RE: Why are you FOR your candidate? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


celticlord2112 -> RE: Why are you FOR your candidate? (6/22/2008 3:52:53 PM)

quote:

I apologise a better description would be a slow suffocation into extinction.

That is also inaccurate.

Income Mobility

quote:

What about claims of a disappearing middle class? Let's do some detective work. Controlling for inflation, in 1967, 8 percent of households had an annual income of $75,000 and up; in 2003, more than 26 percent did. In 1967, 17 percent of households had a $50,000 to $75,000 income; in 2003, it was 18 percent. In 1967, 22 percent of households were in the $35,000 to $50,000 income group; by 2003, it had fallen to 15 percent. During the same period, the $15,000 to $35,000 category fell from 31 percent to 25 percent, and the under $15,000 category fell from 21 percent to 16 percent. The only reasonable conclusion from this evidence is that if the middle class is disappearing, it's doing so by swelling the ranks of the upper classes.





slvemike4u -> RE: Why are you FOR your candidate? (6/22/2008 3:59:43 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: celticlord2112

quote:

I apologise a better description would be a slow suffocation into extinction.

That is also inaccurate.

HOW?




celticlord2112 -> RE: Why are you FOR your candidate? (6/22/2008 4:01:25 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

quote:

ORIGINAL: celticlord2112

quote:

I apologise a better description would be a slow suffocation into extinction.

That is also inaccurate.

HOW?

See previous post.  (Hit the OK button instead of the Preview button [:D])




farglebargle -> RE: Why are you FOR your candidate? (6/22/2008 4:08:17 PM)

I'm not *for* any candidate.

They all fucking suck.





slvemike4u -> RE: Why are you FOR your candidate? (6/22/2008 4:26:53 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: celticlord2112

quote:

I apologise a better description would be a slow suffocation into extinction.

That is also inaccurate.

Income Mobility

quote:

What about claims of a disappearing middle class? Let's do some detective work. Controlling for inflation, in 1967, 8 percent of households had an annual income of $75,000 and up; in 2003, more than 26 percent did. In 1967, 17 percent of households had a $50,000 to $75,000 income; in 2003, it was 18 percent. In 1967, 22 percent of households were in the $35,000 to $50,000 income group; by 2003, it had fallen to 15 percent. During the same period, the $15,000 to $35,000 category fell from 31 percent to 25 percent, and the under $15,000 category fell from 21 percent to 16 percent. The only reasonable conclusion from this evidence is that if the middle class is disappearing, it's doing so by swelling the ranks of the upper classes.


Wish I had Your skills for finding sources to support my beliefs Despite the slanted cherry picked statistics cited by Income Mobility...I still stand by my previous statement the middle class in this country is an endangered species.Now the talent to find a statistical study that props up Your preconcieved opinions while admirable as a skill does not change the facts...The morgatge crisis in this country ,runaway fuel prices ,rising food  costs all spell doom for the working man trying to raise a family and damm him if he believes he can send his children to a University..Statistics are nice and they can be persuasuive but life is real and I invite You to look around and please make it a hard look Your neighbors are having a harder and harder time making ends meet.Second mortgages and maxed out credit cards are now the default condition of that middle class Your statistics suggest are healthy.Median Income while a useful barometer are not the end all and be all...And does not address the gap i mentioned between the haves and have nots...does Your Income Mobility report explain the precipitous rise in executive pay ,while simulteneously downsizing of workforces ,outsourcing of services all with one goal in mind increasing the bottom line .But at who's expence ,despite what Your report say's it is the middle class that this burden crushes....




bipolarber -> RE: Why are you FOR your candidate? (6/22/2008 4:40:34 PM)

I'll answer this one without reading any of the other posts. Simply put:

I support Obama because I want my fucking country back!

Thank you.




celticlord2112 -> RE: Why are you FOR your candidate? (6/22/2008 4:44:32 PM)

quote:

Wish I had Your skills for finding sources to support my beliefs Despite the slanted cherry picked statistics cited by Income Mobility...I still stand by my previous statement the middle class in this country is an endangered species.Now the talent to find a statistical study that props up Your preconcieved opinions while admirable as a skill does not change the facts...The morgatge crisis in this country ,runaway fuel prices ,rising food costs all spell doom for the working man trying to raise a family and damm him if he believes he can send his children to a University..Statistics are nice and they can be persuasuive but life is real and I invite You to look around and please make it a hard look Your neighbors are having a harder and harder time making ends meet.Second mortgages and maxed out credit cards are now the default condition of that middle class Your statistics suggest are healthy.Median Income while a useful barometer are not the end all and be all...And does not address the gap i mentioned between the haves and have nots...does Your Income Mobility report explain the precipitous rise in executive pay ,while simulteneously downsizing of workforces ,outsourcing of services all with one goal in mind increasing the bottom line .But at who's expence ,despite what Your report say's it is the middle class that this burden crushes....

