Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Sadist vs Stalker -


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master >> RE: Sadist vs Stalker - Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Sadist vs Stalker - - 10/13/2005 10:25:11 AM   
direst


Posts: 3
Joined: 9/26/2005
Status: offline
Dont know how it is in America but I would say people like that aren't into bd/sm but have phycological problems. Most countries have laws against threatening behaviour and stalking however but there usefullness is very limited. The best thing is for her to move and change all contact details. If you have money there are agencies that specialise in this area, the other alternative is to find a nice decent domm somewhere else!!

(in reply to QuietMaster4u)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Sadist vs Stalker - - 10/13/2005 10:34:22 AM   
JustaTop


Posts: 511
Joined: 10/5/2005
Status: offline
She needs to take a self defense course,and learn how to own and operate a 9 mm.

Sad that our society forces us to these extremes,but if the police won't defend you-you must defend yourself.

Edited to add: And get her phone number changed,and unlisted,this will stop the harassing calls cold-and she can give the new number out to those who need it.

< Message edited by JustaTop -- 10/13/2005 10:47:17 AM >

(in reply to QuietMaster4u)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Sadist vs Stalker - - 10/13/2005 10:40:16 AM   
angelic


Posts: 1807
Joined: 1/24/2005
Status: offline
i agree with the self-defense course... i TOTALLY disagree with the 9mm. She can change her phone number or block incoming calls that are 'blocked' by dialing *77 (at least that's what it is here in Washington)

(in reply to JustaTop)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Sadist vs Stalker - - 10/13/2005 10:56:43 AM   
mystictryst


Posts: 125
Joined: 9/6/2005
Status: offline
Don't know if I can add anything but wanted to mention that a big dog is a good idea, in theory, however, most dogs take time and need to develope a bond with the person..

Furthermore, some phone companies can monitor incoming calls. I had it done once when I was receiving prank calls as a teen (from a former boyfriend), the phone company could monitor where the call was being placed from.

Additionally, when my best friend was being stalked by an ex, she was told to save any and all messages from him - and record any conversations she had. Perhaps she could get a recorder or use an older answer machine to record the phone calls. She can answer, if he speaks, she should tell him very matter of fact that she is no longer interested and that she wants him (them) to leave her alone. My friend got a "peace bond" against the fellow, not as regulated as a restraining order but it is easier to obtain.

And although the police cannot do anything until an attempt is made, they can give her tips/pointers on how to document the harrassment and ways to legally safeguard herself.

*edited for a typo*

< Message edited by mystictryst -- 10/13/2005 10:59:10 AM >

(in reply to angelic)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Sadist vs Stalker - - 10/13/2005 10:58:09 AM   
JustaTop


Posts: 511
Joined: 10/5/2005
Status: offline
And when he decides that not getting through on the phone means an in person appearance? And HE comes armed? What then?

(in reply to angelic)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Sadist vs Stalker - - 10/13/2005 11:15:58 AM   
FLButtSlut


Posts: 344
Joined: 3/17/2005
Status: offline
Ok, I have said this twice now on this post, but apparently, it either is not read, or not understood, so one more time.

In the UNITED STATES, nearly every state, including Oregon which this incident is occuring, have stalking laws. STALKING LAWS DO NOT REQUIRE PHYSICAL CONTACT TO TAKE PLACE BEFORE BEING ACTED UPON.

Typically, a restraining order requires an actual act of violence in order to be obtained, but stalking laws have changed this requirement. Further, while often the police MAY try to indicate that they are unable to do something, this IS NOT THE CASE. You don't even need a police officer for a restraining order, they can be obtained by going to the local courthouse.

candigirlll,

I understand you are a pain slut, but does that mean that you consent that during your play, you would LIKE to have as an end result the need to be hospitalized? Further, it would be very nice if everyone said what they meant and meant what they said, but this does not always happen. In reality, there is only one thing anyone needs to say...NO. Telling someone you are not interested and that you would like them to leave you alone is all it takes to turn the situation from a "nifty little fantasy game" into criminal activity if the communication continues.


