Chaingang
Posts: 1727
Joined: 10/24/2005 Status: offline
|
I'm finding this thread generally pretty amusing... Firstly, I think the supposed submissive's ad could easily be a fake one and that TearCollector is having fun with horny net geeks. The ad photo is odd to say the least - the sub is wearing a kind of dress that would send most horny net geeks screaming from the room. The woman in question seems attractive enough, but what's with the hairstyle and apparent lack of makeup - it doesn't fit with the aforementioned attire. Amongst her wonderful reasons for wanting to hookup with someone is this gem: "I just am lonely." Beyond being grammatically awkward, that's not a great selling point to my mind - the girl is in one of the BDSM culture's hotspots and not making friends when all of her specs (young, fit, attractive, single, childless?) would indicate that she should have no problem finding friends and mates. So that's odd too. If I had a negative comment to make about her appearance, it would simply be that I would personally find her both on the short and slight side - as I like taller and fuller figured women. But hey, to each their own... But let's assume it's all real - which I think is a stretch really... Then TearCollector should want this young thing for himself. But then I read his profile too and he seems almost antithetical to whatever the sub in question might represent. He's well into his middle years (which would tend to disqualify him with the younger crowd, even though I would actually say it's a point in his favor because of what it means in terms of wisdom), has two kids, and a very full life of working 24/7 365 days a year. So not only does he have very little time to play but there are these two gems in his profile: "I make sacrifices for my boys that are challenging for some people to understand. A potential slave will need to embrace my choices concerning them." and "...I will note to you that I am neither lonely or in a rush." While I commend his commitment to parenthood, such commitment is actually why I find many people of my own years unacceptable as mates - I don't want kids myself, and I can't see why a young sub would rush to have an "instant" family either. The second quote leads me to believe that TearCollector is actually happy exactly as he is and unwilling to make many of the compromises that one would expect him to have to make in adding a new person to his life. Any sub of TearCollector's is clearly secondary to everything else in his life. Half of me understands and agrees with that stance, half of me thinks that compromise is necessary and that TearCollector is going to be searching a long time if he really means all of that stuff. In the journal entry for the sub's ad TearCollector has added in all kinds of criteria to further his socialogical experiment. I mean it is interesting: here is TearCollector, a supposed Dom doing the email chores of some sub I have to assume he barely knows. Then he adds in all of this stuff to see if he can get other Doms to conform to his own requirements. And he even adds in all kinds of weird criteria that have nothing to do with anything, like this bit: "I have decided to delete any messages with pictures of men in hunting gear..." Now I happen to rarely look at men's profile, but I have looked at Padriag's because he seems like one of the brighter people on the forums and I am pretty sure that requirement would disqualify him. So that's funny: pointless criteria that rules out one of the better male catches on the site (I mean, he's a skinny bastard sure, but he seems unusually intelligent which would attract me if I were a sub woman). The killer is that most of this is explained up front on the sub's profile also - that if you write to her you are working through him. Ultimately, I am not sure what to make of either the experiment or the possible results obtained. Occasionally I have been known to reply to ads simply because I think they are fake ads and I am wondering if the person will reply at all or what revealing information a reply might contain. Even in chat conversations I find ways to bait people if I think there's a chance they are fake or misrepresenting a transgender status or whatever. So you have to be careful, there are games within games on the internet - most of it intended just to kill time. So here is TearCollector's twist on the Turing Test - can a male Dom pretend he is the intermediary for a real female sub placing an ad on the internet and get other male Doms to believe him? I could be wrong about all of this, but then I barely care either way. Almost as good as a the daily crossword puzzle.
|