celticlord2112
Posts: 5732
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: slvemike4u CL are You saying You would have no problem with any of this ,save for the platform promise of "change".Being that McCain made no such "promise" he is free to "change" his mind (and apparently his beliefs) on a number of issues,such as the enviorment,torture,evangelicals etc.etc. Hardly. I am saying that, on specific issues, I expect the candidates to "change" their mind--reality has a way of upsetting the issues apple cart after inauguration. (case in point: 9/11). I am saying that, in the manner of their campaigning, in the style of their leadership, I do expect a certain consistency and adherence to principle. That is the only surety we have on which to trust the changes whomever wins the Oval Office WILL make to their campaign pledges. I am saying that McCain has a substantial history of working to change election campaign financing laws. I am saying that if anyone has the credibility to discuss how the system is "broken," it is John McCain, not Barack Obama. I am saying that Obama's decision to evade public scrutiny and refuse public funds is a money-driven decision, which in its crass logic leaves him pandering to the very elements of the "broken" financing system he criticizes so sharply. I am saying that Obama talks a great game about "change" but so far has only offered up business as usual. I am saying that Obama set a high moral tone and then slips under the bar at every opportunity. I am saying that, so far, there is more hypocrisy surrounding Obama than there is McCain. I am saying that if Obama's only objective is to get elected, I wish he would say that and be upfront about his lust for power. I would respect that. This pretense of being a latter-day FDR and JFK and MLK all rolled into one is laughable.
_____________________________
|