|
UPSG -> RE: heterosexual males sucking cock (1/25/2009 11:31:04 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Imakemensquirm
I've known many submissive males over the years and I am certain that a heterosexual male would never suck a real cock, nor would he knowingly allow his cock to be sucked by another male. I don't feel this makes him any less submissive, it just happens to be his hard wiring. I'm sure there are many males who are trying to come to terms with having sucked a cock, but this is just a matter of them finding their way out of that closet. I'm not making a judgement call here, I'm just saying that you are who you are.
That's all subjective and anecdotal. Most heterosexual males will never suck a cock (most will never commit murder either) but "never" can be a big word, especially if someone is strung out on heroin or crack. Most heterosexual males frequently talk about what they would do to another guy (violence wise) but when you see many of them enter a boxing ring it's not uncommon to see a good portion of them begin to cower and retreat.
It might be worth noting that most heterosexual men would never become a submissive anything, within the fetish of BDSM, to a woman, even if his hard limit was same sex activity. You think John Gotti or any "Man of Honor" as La Cosa Nostra member refer to themselves, would play butler servant to a woman in spiked boots? I doubt not. Most men in prison might consider raping a heterosexual man if they ever found out he did that.
What constitutes heterosexuality (I'm not talking about heterosexual sex) is a subjective matter. The hard-line idea of differentiating homosexual from heterosexual never existed in fuedal Japan as I understand it. That concept certainly never existed among certain cheifdom or tribal level Amerindian society. And while the U.S. Navy was officially against homosexual activity in the 1800's (in the English navy you could be put to death) it's interesting to note the U.S. Navy in the 1800's was reputedly a Gomarrah of male-on-male sexual activity (including sugar daddies) while out at sea. There was even white and black males having sex with one another (interesting because a Black man would have been lynched at that time for laying hands on a White woman). This is all known from written sources such as records and diary accounts (assuming they are accurate of course). The U.S. Navy was bad with male-on-male sodomy and oral sex in the 1800's that it was reputedly hard for a heterosexual male not to enter the Navy and not exist without ever having had some form of sexual relations with another man.
While it is still very difficult for male homosexuals today in the U.S., it is not as difficult for them, in my judgement at least, as it was in the 1800's. Perhaps I'm wrong but I don't think so. So, having said that, most young men do not need to hide in the "closet" as President Abraham Lincoln might have.
What people are having issue with is the right of other people to self describe.
|
|
|
|