  • I am squarely in that middle class.  So saith my last several years' tax returns.
  • My credit cards are paid off at the end of every month
  • My mortgage is paid off.  My ex has a house that is hers outright.
  • I paid my own way through college.  My boys are doing the same.
Along the way I have managed to:
  1. Buy groceries for a unemployed lady friend who needed to refill the pantry after Hurricane Rita
  2. Put up the down payment on another lady friend's new car after hers was totaled by a dumbass driver with no insurance.
  3. Paid the rent on a (now ex) slave's apartment (in addition to my own).
I am not crushed by life.  I take it as it comes and look for every opportunity to prosper.

The Bene Gesserit in Frank Herbert's Dune taught that "fear is the mind killer".  FDR said "the only thing we have to fear is fear itself".

In every circumstance, I choose hope over despair, anticipation over fear.  It's what I do.




bipolarber -> RE: Why are you FOR your candidate? (6/22/2008 4:57:08 PM)

So why do you support a party that are the worst fear mongers this country has seen since Joe McCarthy? Seriously. I'm curious how this paradox is resolved in your mind.




slvemike4u -> RE: Why are you FOR your candidate? (6/22/2008 5:01:33 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: celticlord2112

quote:

Wish I had Your skills for finding sources to support my beliefs Despite the slanted cherry picked statistics cited by Income Mobility...I still stand by my previous statement the middle class in this country is an endangered species.Now the talent to find a statistical study that props up Your preconcieved opinions while admirable as a skill does not change the facts...The morgatge crisis in this country ,runaway fuel prices ,rising food costs all spell doom for the working man trying to raise a family and damm him if he believes he can send his children to a University..Statistics are nice and they can be persuasuive but life is real and I invite You to look around and please make it a hard look Your neighbors are having a harder and harder time making ends meet.Second mortgages and maxed out credit cards are now the default condition of that middle class Your statistics suggest are healthy.Median Income while a useful barometer are not the end all and be all...And does not address the gap i mentioned between the haves and have nots...does Your Income Mobility report explain the precipitous rise in executive pay ,while simulteneously downsizing of workforces ,outsourcing of services all with one goal in mind increasing the bottom line .But at who's expence ,despite what Your report say's it is the middle class that this burden crushes....

  • I am squarely in that middle class.  So saith my last several years' tax returns.
  • My credit cards are paid off at the end of every month
  • My mortgage is paid off.  My ex has a house that is hers outright.
  • I paid my own way through college.  My boys are doing the same.
Along the way I have managed to:
  1. Buy groceries for a unemployed lady friend who needed to refill the pantry after Hurricane Rita
  2. Put up the down payment on another lady friend's new car after hers was totaled by a dumbass driver with no insurance.
  3. Paid the rent on a (now ex) slave's apartment (in addition to my own).
I am not crushed by life.  I take it as it comes and look for every opportunity to prosper.

The Bene Gesserit in Frank Herbert's Dune taught that "fear is the mind killer".  FDR said "the only thing we have to fear is fear itself".

In every circumstance, I choose hope over despair, anticipation over fear.  It's what I do.

CL I made no claim has to Your personal prosperity(BTW good for You),what i did claim on the other hand is these are not good times for the American working man,and any claim to the contrary is a simple case of juggling statistics and chery picking facts




celticlord2112 -> RE: Why are you FOR your candidate? (6/22/2008 5:07:02 PM)

quote:

what i did claim on the other hand is these are not good times for the American working man,and any claim to the contrary is a simple case of juggling statistics and chery picking facts

That is hardly a defensible proposition.  If facts refute your thesis, either the facts must be disproven or the thesis moderated.  Any other course is an exercise in illogic.

Your position admits of only agreement and disagreement.  Given those options, I choose to disagree.





Alumbrado -> RE: Why are you FOR your candidate? (6/22/2008 5:08:29 PM)

quote:

juggling statistics and chery picking facts


I for one, am shocked - shocked to find that going on.[;)]




DomKen -> RE: Why are you FOR your candidate? (6/22/2008 5:11:52 PM)

I find it absolutely hilarious that if anyone on the left posts a link to an even remotely left source we get hammered over it but the right wingers routinely post crap made up by townhall, the Washington Times, UPI, worldnetdaily and other far right sources. In this case a fauxnews anchor wrote about an editorial in the WSJ which in turn references a study supposedly done by the US Treasury but no identifying info is given. I've just spent a half hour searching their website. I cannot find the study. If Williams, townhall and the WSJ editorial board were so confident of the data in the study why not actually point us to it?