(in reply to JustaTop)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Sadist vs Stalker - - 10/13/2005 11:30:35 AM   
angelic


Posts: 1807
Joined: 1/24/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JustaTop

And when he decides that not getting through on the phone means an in person appearance? And HE comes armed? What then?


a tire iron upside the head might change his mind.

(in reply to JustaTop)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Sadist vs Stalker - - 10/13/2005 11:33:42 AM   
angelic


Posts: 1807
Joined: 1/24/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: FLButtSlut

Ok, I have said this twice now on this post, but apparently, it either is not read, or not understood, so one more time.

In the UNITED STATES, nearly every state, including Oregon which this incident is occuring, have stalking laws. STALKING LAWS DO NOT REQUIRE PHYSICAL CONTACT TO TAKE PLACE BEFORE BEING ACTED UPON.

Typically, a restraining order requires an actual act of violence in order to be obtained, but stalking laws have changed this requirement. Further, while often the police MAY try to indicate that they are unable to do something, this IS NOT THE CASE. You don't even need a police officer for a restraining order, they can be obtained by going to the local courthouse.

candigirlll,

I understand you are a pain slut, but does that mean that you consent that during your play, you would LIKE to have as an end result the need to be hospitalized? Further, it would be very nice if everyone said what they meant and meant what they said, but this does not always happen. In reality, there is only one thing anyone needs to say...NO. Telling someone you are not interested and that you would like them to leave you alone is all it takes to turn the situation from a "nifty little fantasy game" into criminal activity if the communication continues.




i can only say how i believe restraining orders work here in Washington. a Motion for a Restraining Order is first filed... the other party MUST be served and they have a right to appear in court on the day of the hearing. Then the restraining order is put in place and typically it's a 10 day process. i'm not sure what the process is if the person cannot be served personally.

(in reply to FLButtSlut)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Sadist vs Stalker - - 10/13/2005 11:36:31 AM   
Quivver


Posts: 1953
Joined: 11/27/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JustaTop

And when he decides that not getting through on the phone means an in person appearance? And HE comes armed? What then?


There are self defence classes that will teach you how to take a gun from another
who is at a close distance and pointing it at you, it will differ depending on the type
of gun. Most domestic altercations when a Gun is involved are if memory serves
me correctly within 25 feet. Then again many will brandish without intent in an
attempt to scare. Others will shoot. The suggestion of her buying a Gun would
all depend on her mind set, could she use it? Could she get to it fast enough?
Would he just take it from her? Lots of what if's in my opinion. Although I am all
for Gun ownership they dont belong in the hands of everyone, but everyone
does need to know the basics.

Q




_____________________________

The problem with communication ... is the illusion that it has been accomplished. ~George Bernard Shaw

(in reply to JustaTop)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Sadist vs Stalker - - 10/13/2005 11:44:48 AM   
JustaTop


Posts: 511
Joined: 10/5/2005
Status: offline
That's true enough. I tend to forget I'm male in these matters, I guess.

I'd have very little compunction with ventilating someone who made me fear for my life. After all,as long as I survive,I can always sort out the legal stuff later-I'll be the one still breathing.

< Message edited by JustaTop -- 10/13/2005 11:46:57 AM >

(in reply to Quivver)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Sadist vs Stalker - - 10/13/2005 11:55:05 AM   
EmeraldSlave2


Posts: 3645
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline
My general outlook in life is to pick your battles and don't escalate unless necessary, because once something is escalated, it's hard to back it down.

I also prefer to try and keep things simple and calm unless necessary as well, instead of just reacting through fear and paranoia, take control and keep things as normal as they can be.

Real life stalking is a serious issue and it needs to be dealt with seriously. But it shouldn't be a knee-jerk paranoid issue or acting like some helpless victim.

(in reply to JustaTop)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Sadist vs Stalker - - 10/13/2005 1:00:11 PM   
FLButtSlut


Posts: 344
Joined: 3/17/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: angelic


quote:

ORIGINAL: FLButtSlut

Ok, I have said this twice now on this post, but apparently, it either is not read, or not understood, so one more time.

In the UNITED STATES, nearly every state, including Oregon which this incident is occuring, have stalking laws. STALKING LAWS DO NOT REQUIRE PHYSICAL CONTACT TO TAKE PLACE BEFORE BEING ACTED UPON.

