Celeres
Posts: 166
Joined: 3/9/2008 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: ender66 contracts aren't bad, they're just a way to reinforce that the sub is the sub and the Dom is the Dom. It makes consensual submission more official, and binding I'm afraid I have to agree partly to the minority in this thread. First off, this is the first post that I am responding to, so please, bear with me. Firstly, I think that "contracts" is just a lack for a better term. I for one enjoy them as it is more of a symbol, than a legally-binding document. Take Christianity for example, the Bible doesn't make people who go to church "legally" responsible, rather it is more of a symbol, a set of "guidelines" (as you will) that give some credence to the relationship. Granted, there is a chance of infidelity in any relationship, vanilla or otherwise. A contract, to me anyway, (in my limited experience to the lifestyle), offers a better understanding of what it may entail, being in a “committed” D/s relationship. To me, contracts are mainly for people new to the lifestyle—to jumpstart a D/s relationship while casting away most/all false preconceptions of what’s shown on TV or in porn. The rest, is a matter of faith and trust: trust that the Dom/Domme can recognize when they should let the submissive go if things aren’t working out. Subbies get a veto vote and an opinion too! Anyway... those are my two cents! --Celeres
< Message edited by Celeres -- 4/23/2008 7:16:13 PM >
|