Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: The biggest human fallacy “I’ve got rights”


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: The biggest human fallacy “I’ve got rights” Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: The biggest human fallacy “I’ve got rights” - 6/11/2008 1:34:39 PM   
philosophy


Posts: 5284
Joined: 2/15/2004
Status: offline
....yup, that word 'entitled' has got itself into a bit of trouble in modern times. One meaning is ethical, the other not. Problem with this particular discussion is that both meanings can be applicable, so the word itself can get in the way of communication. Mind you, the semantics of this discussion are problematic anyway......the word 'right' itself has a wealth of shades of meaning that can result in, say, you and i arguing over two different things, both called a 'right'.
The word itself also discriminates against us south-paws......

(in reply to cpK69)
Profile   Post #: 81
RE: The biggest human fallacy “I’ve got rights” - 6/11/2008 1:39:36 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Hey politesub no problem ...we have for the most part forgiven you guys for Mad King George's Tyranny...no problem at all except for that one little colonialist remark which in the spirit of better relations with our English "cousins' I hereby forgive...Mike


At least i didnt say Rebels

(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 82
RE: The biggest human fallacy “I’ve got rights” - 6/11/2008 1:53:49 PM   
wanderingstray


Posts: 26
Joined: 6/11/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: cpK69

A recent thread caused me to consider this idea closer. I have abilities, and opportunities; but rights? I don’t think so.
 
Not to life, liberty, or the pursuit of happiness.
 
None of these things have just been handed to me. If they were rights they should be, and without consequence.
 
I have to work for these things, and only get to keep them, if I am responsible toward them. Even then, there’s no guarantee.
 
Do you have rights?


You're misunderstanding the basic idea. A right is not a condition of absolute enjoyment. It is the just disposition of some quality of existence within the framework of reasonable justice. To declare that one and all have certain god-given rights, or rights that are not subject to the laws of man, is to say that existence itself grants those rights which it requires. Being alive I claim that my life is just and then so are my claims to what make life possible. This is the basis of free society because it represents what we all have in common and what must be protected for us to live. The idea is that only when we grant to everyone the right to exist do we escape life being merely the endless struggle against tyrannies. Instead of these people ruling those people by virtue of a claim of divine right to do so, as had been the case, it is declared that each person has an equal and basic right to live, none being appointed by god as lord over the rest. Recognition of human rights matters within the conceptual framework of government. The idea is that we all do have rights. These must be respected. Their infringement must be justified only in the context of free society overall, and not just by force of arms.

< Message edited by wanderingstray -- 6/11/2008 1:54:44 PM >

(in reply to cpK69)
Profile   Post #: 83
RE: The biggest human fallacy “I’ve got rights” - 6/11/2008 1:55:23 PM   
kittinSol


Posts: 16926
Status: offline
Pure brilliance.

_____________________________



(in reply to wanderingstray)
Profile   Post #: 84
RE: The biggest human fallacy “I’ve got rights” - 6/11/2008 2:42:33 PM   
BitaTruble


Posts: 9779
Joined: 1/12/2006
From: Texas
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: wanderingstray

You're misunderstanding the basic idea. A right is not a condition of absolute enjoyment. It is the just disposition of some quality of existence within the framework of reasonable justice. To declare that one and all have certain god-given rights, or rights that are not subject to the laws of man, is to say that existence itself grants those rights which it requires. Being alive I claim that my life is just and then so are my claims to what make life possible. This is the basis of free society because it represents what we all have in common and what must be protected for us to live. The idea is that only when we grant to everyone the right to exist do we escape life being merely the endless struggle against tyrannies. Instead of these people ruling those people by virtue of a claim of divine right to do so, as had been the case, it is declared that each person has an equal and basic right to live, none being appointed by god as lord over the rest. Recognition of human rights matters within the conceptual framework of government. The idea is that we all do have rights. These must be respected. Their infringement must be justified only in the context of free society overall, and not just by force of arms.


Thomas Paine makes an amazing argument against the Divine right of Kings using the bible as his source in the Common Sense pamphlets. It's in the OF MONARCHY AND HEREDITARY SUCCESSION section. If you haven't read it, I highly recommend it!

_____________________________

"Oh, so it's just like
Rock, paper, scissors."

He laughed. "You are the wisest woman I know."


(in reply to wanderingstray)
Profile   Post #: 85
RE: The biggest human fallacy “I’ve got rights” - 6/11/2008 2:48:44 PM   
NorthernGent


Posts: 8730
Joined: 7/10/2006
Status: offline
As do Thomas Hobbes and John Locke.