Typically, a restraining order requires an actual act of violence in order to be obtained, but stalking laws have changed this requirement. Further, while often the police MAY try to indicate that they are unable to do something, this IS NOT THE CASE. You don't even need a police officer for a restraining order, they can be obtained by going to the local courthouse.

candigirlll,

I understand you are a pain slut, but does that mean that you consent that during your play, you would LIKE to have as an end result the need to be hospitalized? Further, it would be very nice if everyone said what they meant and meant what they said, but this does not always happen. In reality, there is only one thing anyone needs to say...NO. Telling someone you are not interested and that you would like them to leave you alone is all it takes to turn the situation from a "nifty little fantasy game" into criminal activity if the communication continues.




i can only say how i believe restraining orders work here in Washington. a Motion for a Restraining Order is first filed... the other party MUST be served and they have a right to appear in court on the day of the hearing. Then the restraining order is put in place and typically it's a 10 day process. i'm not sure what the process is if the person cannot be served personally.




The point, dear angelic, is that you are speaking about what "you believe" to be the case without having the legal knowledge or background of the laws and realities that surround it. I, on the other hand, am NOT speaking from that perspective.

There are several ways that restraining orders are done. Typically something called a TRO, or "temperory restraining order" is put in place IMMEDIATELY if you have proven that one is indeed necessary. Certainly the person it is against must be served, but that does not negate the restraining order's validity until that occurs, which is also typically done by police/sheriff's departments. Then, a court date is set approximately a week later to determine if a final or permanent restraining order is warranted.

With the new stalking laws, you don't need to wait until you have been physically attacked to take action, but there are other stipulations that must be met to qualify the "problem" as "stalking". A TRO can typically be obtained quite easily if you know what you are doing (or have someone who knows helping you) and not much more than your word is needed. The final order is where the actual proof will be required.

(in reply to angelic)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Sadist vs Stalker - - 10/13/2005 1:02:43 PM   
angelic


Posts: 1807
Joined: 1/24/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: FLButtSlut


quote:

ORIGINAL: angelic


quote:

ORIGINAL: FLButtSlut

Ok, I have said this twice now on this post, but apparently, it either is not read, or not understood, so one more time.

In the UNITED STATES, nearly every state, including Oregon which this incident is occuring, have stalking laws. STALKING LAWS DO NOT REQUIRE PHYSICAL CONTACT TO TAKE PLACE BEFORE BEING ACTED UPON.

Typically, a restraining order requires an actual act of violence in order to be obtained, but stalking laws have changed this requirement. Further, while often the police MAY try to indicate that they are unable to do something, this IS NOT THE CASE. You don't even need a police officer for a restraining order, they can be obtained by going to the local courthouse.

candigirlll,

I understand you are a pain slut, but does that mean that you consent that during your play, you would LIKE to have as an end result the need to be hospitalized? Further, it would be very nice if everyone said what they meant and meant what they said, but this does not always happen. In reality, there is only one thing anyone needs to say...NO. Telling someone you are not interested and that you would like them to leave you alone is all it takes to turn the situation from a "nifty little fantasy game" into criminal activity if the communication continues.




i can only say how i believe restraining orders work here in Washington. a Motion for a Restraining Order is first filed... the other party MUST be served and they have a right to appear in court on the day of the hearing. Then the restraining order is put in place and typically it's a 10 day process. i'm not sure what the process is if the person cannot be served personally.




The point, dear angelic, is that you are speaking about what "you believe" to be the case without having the legal knowledge or background of the laws and realities that surround it. I, on the other hand, am NOT speaking from that perspective.

There are several ways that restraining orders are done. Typically something called a TRO, or "temperory restraining order" is put in place IMMEDIATELY if you have proven that one is indeed necessary. Certainly the person it is against must be served, but that does not negate the restraining order's validity until that occurs, which is also typically done by police/sheriff's departments. Then, a court date is set approximately a week later to determine if a final or permanent restraining order is warranted.

With the new stalking laws, you don't need to wait until you have been physically attacked to take action, but there are other stipulations that must be met to qualify the "problem" as "stalking". A TRO can typically be obtained quite easily if you know what you are doing (or have someone who knows helping you) and not much more than your word is needed. The final order is where the actual proof will be required.


exactly why i said 'i believe'... thank you for the education.

