CreativeDominant
Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: taintedgypsy I have had an experience similar to this and the best thing I ever did was walk away. I am not sure I believe in "The One" ... but I strongly believe in the "for a reason or a season" thing ... I am in a relationship at the moment that I know I can not take futher than what it is but I value it and I know I will be sad when it ends. I am reasonably sure that when the time comes we will both smile and stay friends, he is a wonderful person. I think as long as your honest and upfront about things and every one walks through the door with eyes open, it can work. Color me a bit cynical...my last submissive was honest about the fact that she had been involved with others (of course she'd been involved with others...she had a child, after all) and very honest about the fact that her last dominant had hurt her badly. She'd been without him for a year and swore she was over him. What she was not honest about was the fact that there was still a door open to him. When she ended things abruptly with me, it was through a mutual friend of ours that I found out that she had gone back with that dominant and had been corresponding as a "friend" with him during our relationship. So...it is possible to be honest but I have to admit that I wonder just how far that honesty goes with most people. Because I have to admit that, like Northern Gent, I would be reluctant to enter into a relationship where I knew a door to the past was open. Or even with someone who notes, as Winsome does, that the door is not necessarily open but the bridge is not burnt...after all, consider the possibilities and just what may come across that bridge from the past. In MY view, the statement that the door is closed but that there is an unburnt bridge is a semantic twist. And again, I wonder...a bit more specifically this time...given what I've learned about women through the years and in various conversations I have had regarding this topic, I just don't think that many submissive women would care to enter into a relationship with a dominant that they knew (or suspected) had a door open to the past. Why is it different then for them? Because they put a romantic phrasing on it? quote:
I have a question...not specifically to you but to something you brought out in your post. Would you...or anyone else on here for that matter...care to become involved with someone that you knew was holding the door open for a past love? If the answer is "No", then do you consider it fair to do so yourself? ahhh always enjoy your little side line questions/statements CreativeDominant. For me it is not a case of leaving the door open but closing the door is still a work in progress ... some doors are so blocked up with baggage that it can take time to clear it all before the door can be sucessfully shut lol. One of the reasons I know this present relationship can not go any futher forward and that I am so not entering into any kind of full time/committment focussed relationship is that the door to the last one is still not closed properly and untill I have completely put the past in the past I do not feel that I properly participate in a partnership that moves into the future. It would not be fair to who ever else was involved, they would not be getting 100%. So then, was it fair to enter into a relationship with the one you are with now? This next part is speculation but should the following be considered? One reason some women (and some men too, I know) have a difficult time moving forward is that, no matter how much they change, they prefer to hold on to not just the memories of the past but the "what ifs"? And in holding on to those, by leaving doors open or bridges unburnt, they doom the next relationship to failure? quote:
My favorite saying at the moment is that I am a little whirl wind that dances through life, if I flow round you for a while just enjoy, you can not keep me ... you can not hold on to whispering breeze. And I look at that in several ways. If a dominant is younger and still has time ahead in his future, a casual relationship like that can be fun. I've had them. Or for a dominant who always looks to the challenge of being the one to tame the submissive in a way she has not been before, here is a new challenge presented. But for the dominant who looks to settle in and get it "right" this time, the cynical "half-empty glass" side has to look and ask why they would want to enter into something where the cards are stacked against them. Even for the optimistic, "glass half-full" type who believe in a lasting type of love and hopes to find it, this is the type of relationship that he knows, entering into it if he chooses, that his heart is most likely to be broken unless he guards it and remains wary with his emotions. But then, he also runs the risk of being accused of "being afraid" to take a chance...of not sharing himself. In all seriousness, why would he? If she can be honest about the fact that she will not in all likelihood be there for the long haul, why should he give of those areas most likely to be hurt by her leaving?
|