To the OP I'm voting for Obama for a host of reasons. He believes in many of the same things I do and that is not true of McCain. I'm confident that Obama will appoint federal judges who have actually read the bill of rights and do not think they're quaint relics. I'm confident that 8 years from now if Obama is elected we won't be reading about some minor functionary of the DoJ telling the President he can do anything he wants and having had the President actually believe such patent garbage.




popeye1250 -> RE: Why are you FOR your candidate? (6/22/2008 5:12:39 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: bipolarber

I'll answer this one without reading any of the other posts. Simply put:

I support Obama because I want my fucking country back!

Thank you.


LOL, Bipolar, you want your country back?
Well now that Obama's broken his promise about not taking corporate money you'll have to stand in line behind, Exon/mobil, Haliburton, ALL the Big Pharmas, and ALL the Big Banks!
Bring a lawn chair!




subrob1967 -> RE: Why are you FOR your candidate? (6/22/2008 5:18:38 PM)

I don't have a horse in this race, the guy I was going to vote for conceded a while ago.

I can't vote for either McCain nor Obama, they are two sides of the same corrupt coin.





MzMia -> RE: Why are you FOR your candidate? (6/22/2008 5:55:30 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

quote:

ORIGINAL: bipolarber

I'll answer this one without reading any of the other posts. Simply put:

I support Obama because I want my fucking country back!

Thank you.


LOL, Bipolar, you want your country back?
Well now that Obama's broken his promise about not taking corporate money you'll have to stand in line behind, Exon/mobil, Haliburton, ALL the Big Pharmas, and ALL the Big Banks!
Bring a lawn chair!


My question is, "Who is really surprised about the campaign financing?"
It is a well known fact, that Obama has plenty of friends in high places that support him.

Would he be where he is NOW, without serious back-up?




popeye1250 -> RE: Why are you FOR your candidate? (6/22/2008 5:57:09 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

I find it absolutely hilarious that if anyone on the left posts a link to an even remotely left source we get hammered over it but the right wingers routinely post crap made up by townhall, the Washington Times, UPI, worldnetdaily and other far right sources. In this case a fauxnews anchor wrote about an editorial in the WSJ which in turn references a study supposedly done by the US Treasury but no identifying info is given. I've just spent a half hour searching their website. I cannot find the study. If Williams, townhall and the WSJ editorial board were so confident of the data in the study why not actually point us to it?

To the OP I'm voting for Obama for a host of reasons. He believes in many of the same things I do and that is not true of McCain. I'm confident that Obama will appoint federal judges who have actually read the bill of rights and do not think they're quaint relics. I'm confident that 8 years from now if Obama is elected we won't be reading about some minor functionary of the DoJ telling the President he can do anything he wants and having had the President actually believe such patent garbage.


DomKen, I agree and I have a theory about why the left gets hammered on that.
I think they see the world the way they "wish it to be" instead of the way it actually is like the rest of us.
It's kind of like Alice in Wonderland where up is down and down is...something else. ( kInd oF lIKE thiS.)
Many on the left haven't seemed to mature psychologically like other people, like they're "behind" in cognitive abilities (Psychological Dyslexia?) or something with large amounts of what the medical community would label "cognative dissonance."
Many are what's called "passive aggressives", they "refuse to grow up."
A good example would be the "neighborhood organizer" a fifty something male many times with the signature "ponytail" and a somewhat "spotty" background (possably some criminality) and who views any authority figure as "the enemy."
And in some extreme examples even if you "agree" with them they'll continue to argue with you.
(Remind you of anyone?)
So, that's my theory of why those on the left (do) take more of their fair share of "hammering."
And believe me, the WSJ deserves plenty of "hammering" too but that's another thread.
You may have noticed that I'm not real big on "links."
If someone wants my opinion why would they ask me for "links" which contain another person's opinion?




slvemike4u -> RE: Why are you FOR your candidate? (6/22/2008 6:34:18 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: celticlord2112

quote:

Wish I had Your skills for finding sources to support my beliefs Despite the slanted cherry picked statistics cited by Income Mobility...I still stand by my previous statement the middle class in this country is an endangered species.Now the talent to find a statistical study that props up Your preconcieved opinions while admirable as a skill does not change the facts...The morgatge crisis in this country ,runaway fuel prices ,rising food costs all spell doom for the working man trying to raise a family and damm him if he believes he can send his children to a University..Statistics are nice and they can be persuasuive but life is real and I invite You to look around and please make it a hard look Your neighbors are having a harder and harder time making ends meet.Second mortgages and maxed out credit cards are now the default condition of that middle class Your statistics suggest are healthy.Median Income while a useful barometer are not the end all and be all...And does not address the gap i mentioned between the haves and have nots...does Your Income Mobility report explain the precipitous rise in executive pay ,while simulteneously downsizing of workforces ,outsourcing of services all with one goal in mind increasing the bottom line .But at who's expence ,despite what Your report say's it is the middle class that this burden crushes....