(in reply to FLButtSlut)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Sadist vs Stalker - - 10/13/2005 2:18:18 PM   
candigirlll


Posts: 32
Joined: 4/22/2005
Status: offline
no not at all... but like i said... i am just wondering if this girl to impress him had said she liked this that or the other and now he is acting on it and she is playing victim.. i have seen this done many times... i do beleive that a female is able to say no at anytime... but if you teach a dog to leave the fish but he can eat all the chicken he wants... and you feed him chicken for months... and then one day you have YOU'RE chicken sitting on a plate and the dog eats it lmao.. you cant hardley put all the blame on the dog can you?
quote:

ORIGINAL: FLButtSlut

Ok, I have said this twice now on this post, but apparently, it either is not read, or not understood, so one more time.

In the UNITED STATES, nearly every state, including Oregon which this incident is occuring, have stalking laws. STALKING LAWS DO NOT REQUIRE PHYSICAL CONTACT TO TAKE PLACE BEFORE BEING ACTED UPON.

Typically, a restraining order requires an actual act of violence in order to be obtained, but stalking laws have changed this requirement. Further, while often the police MAY try to indicate that they are unable to do something, this IS NOT THE CASE. You don't even need a police officer for a restraining order, they can be obtained by going to the local courthouse.

candigirlll,

I understand you are a pain slut, but does that mean that you consent that during your play, you would LIKE to have as an end result the need to be hospitalized? Further, it would be very nice if everyone said what they meant and meant what they said, but this does not always happen. In reality, there is only one thing anyone needs to say...NO. Telling someone you are not interested and that you would like them to leave you alone is all it takes to turn the situation from a "nifty little fantasy game" into criminal activity if the communication continues.




(in reply to FLButtSlut)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Sadist vs Stalker - - 10/13/2005 2:34:03 PM   
candigirlll


Posts: 32
Joined: 4/22/2005
Status: offline
and really if the problem is that serious all the talk of a restraining order is really worthless... my g/f is sitting here reading this with me.. he hubby had a restraining order... but see you cant just call and say he is ther and they will pick him up they have to catch him there.. so she called three or 4 times but he was always gone when the cops got there... so they could do nothing.. he came back one night and broke in her house it was kinda poetic justice he tripped on one of the kids toys and shot himself in the throat.. he does live... but he came to kill her.. so that restraining order did not do her a bit of good and i think if someone truely wants to get to that girl he will...
quote:

ORIGINAL: Quivverrestraining orders


quote:

ORIGINAL: JustaTop

And when he decides that not getting through on the phone means an in person appearance? And HE comes armed? What then?


There are self defence classes that will teach you how to take a gun from another
who is at a close distance and pointing it at you, it will differ depending on the type
of gun. Most domestic altercations when a Gun is involved are if memory serves
me correctly within 25 feet. Then again many will brandish without intent in an
attempt to scare. Others will shoot. The suggestion of her buying a Gun would
all depend on her mind set, could she use it? Could she get to it fast enough?
Would he just take it from her? Lots of what if's in my opinion. Although I am all
for Gun ownership they dont belong in the hands of everyone, but everyone
does need to know the basics.

Q




quote:

restraining orders

(in reply to Quivver)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Sadist vs Stalker - - 10/13/2005 4:05:12 PM   
krys


Posts: 611
Joined: 8/24/2005
Status: offline
Please keep in mind that, in some states, recording a conversation with someone without their knowledge is a crime.

If someone can block their incoming caller ID, chances are your phone company can also instruct you how to automatically reject those incoming calls. Its usually called Anonymous Call Rejection. I dont know what provider she uses, but try COT.net if you use Cal-Ore.