_____________________________

I have the courage to be a coward - but not beyond my limits.

Sooner or later, the man who wins is the man who thinks he can.

(in reply to BitaTruble)
Profile   Post #: 86
RE: The biggest human fallacy “I’ve got rights” - 6/11/2008 2:59:19 PM   
popeye1250


Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

Mike, yes i am suggesting exactly that. I am not trying to take anything away from the bravery of the Patriots here either. The influence France had was enormous, right from the initial supply of weapons and finances, through to the use of troops and naval power. I forget which battle, maybe Yorktown, their were more French troops taking part than Colonialists. I also doubt the outcome would have been the same without the French Naval blockade, which effectively cut Cornwallis off. The fact is France had their own agenda, which was to tie up British forces and naval power, as we fought around the globe.

The irony of all this was the fall of the French Empire, the revoloution in France was largely a part of France being bankrupted by the war in the USA. Even more ironic was the renaming of French fries to freedom fries, given the connections.

This all returns to my original reply to Popeye, without outside help, oppressed peoples normally dont have the military might to overthrow their dictators, King George included.


Politesub, that's pretty weak.
Remember the Jews in the ghettos in Warsaw, Poland?
They'd kill one or two Germans and grab their guns and ammo.
Then that would give them more power to kill more Germans and grab their ammo too.
Pretty soon they had 300 Jews with guns and ammo!
And if each one of those Jews can kill 3 Germans each they've got 1,200 Jews with guns and ammo.
Plus, they've got sabotage on their side as well.
It can "mushroom" real fast.
They gave the Germans an awful beating.


_____________________________

"But Your Honor, this is not a Jury of my Peers, these people are all decent, honest, law-abiding citizens!"

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 87
RE: The biggest human fallacy “I’ve got rights” - 6/11/2008 3:22:29 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline
Bita i might be repeating myself here but didn't Paine go a bit around the bend at the end....not in the least taking away from his early brilliance...his pamphlets during the dark days of the revolution might have saved the day...

(in reply to NorthernGent)
Profile   Post #: 88
RE: The biggest human fallacy “I’ve got rights” - 6/11/2008 3:24:27 PM   
NorthernGent


Posts: 8730
Joined: 7/10/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: philosophy

Rights are the essential liberties that no other person, organisation or government have any authority to take away from you.



At first light, it's an impressive statement.

But.......

From whom have these rights been granted? 

Perhaps the concept of rights is an abstract, human construct, which can be, and are, removed in certain circumstances; which suggests they aren't rights at all. Perhaps we need this human construct to co-exist.

_____________________________

I have the courage to be a coward - but not beyond my limits.

Sooner or later, the man who wins is the man who thinks he can.

(in reply to philosophy)
Profile   Post #: 89
RE: The biggest human fallacy “I’ve got rights” - 6/11/2008 4:17:51 PM   
popeye1250


Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: NorthernGent

quote:

ORIGINAL: philosophy

Rights are the essential liberties that no other person, organisation or government have any authority to take away from you.



At first light, it's an impressive statement.

But.......

From whom have these rights been granted? 

Perhaps the concept of rights is an abstract, human construct, which can be, and are, removed in certain circumstances; which suggests they aren't rights at all. Perhaps we need this human construct to co-exist.


NG, the founding fathers of this country said that those rights came from God.
You can't fuck with that now can you?

< Message edited by popeye1250 -- 6/11/2008 4:20:27 PM >


_____________________________

"But Your Honor, this is not a Jury of my Peers, these people are all decent, honest, law-abiding citizens!"

(in reply to NorthernGent)
Profile   Post #: 90
RE: The biggest human fallacy “I’ve got rights” - 6/11/2008 4:56:27 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250


Politesub, that's pretty weak.
Remember the Jews in the ghettos in Warsaw, Poland?
They'd kill one or two Germans and grab their guns and ammo.
Then that would give them more power to kill more Germans and grab their ammo too.
Pretty soon they had 300 Jews with guns and ammo!
And if each one of those Jews can kill 3 Germans each they've got 1,200 Jews with guns and ammo.
Plus, they've got sabotage on their side as well.
It can "mushroom" real fast.
They gave the Germans an awful beating.



