windchymes -> RE: Married (11/7/2005 1:51:53 PM)
|
Speaking from experience.... Staying in a bad marriage "because of the kids".....because of what about the kids??? My kids were 7 & 5 when I got divorced, and I didn't remarry for 7 years. Their dad and I remained friendly and civil (not to say we didn't have our bickering at times, that's normal. ) There was no set visitation...."Can we go to Dad's?" "I don't care, call him and ask." We didn't fight over child support. Today, one is in his last year of college on an academic scholarship. The other is an automotive tech, is about to enter a management training program, and is engaged to be married to a great girl. They're both good, clean, respectful kids. Well, men. My point here is that, if you handle it right, you don't have to find yourself the parents of the proverbial "products of divorce". My other point is just mine.....I refuse to "play" with a married man. Why? Why should I? Why should the cold, frigid, misunderstanding, high-maintenance, stay-at-home, QVC queen (almost always how they're described by the seeking married dom) get the five-bedroom Colonial with inground pool, the jewelry, the credit cards, the maid service, and the Honda Odyssey, while I go back to my modest home, my full-time and part-time jobs, my used car and my lonely bed? I just don't feel it's my responsibility to make HIS life so complete. My philosophy is to either have the cake or eat it. Why should he get both? I'm sure some will come up with reasons. Let's just say I'M not going to frost the cake for him. I do want to go on record as saying I don't think "Vanilla Spouse" should be grounds for divorce. I would hope the marriage would be lacking in other ways before breaking it up is even an option to be considered. chymes
|
|
|
|