sexual acts with another girl.... it wouldn't change the fact that she was straight, unless she discovered she WAS sexualy stimulated by the other girl rather than doing it as an act of submission, or getting of on 'humiliation' or.... whatever other aspects of the way I had set it up.
_____________________________
This above all: to thine own self be true, And it must follow, as the night the day, Thou canst not then be false to any man. Owner of metalmiss
|