|
UPSG -> RE: heterosexual males sucking cock (1/23/2009 12:12:46 AM)
|
I think many heterosexual men with the fetish of submission, of forced fem and such, are more aroused and mentally charged up about the idea of humiliation. Now, what causes that, the roots, is beyond my learning, and I'll let that rest as another thread. The fact is we humans can be many things, we build complex lives and have more than one area of development in us socially and psychologically. Whether or not a man is heterosexual is irrelevant from this stand point as I see it, if a man requests, obtains, ownership by a dominate woman, assuming all those obligations toward social and psychological development under her charge that befits a sexual ad mental slave, once he kneels to her commands and sucks a cock hung in his face, he is objectively an obedient cock sucker. The property of the one who owns him.
A man with this inclined fetish will find such control and humiliation arousing. Being homosexual has nothing to do with it. A gay man that marries a woman and produces several children with her can still orgasm (indeed arouse himself to erection) inside her hot, tight, wet pussy. Because pussy feels good, and also because he may use other mental fetish arousal to help stimulate his erection toward orgasm. What the hell does bringing a mistress a glass of water upon her order have to do with a male slave being heterosexual? Nada. The one that really likes humiliation and brought to their knees servitude, in the most deepest and degrading ways, will get a long well with being kicked in the ass, crawling on all fours, and following through with being ordered to suck three or four cocks to completion.
Is it humiliating if you come to enjoy it or become not only well skilled at it but perhaps even better than most women at performing it? Yes it is. Because objectively speaking the man lives in disgrace. When he is called a bitch, ass naked and lead around on a leash in a party full of men and women who would never stoop to such treatment, assumed identity, of fulfill the disgraced tasks he's given and performs, he is in fact humiliated, and if not then than afterward. Would he want his situation or life as such, filmed and put on CNN for the world to see? Hell no.
I assume the more conditioned, the more brought down, the more mentally enslaved the submissive heterosexual male is, the more developed overtime he becomes to being obedient to his Mistress in public. She could probably put him in a dress and pimp on a leash under a bridge.
Being conditioned like that requires a sub to trust his Mistress I would assume, that develops over time I also assume, and is surely helped crafted by the dominate. I would think it also requires a relentless will to condition that male through the processes of degrading him and humiliating him - or rather making him humiliate himself. After one act after another, month after month, where can a man like that go but back into the metaphorical protective arms of his Mistress? He can't obtain a wife with those credentials. If any men in the outer world ever found out that would be hell for him. He certainly should not give birth to any children if he is actively living that way (that's too much shame brought upon an innocent child). Vasectomy, absolute servitude, and shame is his lot and rest of his fulfillment as an identity. Knowing he stooped time after time obediently to another low, he will obediently respond to and fulfill everyone of his future commands. (minus moral lines he may wish death before crossing e.g. ordered murder, worship of pagan gods etc.)
Eh... or maybe it doesn't work that way at all. But that was just some of my views into the insight of the mind. I could be totally wrong.
|
|
|
|
