TreasureKY
Posts: 3032
Joined: 4/10/2007 From: Kentucky Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Moonchild66 Wow, I had no idea so many were so sceptical of starting relationships online. Not what I expected here, on an online message board. I do understand your distress at the negativity you've received on this point, however, I'd say that the key idea you aren't getting with these responses is that while most here accept that you can meet someone online with whom you can develop a successful relationship, few will agree that it is wise to commit to that relationship before you've had a chance to meet and spend time with each other in person. Even fewer accept the idea that you can form any type of functioning online D/s relationship without ever having met in person... especially one that involves "training" or the so-called "training collar". As for your original post... quote:
ORIGINAL: Moonchild66 While we had discussed Him sharing me in real life if I accepted His collar, we had both agreed that we would not be with another sexually until we were able to meet in person. Okay, you say that you discussed him sharing you... but did you have in your mind that you would also be sharing him? Did you expect that if and when you became sexually involved with others that it would be under circumstances that you were aware of and consented to beforehand? Was this dominant specific with you in that he expected to be free to have sexual activity with whomever he wished, whenever he wished, without your knowledge or consent? When you discussed not being with another sexually until you met, did you clarify with each other what was specifically meant by that... defining exactly what sexual contact was being abstained from? My point in asking these questions is to get you to think about exactly how well you communicated your wants and desires. You say that his actions were, to you, a betrayal of your trust and the agreement you had between you, but just how careful were you in building that trust and in coming to that agreement? It doesn't sound as if he agrees with you. quote:
ORIGINAL: Moonchild66 He felt that, as a sub, I should "get over it" and wasn't willing to admit he had done anything wrong. ... He feels that as a Dom, admitting any wrong-doing to me, a sub, would be beneath Him. While I would not accept this reasoning, I would have made this clear before I ever entered into a power-exchange relationship. Did you? quote:
ORIGINAL: Moonchild66 I refused to just "get over it", so he released me, but has given me tonight to think about it. Hmm... this, all by itself, is reason enough for me to walk away, provided that I somehow lost my senses and became involved with this dominant in the first place. Who needs a dominant that is wishy-washy? quote:
ORIGINAL: Moonchild66 ... i'm asking for input from understanding Doms. Understand yourself and what you want, first. Then, find someone who makes sense to you. When that happens, you don't need to struggle to understand them. quote:
ORIGINAL: Moonchild66 ... is it out of line for a sub to expect a Dom to be willing to admit when he is wrong? Who cares what anyone else thinks is out of line for a sub? Question is, do you think it's out of line to expect anyone to admit to you when they are wrong? If not, then find a partner who agrees with you.
|