Domin8tingUrDrmz
Posts: 1269
Joined: 4/8/2006 From: Portland Metro, Oregon Status: offline
|
Personally, I find such monikers annoying. To me, they indicate a 'one-trick pony', where all they want is to be humiliated and degraded; or worse yet, they truly belive they are worthless. I do not want a worthless person in my life. I do not have the energy necessary to either a) constantly degrade them and find them fun to be around, or b) constantly attempting to boost their ego so they feel adequate enough to kiss the ground I walk upon. Blech! I imagine some people who are insecure themselves may find this an attractive quality because it allows them to boost their own egos by degrading others. I imagine others still enjoy this type of 'play' in certain contexts but not an all the time thing. I'm quite sure there is someone out there for everyone - finding them can be the tricky part. I enjoy individuals who are content in who they are and are confident in themselves. A confident submissive, one who submits because they are comfortable doing such, is far more attractive to me than a person who submits because they feel unworthy of being loved (or liked, or respected, etc.). A name such as 'worthlesspig' would initially cause me an instant lack of interest in them. However, if they wrote to me in a manner that was not self-degrading, not full of 'will you treat me like the worthless pig I am' requests, and if it was revealed that they somehow thought this was the only way to attract a dominant but don't actually have low-self esteem, I'd continue to talk with them. Sadly, I haven't had that occur yet from people with similar names.
_____________________________
4 out of 3 people have trouble with fractions. Ask a Mistress Forum FAQ Profile Help
|