WinsomeDefiance
Posts: 6719
Joined: 8/7/2007 Status: offline
|
I dont' know for certain, but it seems to me as if the problem with the BDSM verbiage isn't whether or not the titles are misnomers, but that people tend to project their own opinions onto others - regardless of whether or not that other person has clearly defined who they are by their own standards. Yes, I will be the first to acknowledge that I'm a lousy example to use to illustrate what I'm trying to convey- but well, here goes: I've been told I wasn't submissive at all, by those with whom I wasn't submissively inclined. I've been told I'm vanilla by well...every single person in the Gorean house I once lived in. No surprise there hehe. I"ve been told I'm a slave at heart, by someone who wanted me to be a slave. I've been told I was a Dominant, by someone who wanted me to be Dominant, despite my never having made any claims of BEING Dominant. At best, I'll claim to be Top'ish, when the chemistry is right. All in all, I just shake my head and smile. Sometimes I just exhale heavily, and try not to burst into tears. In retrospect, I'm probably the least knowledgeable person to post their thoughts in this particular thread. However, because I find it hard to really define the complexity that is "me" within a BDSM context, I try to avoid laying claim to being submissive at all even when deep down, I want to BE exactly that. My dad used to say, if wishes were fishes - we'd all have fins and wish ourselves into fishy skins.." It doesn't seem very fair that who I am capable of being relies so heavily on the yen to my yang (or is it yang to my yen?). It implies I have no sense of individuality away from others, and that is completely as far from the truth as it gets. I just know that it takes a particular chemistry and connection to inspire within me all that I want and need to be, and until that happens I'm content to be just good 'ole Winsome, thank you very much. Misnomers, verbiage, labels and projections aside. W
|