Popeye, far from my argument being pretty weak, your reply proves my point. There were two upsrisings in Warsaw, the first one, in the Jewish ghetto, ended with just 16 Germans killed, and almost all those living in the ghetto also killed. The second, by the Polish underground army, was assisted by arms drops flown from the UK, as well as local tool shops producing weapons. It was this one that was more successful. Although the Germans were victorious in the end, they suffered over 25,000 casualties, partly but not wholly due to continuous air supply drops to the Polish forces.


(in reply to popeye1250)
Profile   Post #: 91
RE: The biggest human fallacy “I’ve got rights” - 6/11/2008 5:15:29 PM   
philosophy


Posts: 5284
Joined: 2/15/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: NorthernGent

quote:

ORIGINAL: philosophy

Rights are the essential liberties that no other person, organisation or government have any authority to take away from you.




At first light, it's an impressive statement.

But.......

From whom have these rights been granted? 

Perhaps the concept of rights is an abstract, human construct, which can be, and are, removed in certain circumstances; which suggests they aren't rights at all. Perhaps we need this human construct to co-exist.


.......fiar question. i think i gave a better definition in my post 78. i wont quote it but to reiterate the basic idea...... i agree that rights are derived from an abstract human concept. In fact, i'm all for abstract human constructs. Justice and mercy are two other such abstract concepts, as is society. We're not the tool using animal....we're the abstract concept using animal. It's what makes us human.
Where we may disagree is in suggesting that rights derived from such abstracts have any less validity than rights derived from some theoretical universal constant. You play the game with the cards you have......live in a society that governs itself according to the tenets of some abstract concept, say socialism, and you are bound to the sense of right and wrong created by such an abstract. Same person, born into a society that follows the capitalism abstract instead and you have a different set of rights and wrongs. Nevertheless, both sets of values are correct for the society they spring from. There is no outside observer, with a standard to suggest which is better than the other one. Well, no outside observer except evolution, which finds out all weaknesses and is as implacable as a tax collector.

(in reply to NorthernGent)
Profile   Post #: 92
RE: The biggest human fallacy “I’ve got rights” - 6/11/2008 5:31:46 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250


Politesub, that's pretty weak.
Remember the Jews in the ghettos in Warsaw, Poland?
They'd kill one or two Germans and grab their guns and ammo.
Then that would give them more power to kill more Germans and grab their ammo too.
Pretty soon they had 300 Jews with guns and ammo!
And if each one of those Jews can kill 3 Germans each they've got 1,200 Jews with guns and ammo.
Plus, they've got sabotage on their side as well.
It can "mushroom" real fast.
They gave the Germans an awful beating.



Popeye, far from my argument being pretty weak, your reply proves my point. There were two upsrisings in Warsaw, the first one, in the Jewish ghetto, ended with just 16 Germans killed, and almost all those living in the ghetto also killed. The second, by the Polish underground army, was assisted by arms drops flown from the UK, as well as local tool shops producing weapons. It was this one that was more successful. Although the Germans were victorious in the end, they suffered over 25,000 casualties, partly but not wholly due to continuous air supply drops to the Polish forces.


Actually the whola analogy sucks the Poles in Warsaw were surrounded on all sides by a modern mobile force.Now on the other hand the "rebels" in the colonies pretty much had the 'lobsterbacks' surrounded.Not to mention the supply line was a real bitch for Mad King George...long ocean voyage and all that...like I said earlier Georgie boy was lucky we let him hold onto his Canadian possesions..There were a lot of boys in the Green Mountain area who felt we should just make a clean sweep of the board....not saying it would have been easy...just saying it would have been hard to hold onto if Washington and his pals were of a mind to..

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 93
RE: The biggest human fallacy “I’ve got rights” - 6/12/2008 6:47:49 AM   
cpK69


Posts: 1593
Joined: 5/9/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: philosophy

......the word 'right' itself has a wealth of shades of meaning that can result in, say, you and i arguing over two different things, both called a 'right'.


I ran into a couple others during my exchange with CL; justice, freedom.

quote:

The word itself also discriminates against us south-paws......


That’s simply; unbalanced.

(in reply to philosophy)
Profile   Post #: 94
RE: The biggest human fallacy “I’ve got rights” - 6/24/2008 6:28:55 PM   
Ozzfan1317


Posts: 62
Joined: 5/13/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

cpK69 i might be missing something here and if so feel free to point it out to me.My confusion is thus...You state that the U.S.is not even close to a just society please supply me with the alternative you have in mind.You state that we do not "have" rights accpt those for which we are able to claim due to our individual abilities,yet if yours were to be arbitrarily infringed would you not avail yourself of the legal remedies open to you.No compact devised by man is perfect though it is my contention The Declaration and the Bill of Rights comes as close as any man has devised....you scoff at these declaration's what is it you would propose...just wondering...


