poisonedprogress -> RE: Ever out yourself by accident cause the vanillas got on your nerves? (6/22/2008 2:41:23 PM)
|
quote:
if not, then you have inside information because YOU know her, she used a cellphone? was that mentioned in her post? NO. This is exactly why I said you made a whole bunch of baseless assumptions. quote:
It is an office. Not a restraunt, not your home..GET IT? She thought she was alone. Despite being told this upwards of a dozen times, you still don't get it. quote:
When and if you are on company time/property, NO you are not alone. What magical qualities of work prevent you from being alone, especially if you're often the last one to leave? Yet more assumptions... quote:
If you want to assume you are alone, leave the building. Oh but you might not be alone there either! quote:
I think my 'stupid assumptions' are not so, they are merely taking from I read from her quote. No, you clearly didn't read what she posted. I've refuted all of your incorrect assumptions with direct quotes. You, on the other hand, continue to make shit up. quote:
Point is, he PESTERED, anyone who pesters at a jobsite..in referring to what they do on weekends or any other topic is HARASSMENT. Here you assume that the use of the term pestered translates flawlessly into harassment. You have an assumption problem. The funny part is that this specific quote has been explained to you repeatedly... and you still don't get it. quote:
awe. did you not get it? Her submissive tendencies have anything to do with her work? He is her boss? Even if he was, he had no right asking. HE WAS A CO-WORKER...some shlump who thought she was an easy mark to HARASS. Four times? Five? Six? I've lost count as to how many times you have been told that he was not harassing her. She behaved submissively in an entirely vanilla way, and he "pestered" her about it, as in "why do you just let people run roughshod over you?" type shit. This too has been explained to you repeatedly. Still you do not appear to get it. quote:
I saw no mention of a use of a cellphone, I only saw 'while she was on the phone'. Even still, if it were a cellphone, what is the difference really? If you use the company computers to say something PERSONAL..it isn't personal...ever. She wasn't using company computers. From what magical place did you pull that one? quote:
If you use your own laptop at work yet link into THEIR server - same issue. Here you go making shit up again... quote:
If you use a cellphone at work and are overheard....then you really should think twice about being on it in case you are overheard at a workplace. How simple has that been described to anyone with work ethics education? 1) She thought she was alone. Thinking one is alone is not unreasonable under circumstances when one would commonly find themselves alone, such as at work when you're the last one leaving and you're on the phone whispering. 2) She actually stated in the post that the experience has provoked greater caution. quote:
I don't make assumations. Lies. I've called out numerous assumptions. You've also admitted to them. quote:
if not, then you have inside information because YOU know her, she used a cellphone? was that mentioned in her post? NO. She didn't say she was on the company phone in the post either. That is you admitting to your assumption that she was on a company phone. quote:
I have stated I am not a mind reader. Then you should stop making assumptions. quote:
You are using inside information from your *cough gf/slave/sub to finish and complete the story as it was NOT described before. I am going on what she said and only by that. What you decide to drag into it (cellphone etc) is news to us/me as areader of her situation. I'm using inside information to refute the numerous baseless assumptions you made. You know... the one about harassment, the one about the phone, the one about intentionally slipping, etc.. etc.... quote:
Why does that not seep into your thick skull? Someone nosey at WORK ..someone overhearing a private conversation.... that someone was not on a company phone but a cellphone? What is the difference? 1) She thought she was alone. So many times I have said this. 2) You pissed and moaned about her using a company phone that she did not use. I was pointing out that you made yet another stupid/baseless assumption. quote:
I don't insult her. I claim that if she was outed (by mistake, yet on purpose ..as she claims) then any downfall of such disclosure (stupid mistake or otherwise) should fall upon the disclosee. Yeah. And you called her a moron for correcting your numerous incorrect assumptions, from which you derived your hilariously incorrect conclusion. quote:
Sure you were and sure you did. I frankly don't care what and where you go. And what made you think I gave a shit about your BBQ? quote:
Again? with the word stupid? That is the word I am using to describe you. quote:
Ever think that hmmmm 'she (I) doesn't care what you do and how you disclosed, the point is she disclosed, offended/perhaps alienated people and those very people use this kind of information to make a WORKPLACE a drama event. Since you both claim it wasn't this disclosure that was the cause of her being 'talked about' to begin with....one has to wonder what it was really about. She disclosed under the pretenses of trust. You're blaming her for the betrayal of someone else, which is not only fucked, it is incredibly stupid. STUPID: the word I am using to describe you. Remember? You're the type who would blame a rape victim for being female around males. Since gagging is your sub/friend and you deem to protect her (as it seems), can you not do so with more dignity? quote:
I afford people the civility that they warrant. By making numerous retarded assumptions, you've demonstrated stupidity. By responding to my slave's correction with MORE retarded assumptions AND baseless insults, you demonstrated further stupidity, in addition to a clear desire to not remain civil. You're an idiot/asshole, and I treated you accordingly. When you offer my slave an apology for making up a bunch of shit and pretending she said it, then offer her an additional apology for insulting her for no reason, I'll gladly admit that I was wrong about you and the way I treated you, then offer an apology of my own. quote:
LOL, I won't apologize for having my opinion that she brought it all upon herself. I don't give a fuck about your dumbass opinion. I don't even give a fuck about your retarded assumptions and your baseless insults. I'm here for the entertainment of baiting an idiot with a crippling reading comprehension problem and a penchant for botching the simplest logic. I derive sadistic pleasure from exposing idiocy and humiliating idiots. quote:
Anyone who allows such abuse at a workplace as I said., has lost their legal rights, but can go ahead and bitch about it for a lifetime. Again I shall remind you that it was not abuse. This has been explained to you numerous times, and yet still you do not get it. This is why I use the word STUPID to describe you. quote:
Who are you except some young buck who obviously agrees to console those who have no self-control. Who are you except some dried up old hag of a bitch who has to make shit up and pretend its real then hurl insults at someone sharing a simple story of accidental outing? You made up half the shit you blame her for, the insult her for it? Then you cop this half-assed idiotic condescending attitude where you make even MORE stupid assumptions and refuse to address any of the numerous corrections that were made to the axiom of your opinion? This thread is for sharing outing stories, NOT for making shit up like a dumbass, pretending someone else said it, then insulting them for it and making a total ass of yourself in general. quote:
Fine, if it works, yet don't be surprised with others (at the office) see it as a weakness and she ends up unemployed because of it. Not my problem. It seems to be yours now. She left that clinic with letters of recommendation. The instigator of the mess was fired, and the mess had nothing to do with her coming out to her coworkers. That was just another stupid incorrect assumption made by YOU. It has been said, quite clearly, and repeatedly, that she had preferred for those who had participated in the mess to not have known about her kinkiness.
|
|
|
|