Untouched1282
Posts: 142
Joined: 2/12/2008 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: SmartQuietMan quote:
ORIGINAL: Untouched1282 As a Dom[me], do you think you could be with someone who was dealing with such issues in their personal life? It could be that they find meaning through service, or fail to see themselves worthy of being a DOM (or even an equal) because of such emotional disorders. It could be that, with the proper counseling -- or help from a positive Dominant person in their life -- they could overcome these issues and no longer need such a submissive existence. I'm a nurture over nature guy, who doesn't feel anyone has an innate disposition, so I think this could be a very real possibility. (Everyone has a tendency to chance, grow, especially with time and experience). Hi. I'm not a Domme (obviously) but I do see something here I'd like to comment on. I hope no one minds about that. This seems to treat submission as the result of the person having some sort of mental problem. It then seems to pretty clearly imply that if this problem was resolved the need to be submissive could be cured. Having a submissive nature does not, in any way, indicate that there is anything wrong with that individual. I was not at all attempting to assert such value judgments as "good" or "bad", "right" or "wrong", to the label of "sub". With that being said, I don't think it's possible to deny the impact of the society in the development of one's submissive and/or dominant tendencies. We don't have innatte natures, at least for the most part. We may have a genetic makeup that will leave of prone to swing one way or another, but it's all contingent on the way we are raised. With this being said, I'm a postmodern :/
|