Heres my take we actually are quite fortunate as we live in a nation were you are given basic rights and the freedom to pursue a happy lifestyle in many other countries it doesnt quite work that way. I'm not saying we dont have serious issues with our Justice System or corruption among our politicians but it could be a lot worse and yes we do still have the same rights except the right to free speech is a fuzzy line because if you say the wrong thing about your government or president you can actually be imprisoned.

(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 95
RE: The biggest human fallacy “I’ve got rights” - 6/24/2008 6:58:38 PM   
Daddystouch


Posts: 162
Joined: 10/20/2006
From: South East England
Status: offline
I don't have time to read the entire thread so I shall reply only to the OP

quote:

A recent thread caused me to consider this idea closer. I have abilities, and opportunities; but rights? I don’t think so.

Not to life, liberty, or the pursuit of happiness.

None of these things have just been handed to me. If they were rights they should be, and without consequence.

I have to work for these things, and only get to keep them, if I am responsible toward them. Even then, there’s no guarantee.

Do you have rights?


I believe in negative rights i.e. rights to be free FROM something rather than a right TO something. And the "from" is having other people screw with you or your stuff without your permission. My 0.002p.


_____________________________

What men in all the world have shown such daring?

(in reply to cpK69)
Profile   Post #: 96
RE: The biggest human fallacy “I’ve got rights” - 6/24/2008 8:40:46 PM   
stella41b


Posts: 4258
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: SW London (UK)
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

Mike, yes i am suggesting exactly that. I am not trying to take anything away from the bravery of the Patriots here either. The influence France had was enormous, right from the initial supply of weapons and finances, through to the use of troops and naval power. I forget which battle, maybe Yorktown, their were more French troops taking part than Colonialists. I also doubt the outcome would have been the same without the French Naval blockade, which effectively cut Cornwallis off. The fact is France had their own agenda, which was to tie up British forces and naval power, as we fought around the globe.

The irony of all this was the fall of the French Empire, the revoloution in France was largely a part of France being bankrupted by the war in the USA. Even more ironic was the renaming of French fries to freedom fries, given the connections.

This all returns to my original reply to Popeye, without outside help, oppressed peoples normally dont have the military might to overthrow their dictators, King George included.


Politesub, that's pretty weak.
Remember the Jews in the ghettos in Warsaw, Poland?
They'd kill one or two Germans and grab their guns and ammo.
Then that would give them more power to kill more Germans and grab their ammo too.
Pretty soon they had 300 Jews with guns and ammo!
And if each one of those Jews can kill 3 Germans each they've got 1,200 Jews with guns and ammo.
Plus, they've got sabotage on their side as well.
It can "mushroom" real fast.
They gave the Germans an awful beating.



Popeye, it wasn't like that at all, trust me.

The majority of the Jews in the Warsaw ghetto were 'liquidated' at Treblinka, one of three death camps set up under Operation Reinhard - the other two were Sobibor and Majdanek.

Treblinka is a village on the main Warsaw-Vilnius trunk route not far from Malkinie in the far north east of Poland. There were two camps, Treblinka I and Treblinka II. Treblinka I was a labour camp which was built in the summer of 1941 after the Nazis attacked the Soviet Union. This was a camp for Poles, Jews and criminals. It was run by 20 SS officers and around 100 guards, mainly Ukrainians. The camp was divided into two: the administration part and the camp, which was further divided into three: Poles, Jews, and women. It was liquidated with the advance of the Red Army in 1944.

Treblinka II was the death camp set up under Operation Reinhard. It was built late spring 1942 and existed until November 1943. Around 800,000 Jews were exterminated here, which makes it second only to Auschwitz KL Birkenau where around 1.2 million were exterminated. It was staffed by 20-30 SS officers and 120-100 guards, again Ukrainian. There were a further 300-400 prisoners who were whipped and beaten as they worked. If they woke with a bruise showing they were executed by firing squad that morning, and other prisoners were brought in to replace them. On average Treblinka II went through 1,000-1,200 prisoners every week. This camp opened in July 1942 and the first transport of Jews from the Warsaw ghetto took place July 23 of that year. They were loaded onto special freight trains of 60 wagons at Warsaw Main station (Warszawa Głowna) at the south west corner of the ghetto and also at the Gdansk station at the north of the ghetto (Warszawa Gdanska) and transported to Treblinka. The locomotives had a special loud whistle which sounded as the trains approached Malkinie to let the Ukrainian guards know that a train was arriving and to take up their positions. Jews arrived at a railway station in the camp, they were herded through the station, stripped, shaved, and sorted between the Pit and the Tube.

