clevername2
Posts: 16
Joined: 5/8/2008 Status: offline
|
I'll pull out the main point of my question to make it easier to see. What I like is being free from the conscious, intellectual, deliberate thoughts that compose the dominant state of mind. To be dominant is to be thinking of what is happening and how it should go. The mind is busy keeping track of what happens, directing it to be a certain way. Ego is foremost. Lust is controlled, kept in check, regulated and inhibited. Being submissive is to shut down that controlling mindfulness, to experience directly and freely whatever sensations come next. It allows lust to run full bore, passion to feed on itself and the senses to expand to their limits. In a submissive state I am enjoying a sensual feast as a lusty glutton of pleasure. Submission is freedom to enjoy feelings, sensations and emotions. Domination seems to me like the opposite, the intellect being in charge, no fun at all, no freedom to enjoy, and with feelings being held in check and stifled. It seems like submission lets the rest of the mind and all of the body play, while domination only lets the one small part of the ego take some kind of pleasure in weilding power. To me it looks like the difference between enjoying a buffet and nibbling on a stale cracker. I understand that dominants like to dominate. I don't care what the grand metaphysical source of it might be. I just wondered what is on the list of the things that make up the enjoyment of it. What's in it for a submissive: 1. freedom from mindfulness 2. immediate and spontaneous sensation 3. being surprised; discovering new things; expanding limits 4. transcendance of self, time and place 5. primitive satisfaction What I imagine is in it for a dominant: 1. Being the boss 2. Knowing what will happen 3. ? 4. ? 5. ? Is it any FUN? Or is the reward had in a psychological sense, of liking to be powerful and in control? I sometimes think that submissive people are those who figured out that by handing over the chores of managing a scene to dominants, they are free to enjoy play. And for dominants who eagerly accept that role, it somehow satisfies a need for the ego to be proud of itself or to imagine respect or to avoid chaos. Because surely it is in freedom and chaos and spontaneity that joy flourishes, while in the prison of an orderly ego pleasure is sacrificed for security and reassurances.
< Message edited by clevername2 -- 5/9/2008 10:38:31 AM >
|