darchChylde
Posts: 5279
Joined: 9/28/2006 From: Warm Springs, GA but i live in San Francisco. Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Sanity Horses can clearly carry a load. The alternative might well be to allow them to go extinct. Would that be better somehow? Should we kill all domestic animals to keep them safe from all possible harm? In the wild when a horse breaks a leg it suffers a long agonizing death. Here, its loving owners euthanize the animal. I think fishing is more cruel, should we ban that too? Yes, a horse can carry a load, but you don't hear about them doing so in the wild. And even work-horses are far much more humanely tended than their racer counterparts. Horses are not domestic animals, they are domesticated; there's a huge distinction. Horse, unlike most domestic breeds of dogs; are completely capable of surviving and thriving in the wild without human interference. In the wild a horse breaks it's leg and it dies as nature dictates; generally not in a long agonizing manner because predators will fall upon the beast and bring it's death with some speed.... but still, it's the natural cycle. Now fishing on the other hand, is usually important for population control to save the local microcosm of flora/fauna. Also, it is usually for practical purposes (more people eat fish than wittingly eat horse) and not for sport. It's not about protecting animals from harm, but about harming and mistreating them needlessly. Everything dies in nature, why should we abuse those creatures we take from their natural environments just for our own amusement and greed? Try a logical argument next time.
_____________________________
I'm the man your mother warned you about... if only to keep me to herself. I'm a male dominant switch whose experienced as a poly sub to a dominant woman . Where the fuck do I post? Proud Owner and Protector of chyldeschylde.
|