Those allocated to the Pit would be required to sit on the egde of a large pit with their backs to the station behind, they would then be machine-gunned and their bodies would fall forward into the pit. Guards would then come with rifles and shoot at any signs of movement. Those allocated to the Tube would be forced to run naked about a mile along a wide path cleared from forest - barbed wire on both sides - uphill to the gas chambers. They were sorted into men, women and children. The men would be gassed in the chambers first and the women and children literally shit themselves as they heard their menfolk dying. The stench from the shit and rotting bodies could be smelt up to ten miles away and suicides on the trains were common.

Treblinka II was closed down after the liquidation of the Warsaw ghetto in August 1943. The Nazis filled in the graves, and planted trees so that by November 1943 Treblinka II resembled pretty much as it does today.

The Warsaw Uprising took place in 1944 between August 1 and October 3. It was an armed resistance organized by Armia Krajowa (Polish National Army) under the code word 'Burza' (storm) involving also Polskie Panstwo Podziemne (The Polish Underground Republic, part of the Polish Resistance) The idea was to rise up against the Nazis and also the advancing Red Army to create a different Polish government than the one agreed at the Teheran Conference between the USA, Britain and the USSR.

When the Uprising broke out Heinrich Himmler ordered that Warsaw be completely destroyed and everyone in it killed without taking into account the Hague Convention. The Red Army were advancing through eastern Poland and had just taken the town of Radzymin, some 40 miles north east of Warsaw. Red Army commanders paused their advance, taking into account their own successes and advance and optimistic about their own planned offensives on the basis of the Uprising they estimated that it would last a few days. It actually lasted 63 days. Polish losses were around 10,000 killed, 7,000 missing, 5,000 soldiers injured, and between 120,000-200,000 civilian casualties - almost all the Warsaw 'intelligentsia' and many youths among them. Among the Nazis 10,000 were killed, 7,000 lost or died as a result of injuries, 9,000 injured soldiers, 300 tanks and armoured cars destroyed.

During the Uprising a further 25% of the city was destroyed, and after the end by the Vernichtungskommando - the Nazi destruction force a further 35% was destroyed, which taking into account the 10% during the 1939 invasion and the 15% destroyed during the liquidation of the Warsaw ghetto meant that by the end of the War 85% of Warsaw lay in ruins.

The above figures taken from data taken from the Polish Instytut Pamieci Narodowej (National History Institute), the Warsaw Uprising Museum and Polish Wikipedia pages.

_____________________________

CM's Resident Lyricist
also Facebook
http://stella.baker.tripod.com/
50NZpoints
Q2
Simply Q

(in reply to popeye1250)
Profile   Post #: 97
RE: The biggest human fallacy “I’ve got rights” - 6/24/2008 9:12:35 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
 If I`m alive,I have the right to breath.

If you think I don`t have the right to breath air ,then we have a problem.

Next is water.I`m alive and have the right to stay that way by drinking enough water.

If you think you or anyone can stop me or anyone else from drinking water ,then we have a problem.

Food.Like air and water,without it I`d die.If you don`t think you (or anyone else) or me has a right to eat,we gotta problem.

A home/space/hole to live in.If you don`t think people have the right to exist in the world,that`s a problem.All people take up some amount of space(even a prisoner)and if alive,must be allowed to have it.Unless you`re ok w/ someone stuffing you into a box.

I have the right to wear warm duds in winter and a raincoat in a storm.

I have the right to have children and make them secure.No one has the right to stop that.

If you don`t think these basic needs aren`t also rights,stop reading here.

If those needs are also basic rights,then I have the right to make my home cleaner,warmer,drier and blessed with plenty .

I`m alive and therefore have the right to think and to fill my house with books and art.In other words,happiness.

I would also have the right to travel to get those things and the right to keep what I gathered legally.

For those basic things to be taken away or withheld from me,someone would have to actually do something to stop me.

I think the fallacy is that someone would try to .

< Message edited by Owner59 -- 6/24/2008 9:17:11 PM >

(in reply to stella41b)
Profile   Post #: 98
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: The biggest human fallacy “I’ve got rights” Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109