_____________________________

Krys

(in reply to candigirlll)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Sadist vs Stalker - - 10/13/2005 5:39:52 PM   
JustaTop


Posts: 511
Joined: 10/5/2005
Status: offline
quote:

and really if the problem is that serious all the talk of a restraining order is really worthless... my g/f is sitting here reading this with me.. he hubby had a restraining order... but see you cant just call and say he is ther and they will pick him up they have to catch him there.. so she called three or 4 times but he was always gone when the cops got there... so they could do nothing.. he came back one night and broke in her house it was kinda poetic justice he tripped on one of the kids toys and shot himself in the throat.. he does live... but he came to kill her.. so that restraining order did not do her a bit of good and i think if someone truely wants to get to that girl he will...


Which is why I suggested getting a gun,and learning to use it. It's one of the few really effective equalizers that make women entirely equal to men, physically.

(in reply to candigirlll)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Sadist vs Stalker - - 10/13/2005 7:33:41 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Consider the biggest room in your house........a full basement?

shall we say 30 feet? Conventional wisdom says if you can get a gun under much duress at that distance in six shots you cant hit the motherfucker.....so the best defense in a gun at that range is a 45 or 357. if you blow the doorframe off, you will make anyone in that direction lay down hit or not... a hole the size of a garbage can next to you concentrates a mind wonderfully..........

Now, heres the news...........

Do you wanna kill someone? Will you?


If not..........dont do it.

cause I will rip it outta your hands and beat you with it and a K frame 357 is alot heavier than a belt.

Think about it you got time........

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to JustaTop)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Sadist vs Stalker - - 10/13/2005 8:08:50 PM   
JustaTop


Posts: 511
Joined: 10/5/2005
Status: offline
There's been considerable debate on whether a 9mm is more effective than a 45 at stopping power. But someone who can't handle the kick from a large bore handgun can do every bit as well with an auto loading, 16 gage shotgun.

I guarantee that if you have it loaded with 00 buck and choke it down-it'll get the point across. And it's a lot easier to hold onto. And let me put it this way-someobody gives me just cause- and I think the world can be improved with thier removal-no worries here. Nor guilt.

< Message edited by JustaTop -- 10/13/2005 9:43:03 PM >

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Sadist vs Stalker - - 10/14/2005 12:42:06 AM   
QuietMaster4u


Posts: 49
Joined: 7/3/2005
Status: offline
I did the hardest thing tonight that any friend could do, for another. Forget about their pleadings not to involve the police, because of the unwanted attention.

No, the hardest thing I had to do tonight was sit with a patrol deputy and explain collars and bdsm to him. As he had never heard of it before. I put it out there for him, and he couldn't believe what he was hearing. Then he asked me how many people were involved with bdsm.

But I'm drifting off topic here...

I got home from work, and turned on the computer to find an offline msg from the stalker. He "claimed" (I'm using this term because I can not prove this) he would kidnap and rape my friend tomorrow. So I spent the entire evening talking to him trying to get this resolved. Trying to convince him to leave her alone. It didn't work... In the end, all it did was make matters worse. I finally got him to talk about the encounter with another girl, she wasn't a slave. Just somebody they took off the street in some town. They brutally attacked her and tied her down and gagged her. Once there got to be too much blood, they dropped her a mile from a local hospital. I refuse to go into the detail of this, because of the nature of this crime. This is happened a long time ago by his account.

The deputy, also informed me. Regardless, of what we are reading online. They can not issue a Restraining / Stalking Order without a full name and location.

I put it to him simply, prove to me that these are just kids playing an elobrate hoax. Otherwise, arrest me now for making a false report. I asked him if he could look for crimes that involved specific techniques and are probably currently unsolved. He said he could (I knew he could, but the question was would he). My friend wants this resolved quietly and just to make it disappear.
If this is a hoax, then I am the fool. And I will stand up in the center of town and say so much. But I can not believe this to be true, so I must press forward with what I believe.

Yes it is dangerous to involve local law enforcement, because they do not understand what it is that we are doing. It is easy and simple for them to see us as the bad guys and not the crime we are trying to prevent. But I did not hide the conversations. And I was honest and straight forward with him. I can do nothing more, I have to wait and see what becomes of what has been put into motion.

I have said my peace, tomorrow is the day for all of this to come to a head. Or just go away... quietly, never to be heard of again... until the next scene is revealed.

Sitting humbled in peace - Wolf

(in reply to JustaTop)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master >> RE: Sadist vs Stalker - Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.093