  • I am squarely in that middle class.  So saith my last several years' tax returns.
  • My credit cards are paid off at the end of every month
  • My mortgage is paid off.  My ex has a house that is hers outright.
  • I paid my own way through college.  My boys are doing the same.
Along the way I have managed to:
  1. Buy groceries for a unemployed lady friend who needed to refill the pantry after Hurricane Rita
  2. Put up the down payment on another lady friend's new car after hers was totaled by a dumbass driver with no insurance.
  3. Paid the rent on a (now ex) slave's apartment (in addition to my own).
I am not crushed by life.  I take it as it comes and look for every opportunity to prosper.

The Bene Gesserit in Frank Herbert's Dune taught that "fear is the mind killer".  FDR said "the only thing we have to fear is fear itself".

In every circumstance, I choose hope over despair, anticipation over fear.  It's what I do.

Citing Your personal financial state is no more indicative of the general well- being of the middle class than my observances,though it did lead me to wonder ,were the 3 Lady's cited in Your post,by any chance once members of that robust midde class....I will leave You with this,cherry- picked to support my position.....
4. Middle-class America is already experiencing severe pressures in other areas:

A) Family relationships have changed: "These days many parents are facing a new fact of life: ongoing financial help to their adult offspring, even into middle age." (Gardner, 12/11/03).
B) To obtain middle-class status for their families, parents have financially leveraged themselves. Nobody has documented this stress better than Elizabeth Warren and Amelia Warren Tyagi. Their newly released book: The Two Income Trap: Why Middle-Class Mothers & Fathers Are Going Broke, is ground-breaking. They provide a comprehensive analysis of how middle-class families are too leveraged, and within a whisker of being pushed off a financial cliff. The continuation of outsourcing jobs overseas may be the final gust of wind that does it for many of them.

The University of Pittsburgh's Professor Emeritus Fred Thayer also writes about the disappearing middle class and the relentless cost reduction efforts by corporations. "Global competition now compels corporations to adhere to standard economic principles by drastically reducing costs by punishing workers and retirees in order to sell their output at the lowest possible prices. This trend will inevitably spill over into public and nonprofit sectors via privatization mania, and some of the actions now being taken are indeed tragic... I am old enough to remember when the streets were full of disabled people, many of them amputees, who themselves had no choice but to beg for assistance from passerby who themselves had little or nothing to spare. That world is returning." (Thayer, 8/19/03)....That piece of optimistic reporting comes from Dr.Raynor Professor of Finance State University of new York...wish I could provide you the link but as I said earlier I don't have Your skills...




popeye1250 -> RE: Why are you FOR your candidate? (6/22/2008 6:50:07 PM)

Mia! You are correct Madam!
Obama's has loads of money comming in from "a high!"
In two months BiPolar absolutely won't recognise him!
He's going to "out -Republican" John McCain to be "the most republican" of all candidates!
And "conservative?"
BiPolar's head is going to be spinning around like that little girl spitting out the pea soup being chased by the devil!
I bet Obama is already ordering $1,000 suits from Hickey-Freeman!
He's going to make John McCain look like Jimmy Carter on May Day!
The leftists will be going around screaming, "Don't vote for Obama!" "It's a Trick!" He's really a REPUBLICAN!!!" "It's a REPUBLICAN TRICK!"




celticlord2112 -> RE: Why are you FOR your candidate? (6/22/2008 7:25:54 PM)

quote:

They provide a comprehensive analysis of how middle-class families are too leveraged, and within a whisker of being pushed off a financial cliff.

Anyone who argues that debt is anything other than personal choice is fighting a losing battle.

I live well mainly because I reject debt.  I am able to help others because I reject debt.

And yes--it is that simple. 




slvemike4u -> RE: Why are you FOR your candidate? (6/22/2008 7:32:14 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: celticlord2112

quote:

They provide a comprehensive analysis of how middle-class families are too leveraged, and within a whisker of being pushed off a financial cliff.

Anyone who argues that debt is anything other than personal choice is fighting a losing battle.

I live well mainly because I reject debt.  I am able to help others because I reject debt.

And yes--it is that simple. 

All well and good CL and even granting that it is that simple...this is also simple Your personal financial well being is not indicative of a healthy middle-class..and in no way lessens the effects of a poor housing market globalization ,outsourcing,downsizing and the undereducation of the American working class...has all lead to a shrinking of the middle class...despite Your own personal rejection of debt....(pstt  can you lend a guy a few bucks...please)




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875